Author
Listed:
- Asma Hmaied
(Institut National Agronomique de Tunisie (INAT), 43 Av. Charles Nicolle, Tunis 1082, Tunisia
Laboratoire d’étude des Interactions Sol-Agrosystème-Hydrosystème (LISAH), University of Montpellier, INRAe, IRD, SupAgro Montpellier, 34000 Montpellier, France
Current address: INAT, Av. Charles Nicolle, Tunis 1082, Tunisia.
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Pascal Podwojewski
(Institut d’Ecologie et des Sciences de l’Environnement de Paris (iESS), IRD, SU, INRAe, CNRS, UPCité, UPEC, 93143 Bondy, Cedex, France)
- Ines Gharnouki
(Institut National Agronomique de Tunisie (INAT), 43 Av. Charles Nicolle, Tunis 1082, Tunisia
Centre de Recherches et Technologies des Eaux (CERTE), BP 273, Soliman 8020, Tunisia
Current address: INAT, Av. Charles Nicolle, Tunis 1082, Tunisia.)
- Hanene Chaabane
(Institut National Agronomique de Tunisie (INAT), 43 Av. Charles Nicolle, Tunis 1082, Tunisia)
- Claude Hammecker
(Laboratoire d’étude des Interactions Sol-Agrosystème-Hydrosystème (LISAH), University of Montpellier, INRAe, IRD, SupAgro Montpellier, 34000 Montpellier, France
Current address: INAT, Av. Charles Nicolle, Tunis 1082, Tunisia.
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
Abstract
The hydrological cycle is strongly affected by climate changes causing extreme weather events with long drought periods and heavy rainfall events. To predict the hydrological functioning of Tunisian catchments, modelling is an essential tool to estimate the consequences on water resources and to test the sustainability of the different land uses. Soil physical properties describing water flow are essential to feed the models and must therefore be determined all over the watershed. A simple but robust ring infiltration method combined with particle size distribution (PSD) analysis (BEST method) was used to evaluate and derive the retention properties and the hydraulic conductivities. Physically based and statistical pedotransfer functions based on PSD were compared to test their potential use for different types of Tunisian soils. The functional sensitivity of these parameters was assessed by employing the Hydrus-1D software (PC Progress, Prague, Czech Republic) for water balance computations. This evaluation process involved testing the responsiveness and accuracy of the parameters in simulating various water balance components within the model. The evaluation of soil hydraulic parameters across the three used models highlighted significant variations, demonstrating distinct characteristics in each model. While notable differences were evident overall, intriguing similarities emerged, particularly regarding saturated hydraulic conductivity between BEST and Rosetta, and the shape parameter ( n ) between Arya–Paris and Rosetta. These parallels indicate shared hydraulic properties among the models, underscoring areas of agreement amid their diverse results. Significant differences were shown for scale parameter α for the various methods employed. Marginal differences in evaporation and drainage were observed between the BEST and Arya–Paris methods, with Rosetta distinctly highlighting a disparity between physically based models and statistical models.
Suggested Citation
Asma Hmaied & Pascal Podwojewski & Ines Gharnouki & Hanene Chaabane & Claude Hammecker, 2024.
"Evaluation of Soil Hydraulic Properties in Northern and Central Tunisian Soils for Improvement of Hydrological Modelling,"
Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:3:p:385-:d:1358950
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:3:p:385-:d:1358950. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.