IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i12p1979-d1526195.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating Traditional Ecological Knowledge into Land Use and Land Cover Change Assessments, Pastoralist Communities in Northwest Inner Mongolia China

Author

Listed:
  • Siru A

    (Center for Studies of Ethnic Minorities in Northwest China, College of History and Culture, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China)

  • Bingxue Xie

    (Center for Studies of Ethnic Minorities in Northwest China, College of History and Culture, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China)

  • Menghe Wuliji

    (School of Ethnology and Sociology, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010021, China)

  • Lisheng Zhao

    (Center for Studies of Ethnic Minorities in Northwest China, College of History and Culture, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China)

Abstract

Land use and land cover (LULC) changes are the primary drivers of ecosystem transformation and have substantial impacts on local livelihoods. However, most research has focused on assessing the intensity of these changes in specific regions using remotely sensed data, thus generalizing trends and often overlooking the nuanced effects on local communities and their adaptive strategies. In this study, we integrated traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) with a remote sensing analysis to achieve a more comprehensive understanding of LULC changes and their social implications. Our results indicate that the grassland area in the studied region decreased significantly from 1985 to 2020, primarily due to socioeconomic development and rising temperatures, with a significant negative correlation observed between the size of the grassland area and livestock numbers. This loss of grassland has deeply affected the well-being and sustainability of pastoralist communities, whose livelihoods are intimately tied to grazing resources. A notable shift occurred around 2000; before this period, the grassland area was relatively stable, and camel populations were gradually declining. However, after 2000, grassland loss accelerated, accompanied by an increase in camel numbers. This trend reflects local herders’ adaptive strategies, as they leveraged ecological knowledge to adjust livestock composition in favor of camels, which are better suited to cope with the diminished grassland. By combining remote sensing data with TEK, we provide an integrated, longitudinal perspective on vegetation and livelihood changes. These insights are essential for shaping sustainable development policies in arid regions, where fostering ecological resilience and supporting community adaptation are critical.

Suggested Citation

  • Siru A & Bingxue Xie & Menghe Wuliji & Lisheng Zhao, 2024. "Integrating Traditional Ecological Knowledge into Land Use and Land Cover Change Assessments, Pastoralist Communities in Northwest Inner Mongolia China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-16, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:12:p:1979-:d:1526195
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/12/1979/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/12/1979/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Min & Huang, Jikun & Dries, Liesbeth & Heijman, Wim & Zhu, Xueqin, 2020. "How does land tenure reform impact upon pastoral livestock production? An empirical study for Inner Mongolia, China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    2. Melvani, Kamal & Myers, the Late Bronwyn & Stacey, Natasha & Bristow, Mila & Crase, Beth & Moles, Jerry, 2022. "Farmers’ values for land, trees and biodiversity underlie agricultural sustainability," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Min & Dries, Liesbeth & Huang, Jikun & Min, Shi & Tang, Jianjun, 2019. "The impacts of the eco-environmental policy on grassland degradation and livestock production in Inner Mongolia, China: An empirical analysis based on the simultaneous equation model," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    2. Lingling Hou & Pengfei Liu & Xiaohui Tian, 2023. "Grassland tenure reform and grassland quality in China," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 105(5), pages 1388-1404, October.
    3. Haibin Dong & Saheed Olaide Jimoh & Yulu Hou & Xiangyang Hou, 2020. "Willingness to Pay for Livestock Husbandry Insurance: An Empirical Analysis of Grassland Farms in Inner Mongolia, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-13, September.
    4. Li, Ang & Wu, Jianguo & Zhang, Xueyao & Xue, Jianguo & Liu, Zhifeng & Han, Xingguo & Huang, Jianhui, 2018. "China’s new rural “separating three property rights” land reform results in grassland degradation: Evidence from Inner Mongolia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 170-182.
    5. Liu, Min & Dries, Liesbeth & Heijman, Wim & Zhu, Xueqin & Deng, Xiangzheng & Huang, Jikun, 2019. "Land tenure reform and grassland degradation in Inner Mongolia, China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 181-198.
    6. Feng, Xiaolong & Qiu, Huanguang & Liu, Mingyue & Tang, Jianjun, 2024. "Innovation of grassland ecological governance systems: Synergy between government regulation and grassroots governance," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    7. Wang, Jizhe & Alita, Lita & Jiang, Ming & Nie, Zihan & Tu, Qin & Liu, Min, 2024. "Collective action in the pastural area of Inner Mongolia, China: Evidence from a lab-in-the-field experiment," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:12:p:1979-:d:1526195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.