IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i12p1987-d1526665.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Soil-Water Retention Curves and Pore-Size Distribution in a Clay Loam Under Different Tillage Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Jay Jabro

    (Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Sidney, MT 59270, USA)

  • William Stevens

    (Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Sidney, MT 59270, USA)

  • William Iversen

    (Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Sidney, MT 59270, USA)

  • Upendra Sainju

    (Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Sidney, MT 59270, USA)

  • Brett Allen

    (Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Sidney, MT 59270, USA)

  • Sadikshya Dangi

    (Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Sidney, MT 59270, USA)

  • Chengci Chen

    (Eastern Ag Research Center, Montana State University, Sidney, MT 59270, USA)

Abstract

Tillage practices significantly impact soil structure, pore-size distribution (PSD), and soil-water retention curves (SWRC). The SWRC, which represents the relationship between soil water content and soil water potential, is important for various studies involving plants, soil, environment, irrigation, drainage, modeling, and hydrology. In this study, the HYPROP method was used to measure SWRCs and estimate soil physical and hydraulic properties under conventional tillage (CT), strip tillage (ST), and no-tillage (NT) systems in clay loam soil. Undisturbed soil cores were collected from 0–15 cm and 15–30 cm depths within sugarbeet rows, with sampling replicated five times following a randomized block design. Soil-water retention curves were modeled using the van Genuchten (vG) model for each depth under each tillage system. The results showed that none of the soil parameters from the vG equation, plant-available soil water content, or pore-size distribution were significantly influenced by tillage type. This lack of significant difference may be attributed to considerable soil disturbance from sugarbeet root harvesting, freeze and thaw cycles between tillage and sampling, or soil displacement caused by beet root growth. However, small differences in soil parameters among the three tillage systems were noted at both soil depths, due to minor variations in soil porosity and pore-size distribution. Regardless of the tillage system, understanding SWRC is essential for insights into soil and water processes such as water flow, soil water storage, and water availability for plants.

Suggested Citation

  • Jay Jabro & William Stevens & William Iversen & Upendra Sainju & Brett Allen & Sadikshya Dangi & Chengci Chen, 2024. "Soil-Water Retention Curves and Pore-Size Distribution in a Clay Loam Under Different Tillage Systems," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-13, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:12:p:1987-:d:1526665
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/12/1987/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/12/1987/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:12:p:1987-:d:1526665. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.