IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i3p384-d1358905.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Do Ecological Restoration Projects Affect Trade-Offs and Synergies between Ecosystem Services?

Author

Listed:
  • Yuhui Ji

    (School of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Miaomiao Xie

    (School of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
    Key Laboratory of Land Consolidation, Ministry of Natural Resources of the PR China, Guanying Yuan West 37, Beijing 100035, China)

  • Yunxuan Liu

    (School of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Renfen Zhu

    (School of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Zhuoyun Tang

    (School of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Rongwei Hu

    (School of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

Scientific ecosystem management requires the clarification of the synergic and trade-off relationship between ecosystem services, particularly in the environmentally delicate Loess Plateau region. Previous studies have indirectly deduced that ecological restoration projects affect ESRs by analyzing their impacts on ecosystem services, but there is no direct evidence from the existing research to show whether and to what extent different ecological restoration projects have an impact on trade-off synergies, which weakens the explanatory strength of ecological restoration projects as an important factor affecting ESRs. In this study, based on the spatial mapping of three pairs of relationships between three typical ESs in Fugu County, Shaanxi Province, and the relative contribution of each ecological restoration projects, as well as Ecosystem services and the relationship between them, were explored through the boosted regression tree modeling (BRT). This study proved that different ecological restoration projects have different impacts on ESRs. The results indicated that the three pairs of ESRs obtained among the three ecosystem services in Fugu County could be categorized into two types. The relationship between carbon storage and soil conservation and the relationship between carbon storage and water conservation CS–WC were spatially predominantly trade-offs, and their spatial distributions were highly similar. Various ecological restoration projects have varying effects on ESRs. The connection between ecological restoration projects and ESRs involves a nonlinear transformation, and the change varies from project to project. Based on the above findings, this study further explores the influence process of various types of ecological restoration projects on ESRs, and provides scientific support for optimizing ecosystem management and comprehensive management of the region.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuhui Ji & Miaomiao Xie & Yunxuan Liu & Renfen Zhu & Zhuoyun Tang & Rongwei Hu, 2024. "How Do Ecological Restoration Projects Affect Trade-Offs and Synergies between Ecosystem Services?," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:3:p:384-:d:1358905
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/3/384/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/3/384/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Leshan Du & Haiyan Liu & Haiou Liu & Wenhui Liu & Zhanjun Quan & Ying Zhang, 2024. "Value Assessment and Prediction of Regulating Ecosystem Services in Hainan Tropical Rainforest National Park, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-17, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:3:p:384-:d:1358905. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.