IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i12p1995-d1527326.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Capitalising on the Floristic Survey as a Non-Destructive Line of Evidence for Mineral Potential Modelling: A Case Study of Bauxite in South-Western Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Lewis Trotter

    (School of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6845, Australia)

  • Grant Wardell-Johnson

    (School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6845, Australia)

  • Andrew Grigg

    (Environment Department, Alcoa of Australia Ltd., Pinjarra, WA 6208, Australia)

  • Sarah Luxton

    (Environment Division, Commonwealth Scientific and Research Organisation (CSIRO), Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia)

  • Todd P. Robinson

    (School of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6845, Australia)

Abstract

While geobotanists have long used plant occurrence to locate subsurface resources, none have utilised floristic surveys as evidence in models of mineral potential. Here, we combine plant species distributions with terrain metrics to produce predictive models showing the probability of bauxite presence. We identified nineteen taxa with statistically significant associations with known bauxite deposits and identified eleven terrain metrics from previous studies. We grouped variables into three variable sets (floristic, topographic, and topo-flora) and produced mineral potential models for each using four algorithms or approaches: (a) a generalised linear model (GLM); (b) random forest (RF); (c) maxent (ME); and (d) a heterogenous stacking ensemble (GLM-RF-ME). Overall, the random forest model outperformed all algorithms including the ensemble based on the area under the curve (AUC) metric. The floristic set of variables outperformed the topographic set (AUC: 0.86 v 0.82). However, together they had the greatest predictive capacity (AUC: 0.89). Six taxa, including Banksia grandis , Leucopogon verticillatus , and Persoonia longifolia , were indicators of bauxite presence, while five other taxa, including Xanthorrhoea preissii and Hypocalymma angustifolium , were associated with bauxite absence. Important topographic variables were topographic wetness, landscape position, and valley depth, which characterised bauxite locations as being well drained, in the upper slope positions of subdued hills, and at some distance from valleys. The addition of floristic surveys provides a new line of evidence about the overlying botanical life that tolerates, accumulates, or avoids bauxite or associated minerals. As opposed to drilling, both datasets can be collected and interrogated at low cost and without impact to the surrounding environment. These data are valuable additions to future applications of mineral potential modelling.

Suggested Citation

  • Lewis Trotter & Grant Wardell-Johnson & Andrew Grigg & Sarah Luxton & Todd P. Robinson, 2024. "Capitalising on the Floristic Survey as a Non-Destructive Line of Evidence for Mineral Potential Modelling: A Case Study of Bauxite in South-Western Australia," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-25, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:12:p:1995-:d:1527326
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/12/1995/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/12/1995/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:12:p:1995-:d:1527326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.