IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i4p542-d1378436.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Drinking Poison to Quench Thirst: Local Government Land Financial Dependence and Urban Innovation Quality

Author

Listed:
  • Shiying Xu

    (School of Management, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu 610103, China)

  • Fuqiang Yang

    (School of Management, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu 610103, China)

  • Qian Yang

    (School of Business, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100871, China)

  • Binbin Chang

    (Business School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China)

  • Kun Wang

    (School of Management, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu 610103, China)

Abstract

Many emerging markets rely on land financing, whereby land grants are used to raise funds for the government. In the short term, land financing eases the government’s fiscal deficit and boosts regional economic development. However, the long-term implications of such behaviour have not been adequately discussed. This study focuses on the relationship between local government land finance dependence (LGLFD) and urban innovation quality (UIQ). We find that LGLFD significantly inhibits the improvement of UIQ, and this inhibition occurs through three main channels: changing government spending preferences, reducing financial efficiency, and deteriorating the institutional environment. Our empirical study analyses 3662 samples from 264 Chinese cities from 2003 to 2016, confirming our research hypothesis. Further research finds that there is significant heterogeneity in the effect of LGLFD on UIQ. Based on these conclusions, some policy implications are proposed.

Suggested Citation

  • Shiying Xu & Fuqiang Yang & Qian Yang & Binbin Chang & Kun Wang, 2024. "Drinking Poison to Quench Thirst: Local Government Land Financial Dependence and Urban Innovation Quality," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:4:p:542-:d:1378436
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/4/542/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/4/542/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kevin M. Murphy & Andrei Shleifer & Robert W. Vishny, 2008. "Why Is Rent-Seeking So Costly to Growth?," Springer Books, in: Roger D. Congleton & Kai A. Konrad & Arye L. Hillman (ed.), 40 Years of Research on Rent Seeking 2, pages 213-218, Springer.
    2. Sabrina T. Howell, 2017. "Financing Innovation: Evidence from R&D Grants," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(4), pages 1136-1164, April.
    3. Daron Acemoglu & Jacob Moscona & James A. Robinson, 2016. "State Capacity and American Technology: Evidence from the 19th Century," NBER Working Papers 21932, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Hamdi Jbir & Cornel Oros & Alexandra Popescu, 2024. "Macroprudential policy and financial system stability: an aggregate study," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 66(5), pages 1941-1973, May.
    5. Gyourko, Joseph & Shen, Yang & Wu, Jing & Zhang, Rongjie, 2022. "Land finance in China: Analysis and review," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    6. Robert Barro, 2002. "Quantity and Quality of Economic Growth," Central Banking, Analysis, and Economic Policies Book Series, in: Norman Loayza & Raimundo Soto & Norman Loayza (Series Editor) & Klaus Schmidt-Hebbel (Series Editor) (ed.),Economic Growth: Sources, Trends, and Cycles, edition 1, volume 6, chapter 5, pages 135-162, Central Bank of Chile.
    7. Wang, Di & Ren, Cairu & Zhou, Tao, 2021. "Understanding the impact of land finance on industrial structure change in China: Insights from a spatial econometric analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    8. Kunce, Mitch & Shogren, Jason F., 2007. "Destructive interjurisdictional competition: Firm, capital and labor mobility in a model of direct emission control," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 543-549, January.
    9. Siyu Han & Mengcheng Wang & Qi Liu & Renyang Wang & Guoliang Ou & Lu Zhang, 2022. "The Influence of Land Disposition Derived from Land Finance on Urban Innovation in China: Mechanism Discussion and Empirical Evidence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-23, March.
    10. Mara Faccio, 2006. "Politically Connected Firms," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 96(1), pages 369-386, March.
    11. Mengkai Chen & Ting Chen & Debao Ruan & Xiaowei Wang, 2023. "Land Finance, Real Estate Market, and Local Government Debt Risk: Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, August.
    12. Yao, Li & Li, Jun & Li, Jian, 2020. "Urban innovation and intercity patent collaboration: A network analysis of China’s national innovation system," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    13. Fan, Jianshuang & Zhou, Lin, 2019. "Three-dimensional intergovernmental competition and urban sprawl: Evidence from Chinese prefectural-level cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    14. Ke Zhao & Danling Chen & Xupeng Zhang & Xiaojie Zhang, 2022. "How Do Urban Land Expansion, Land Finance, and Economic Growth Interact?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-15, April.
    15. Zixing Wang & Meirong Zhang, 2023. "The Distributional Effects Associated with Land Finance in China: A Perspective Based on the Urban–Rural Income Gap," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-15, September.
    16. Daron Acemoglu & Jacob Moscona & James A. Robinson, 2016. "State Capacity and American Technology: Evidence from the Nineteenth Century," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(5), pages 61-67, May.
    17. Mo, Jiawei, 2018. "Land financing and economic growth: Evidence from Chinese counties," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 218-239.
    18. Hu, Albert G.Z. & Zhang, Peng & Zhao, Lijing, 2017. "China as number one? Evidence from China's most recent patenting surge," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 107-119.
    19. Wan, Qunchao & Ye, Jiangfeng & Zheng, Li & Tan, Zhihong & Tang, Shiyi, 2023. "The impact of government support and market competition on China's high-tech industry innovation efficiency as an emerging market," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hu, Yefei & Liu, Dayong, 2022. "Government as a non-financial participant in innovation: How standardization led by government promotes regional innovation performance in China," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    2. Min Chen & Longji Zeng & Yajuan Deng & Shan Chen & Xin Gu, 2024. "The Impact of Land Marketization on Urban Resilience: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-24, August.
    3. Yu, Liangliang & Cai, Yinying, 2021. "Do rising housing prices restrict urban innovation vitality? Evidence from 288 cities in China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 276-288.
    4. Lili Yang & Jian Wang & Yuhao Feng & Qun Wu, 2022. "The Impact of the Regional Differentiation of Land Supply on Total Factor Productivity in China: From the Perspective of Total Factor Productivity Decomposition," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, October.
    5. Chen, Danling & Li, Yuying & Zhang, Chaozheng & Zhang, Yunlei & Hou, Jiao & Lin, Yaoben & Wu, Shiman & Lang, Yan & Hu, Wenbo, 2024. "Regional coordinated development policy as an instrument for alleviating land finance dependency: Evidence from the urban agglomeration development," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    6. Feng Han & Min Huang, 2022. "Land Misallocation and Carbon Emissions: Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-30, July.
    7. Wang, Xu & Zhang, Xiaobo & Xie, Zhuan & Huang, Yiping, 2016. "Roads to innovation: Firm-level evidence from China:," IFPRI discussion papers 1542, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    8. Yu Hao & Kevin Zhengcheng Liu, 2020. "Taxation, fiscal capacity, and credible commitment in eighteenth‐century China: the effects of the formalization and centralization of informal surtaxes," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 73(4), pages 914-939, November.
    9. Zhipeng Tang & Ziao Mei & Jialing Zou, 2021. "Does the Opening of High-Speed Railway Lines Reduce the Carbon Intensity of China’s Resource-Based Cities?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-18, July.
    10. Zhou, Yixiao & Tyers, Rod, 2019. "Automation and inequality in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    11. Leopoldo Fergusson & Horacio Larreguy & Juan Felipe Riaño, 2022. "Political Competition and State Capacity: Evidence from a Land Allocation Program in Mexico," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 132(648), pages 2815-2834.
    12. Shruti Rajagopalan & Alex Tabarrok, 2021. "Simple rules for the developing world," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 341-362, December.
    13. Kulka, Amrita & Smith, Cory, 2024. "Population Centers and Coordination : Evidence from County-Seat Wars," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1518, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    14. Christoph Kronenberg, 2021. "New(spaper) evidence of a reduction in suicide mentions during the 19th century US gold rush," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(10), pages 2582-2594, September.
    15. Badi H. Baltagi & Ying Deng & Jing Li & Zhenlin Yang, 2023. "Cities in a pandemic: Evidence from China," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(2), pages 379-408, March.
    16. Martin Fiszbein, 2017. "Agricultural Diversity, Structural Change and Long-run Development: Evidence from the U.S," NBER Working Papers 23183, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    17. Feng, Xunan & Johansson, Anders C. & Zhang, Tianyu, 2014. "Political participation and entrepreneurial initial public offerings in China," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 269-285.
    18. Yue Lu & Siying Yang & Jian Li, 2022. "The influence of high-speed rails on urban innovation and the underlying mechanism," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-20, March.
    19. Guo, Jingyuan & Deng, Kent, 2024. "Laying off old guards to rebuild state capacity: Deng Xiaoping’s bloodless coup d’etat in post-Mao China, 1980-2000," Economic History Working Papers 126083, London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Economic History.
    20. Rongxin Xu & Yibai Yang & Zhijie Zheng, 2024. "Intellectual property rights, taxation, and firms’ innovation: theory and evidence from China," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 142(1), pages 81-109, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:4:p:542-:d:1378436. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.