IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i11p1956-d1524587.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of Life Cycle Assessment for Torrent Control Structures: A Review

Author

Listed:
  • Mirabela Marin

    (National Institute for Research and Development in Forestry “Marin Drăcea”, 077190 Voluntari, Romania)

  • Nicu Constantin Tudose

    (National Institute for Research and Development in Forestry “Marin Drăcea”, 077190 Voluntari, Romania)

  • Cezar Ungurean

    (National Institute for Research and Development in Forestry “Marin Drăcea”, 077190 Voluntari, Romania)

  • Alin Lucian Mihalache

    (National Institute for Research and Development in Forestry “Marin Drăcea”, 077190 Voluntari, Romania)

Abstract

Mountain areas are prone to the occurrence of extreme events, especially torrential floods, amplified by climatic and environmental changes. In this context, it is mandatory to increase resilience and guide decision-makers toward more effective measures. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is considered as a decision support tool that can provide the qualitative and quantitative criteria required by the Do No Significant Harm, thus contributing to a more accurate assessment of environmental impacts of the torrent control structures. This study aimed to investigate the current state of the LCA applications in the torrent control to provide practitioners perspectives for new research and a pathway for optimized LCA analysis. Our analysis reveals that in the torrent control area, these studies are still limited. Most of the papers considered Ecoinvent as the main database source and cradle to grave as the main system boundary. This study suggests that restoring the functional capacity of dams and other torrent control structures instead of demolition or decommissioning from the end-of-life stage will ensure an orientation towards more sustainable and circular strategies. Although strong partnerships and consistent efforts are needed, general findings reveal that LCA is a useful tool for moving towards more sustainable construction practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Mirabela Marin & Nicu Constantin Tudose & Cezar Ungurean & Alin Lucian Mihalache, 2024. "Application of Life Cycle Assessment for Torrent Control Structures: A Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:11:p:1956-:d:1524587
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/11/1956/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/11/1956/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aleta Lederwasch & Pierre Mukheibir, 2013. "The Triple Bottom Line and Progress toward Ecological Sustainable Development: Australia’s Coal Mining Industry as a Case Study," Resources, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-13, March.
    2. Huo, Jie & Peng, Chen, 2023. "Depletion of natural resources and environmental quality: Prospects of energy use, energy imports, and economic growth hindrances," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PA).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Chuangang & Li, Xin, 2024. "Optimizing the utilization of mineral assets and human resources for enhanced social welfare and sustainable development," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    2. Flávio José Simioni & Juliana Ferreira Soares & Jeane de Almeida do Rosário & Luiza Garcia Sell & Eduardo Bertol & Fabio Murilo Padilha Souza & Edvaldo Pereira Santos Júnior & Luiz Moreira Coelho Juni, 2024. "Industrial Symbiosis and Circular Economy Practices Towards Sustainability in Forest-Based Clusters: Case Studies in Southern Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Elisabete Nogueira & Sofia Gomes & João M. Lopes, 2022. "The Key to Sustainable Economic Development: A Triple Bottom Line Approach," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Zhang, Xiuqi & Meng, Xiangyu & Su, Chi Wei, 2024. "The security of energy import: Do economic policy uncertainty and geopolitical risk really matter?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 377-388.
    5. Massaro, L. & Calvimontes, J. & Ferreira, L.C. & de Theije, M., 2022. "Balancing economic development and environmental responsibility: Perceptions from communities of garimpeiros in the Brazilian Amazon," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    6. Xin Ma & Fen Jia, 2024. "Spatiotemporal Evolution and Convergence Analysis of Urban Economic Resilience in China—A Case Study of Jiangsu Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-19, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:11:p:1956-:d:1524587. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.