Author
Listed:
- Maria Catarina Paz
(RESILIENCE—Center for Regional Resilience and Sustainability, Escola Superior de Tecnologia do Barreiro, Instituto Politécnico de Setúbal, Rua Américo da Silva Marinho, 2839-001 Barreiro, Portugal)
- Nádia Luísa Castanheira
(Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária, Avenida da República, Quinta do Marquês (Edifício Sede), 2780-157 Oeiras, Portugal)
- Ana Marta Paz
(Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária, Avenida da República, Quinta do Marquês (Edifício Sede), 2780-157 Oeiras, Portugal)
- Maria Conceição Gonçalves
(Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária, Avenida da República, Quinta do Marquês (Edifício Sede), 2780-157 Oeiras, Portugal)
- Fernando Monteiro Santos
(Instituto Dom Luiz, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Campo Grande, Edifício C1, Piso 1, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal)
- Mohammad Farzamian
(Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária, Avenida da República, Quinta do Marquês (Edifício Sede), 2780-157 Oeiras, Portugal
Centre of Geographical Studies (CEG), IGOT, Universidade de Lisboa, 1600-276 Lisbon, Portugal)
Abstract
Electromagnetic induction (EMI) and electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) are geophysical techniques measuring soil electrical conductivity and providing insights into properties correlated with it to depths of several meters. EMI measures the apparent electrical conductivity (EC a , dS m −1 ) without physical contact, while ERT acquires apparent electrical resistivity (ER a , ohm m) using electrodes. Both involve mathematical inversion to obtain models of spatial distribution for soil electrical conductivity (σ, mS m −1 ) and electrical resistivity (ρ, ohm m), respectively, where ρ is the reciprocal of σ. Soil salinity can be assessed from σ over large areas using a calibration process consisting of a regression between σ and the electrical conductivity of the saturated soil paste extract (EC e , dS m −1 ), used as a proxy for soil salinity. This research aims to compare the prediction abilities of the faster EMI to the more reliable ERT for estimating σ and predicting soil salinity. The study conducted surveys and sampling at four locations with distinct salinity levels in Portugal, analysing the agreement between the techniques, and obtained 2D vertical soil salinity maps. In our case study, the agreement between EMI and ERT models was fairly good in three locations, with σ varying between 50 and 500 mS m −1 . However, this was not the case at location 4, where σ exceeded 1000 mS m −1 and EMI significantly underestimated σ when compared to ERT. As for soil salinity prediction, both techniques generally provided satisfactory and comparable regional-level predictions of EC e , and the observed underestimation in EMI models did not significantly affect the overall estimation of soil salinity. Consequently, EMI demonstrated an acceptable level of accuracy in comparison to ERT in our case studies, supporting confidence in utilizing this faster and more practical technique for measuring soil salinity over large areas.
Suggested Citation
Maria Catarina Paz & Nádia Luísa Castanheira & Ana Marta Paz & Maria Conceição Gonçalves & Fernando Monteiro Santos & Mohammad Farzamian, 2024.
"Comparison of Electromagnetic Induction and Electrical Resistivity Tomography in Assessing Soil Salinity: Insights from Four Plots with Distinct Soil Salinity Levels,"
Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, February.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:3:p:295-:d:1346685
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:3:p:295-:d:1346685. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.