Author
Listed:
- Ting Li
(College of Geomatics, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
State Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arid and Semi-Arid Arable Land in Northern China, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Yu Ren
(College of Geomatics, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Zemin Ai
(College of Geomatics, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China)
- Zhihong Qiao
(College of Geomatics, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China)
- Yanjiao Ren
(School of Urban Economics and Public Administration, Capital University of Economics and Business, Beijing 100070, China)
- Liyang Ma
(College of Marxism, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China)
- Yadong Yang
(State Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arid and Semi-Arid Arable Land in Northern China, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)
Abstract
Large-scale vegetation restoration has caused complex changes in ecosystem service (i.e., ES) interactions. However, current analysis on the spatial interactions of ESs and their driving mechanisms remains deficient, limiting the adaptive management in vegetation restoration areas. This study focused on a representative restoration area (Yan’an) to analyze the relationships among carbon sequestration, water yield, baseflow regulation, and soil conservation from 1990 to 2020. Employing the bivariate boxplot and spatial autocorrelation methods, we identified the overall changes and spatial patterns of ES interactions. The geographically and temporally weighted regression (i.e., GTWR) model was applied to elucidate the driving factors of these spatial ES interactions. The results indicated the following: (1) Over the past three decades, synergies between carbon sequestration and water yield emerged as the joint results of spatial ‘low–low’ interactions and ‘high–high’ interactions between the two ESs, while other ES pairs generally exhibited comparatively weaker synergies, due to their spatial ‘low–high’ interactions in southern semi-humid areas. (2) In the northern semi-arid areas, both fractional vegetation cover (i.e., FVC) and climatic factors consistently exerted negative influences on all ‘low–low’ ES interactions, which caused a reduced area in synergies, while in the southern semi-humid areas, FVC suppressed the ‘low–high’ trade-offs between ESs, indicating the adaptability of grassland restoration efforts. (3) The impact of human activities on ES interactions has increased in the last 10 years, and exhibited positive effects on the ‘low–low’ ES interactions in northern semi-arid areas. However, the expansion of trade-off between soil conservation and carbon sequestration warrants attention. This study offers important insights into understanding the spatial interactions among carbon, water, and soil-related ESs in drylands.
Suggested Citation
Ting Li & Yu Ren & Zemin Ai & Zhihong Qiao & Yanjiao Ren & Liyang Ma & Yadong Yang, 2024.
"Revealing the Spatial Interactions and Driving Factors of Ecosystem Services: Enlightenments under Vegetation Restoration,"
Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:4:p:511-:d:1375123
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
- Yuan Yao & Guohua He & Wei Li & Yong Zhao & Haihong Li & Fan He, 2023.
"Assessing the Influence of Water Conservancy Projects on China’s Reserve Resources for Cultivated Land,"
Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-20, September.
- Xinxin Guo & Yang Yang & Yi Zhang & Mohsen Kalantari & Jiali Sun & Weize Sun & Guofeng Guan & Guoming Du, 2024.
"The Spatiotemporal Correlation between Human Activity Intensity and the Evolution of Ecosystem Service Value in the Songnen Plain, China,"
Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-25, July.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:4:p:511-:d:1375123. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.