IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i12p2186-d1544067.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolution and Predictive Analysis of Spatiotemporal Patterns of Habitat Quality in the Turpan–Hami Basin

Author

Listed:
  • Yaqian Li

    (College of Geography and Remote Sensing Sciences, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, China
    Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, China)

  • Yongqiang Liu

    (College of Geography and Remote Sensing Sciences, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, China
    Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, China)

  • Yan Qin

    (College of Geography and Remote Sensing Sciences, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, China
    Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, China)

  • Kun Zhang

    (College of Geography and Remote Sensing Sciences, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, China
    Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, China)

  • Reifat Enwer

    (College of Geography and Remote Sensing Sciences, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, China
    Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, China)

  • Weiping Wang

    (College of Geography and Remote Sensing Sciences, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, China
    Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, China)

  • Shuai Yuan

    (School of Remote Sensing and Information Engineering, Hubei LuoJia Laboratory, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)

Abstract

The expansion of urban areas and unsustainable land use associated with human activities have brought about a decline in habitat quality (HQ), especially in arid regions with fragile ecosystems. A precise prediction of land use and habitat quality changes across different scenarios is crucial for the sustainable maintenance of ecological diversity. In this article, the InVEST model was employed to assess both the quality and degradation levels of habitats in the Turpan–Hami Basin (THB) spanning 1990~2020. Additionally, the InVEST-PLUS coupling model was employed to forecast habitat conditions under three different scenarios in 2050. Specifically, it involved the comparison of land use changes and spatial distribution of HQ across natural development (ND) scenarios, town development (UD) scenarios, and ecological protection (EP) scenarios, along with the analysis of hot spots of HQ spanning 1990~2050. The outcomes revealed the following: (1) The primary land use in the THB was categorized as unused land, alongside notable expansions in cultivated land, grassland, and built-up land. Conversely, there was a considerable decline observed in forests, water bodies, and unused land spanning 1990~2020. (2) The HQ within the THB exhibited evident spatial clustering characteristics. Between 1990 and 2020, areas with low HQ accounted for over 85%, areas with unchanged HQ constituted 88.19%, areas experiencing deteriorated HQ comprised approximately 5.02%, and areas displaying improved HQ encompassed around 6.79%. (3) Through the comparison of HQ for the ND, UD, and EP scenarios in 2050, it was observed that the average HQ under the EP scenario ranked highest, exhibiting the lowest degree of degradation on average. This indicates that the EP scenario is most advantageous for preserving HQ. Conclusively, this research provides valuable viewpoints for making decisions aimed at enhancing HQ in ecologically fragile arid regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Yaqian Li & Yongqiang Liu & Yan Qin & Kun Zhang & Reifat Enwer & Weiping Wang & Shuai Yuan, 2024. "Evolution and Predictive Analysis of Spatiotemporal Patterns of Habitat Quality in the Turpan–Hami Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-20, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:12:p:2186-:d:1544067
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/12/2186/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/12/2186/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wei, Hejie & Liu, Huiming & Xu, Zihan & Ren, Jiahui & Lu, Nachuan & Fan, Weiguo & Zhang, Peng & Dong, Xiaobin, 2018. "Linking ecosystem services supply, social demand and human well-being in a typical mountain–oasis–desert area, Xinjiang, China," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(PA), pages 44-57.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bojie Wang & Haiping Tang & Qin Zhang & Fengqi Cui, 2020. "Exploring Connections among Ecosystem Services Supply, Demand and Human Well-Being in a Mountain-Basin System, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-15, July.
    2. Wen Liu & Long Ma & Jilili Abuduwaili, 2021. "Potentially Toxic Elements in Oasis Agricultural Soils Caused by High-Intensity Exploitation in the Piedmont Zone of the Tianshan Mountains, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Ruiming Xiao & Yuxuan Qiao & Xiaobin Dong & Huize Ren & Xuechao Wang & Peng Zhang & Qiaoru Ye & Xiaomin Xiao, 2024. "Ecosystem Health Assessment of the Manas River Basin: Application of the CC-PSR Model Improved by Coupling Coordination Degree," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-25, August.
    4. Valencia Torres, Angélica & Tiwari, Chetan & Atkinson, Samuel F., 2021. "Progress in ecosystem services research: A guide for scholars and practitioners," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    5. Tian Wang & Xiaodong Chen & Xin Zheng & Yayan Lu & Fang Han & Zhaoping Yang, 2022. "Identification of Priority Conservation Areas for Natural Heritage Sites Integrating Landscape Ecological Risks and Ecosystem Services: A Case Study in the Bogda, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-17, February.
    6. Qinqin Shi & Hai Chen & Di Liu & Tianwei Geng & Hang Zhang, 2022. "Identifying the Spatial Imbalance in the Supply and Demand of Cultural Ecosystem Services," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-20, May.
    7. Jianxiu Yang & Xing Ma & Xueyan Zhao & Wenqing Li, 2022. "Spatiotemporal of the Coupling Relationship between Ecosystem Services and Human Well-Being in Guanzhong Plain Urban Agglomeration," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-19, October.
    8. Yi Shang & Dongyan Wang & Hong Li, 2024. "Identification of Priority Areas for Ecological Restoration Based on Ecosystem Service Bundles and Human Activity Footprint in Western Jilin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-19, November.
    9. Jiake Shen & Yuncai Wang & Xiaolu Guo, 2021. "Identifying and Setting Linear Water Space Priorities in Co-Urbanized Area Based on Multiple Levels and Multiple Ecosystem Services," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-27, July.
    10. Huang, Qingxu & Yin, Dan & He, Chunyang & Yan, Jubo & Liu, Ziwen & Meng, Shiting & Ren, Qiang & Zhao, Rui & Inostroza, Luis, 2020. "Linking ecosystem services and subjective well-being in rapidly urbanizing watersheds: Insights from a multilevel linear model," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    11. Lyu, Rongfang & Zhao, Wenpeng & Pang, Jili & Tian, Xiaolei & Zhang, Jianming & Wang, Naiang, 2022. "Towards a sustainable nature reserve management: Using Bayesian network to quantify the threat of disturbance to ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    12. Siyuan He & Louise Gallagher & Qingwen Min, 2021. "Examining Linkages among Livelihood Strategies, Ecosystem Services, and Social Well-Being to Improve National Park Management," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-20, August.
    13. Zhengxin Ji & Yueqing Xu & Hejie Wei, 2020. "Identifying Dynamic Changes in Ecosystem Services Supply and Demand for Urban Sustainability: Insights from a Rapidly Urbanizing City in Central China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-23, April.
    14. Qingxiang Meng & Likun Zhang & Hejie Wei & Enxiang Cai & Dong Xue & Mengxue Liu, 2021. "Linking Ecosystem Service Supply–Demand Risks and Regional Spatial Management in the Yihe River Basin, Central China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-27, August.
    15. Chen, Dengshuai & Li, Jing & Yang, Xiaonan & Zhou, Zixiang & Pan, Yuqi & Li, Manchun, 2020. "Quantifying water provision service supply, demand and spatial flow for land use optimization: A case study in the YanHe watershed," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    16. Di Liu & Qifei Wang & Yayan Lu & Qinqin Shi & Jie Zhang, 2024. "The Impact of Individual Capabilities on Ecosystem Services and Farmers’ Well-Being: A Case Study of the Loess Plateau, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-23, April.
    17. Ranran Liu & Xiaobin Dong & Peng Zhang & Ying Zhang & Xiaowan Wang & Ya Gao, 2020. "Study on the Sustainable Development of an Arid Basin Based on the Coupling Process of Ecosystem Health and Human Wellbeing Under Land Use Change—A Case Study in the Manas River Basin, Xinjiang, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-25, February.
    18. Zhenjun Yan & Yirong Wang & Xu Hu & Wen Luo, 2023. "Assessment and Enhancement of Ecosystem Service Supply Efficiency Based on Production Possibility Frontier: A Case Study of the Loess Plateau in Northern Shaanxi," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-20, September.
    19. Hengkang Zhao & Xinyu Zhang & Wenqi Lu & Chenlin Wei & Dan He & Yakai Lei & Klaudia Borowiak, 2024. "Spatiotemporal Changes and Driving Mechanisms of Ecosystem Service Supply–Demand Contradictions Under Urbanization," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, November.
    20. Hongjuan Zhang & Qian Pang & Huan Long & Haochen Zhu & Xin Gao & Xiuqing Li & Xiaohui Jiang & Kang Liu, 2019. "Local Residents’ Perceptions for Ecosystem Services: A Case Study of Fenghe River Watershed," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-19, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:12:p:2186-:d:1544067. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.