IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i11p1955-d1524430.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When Local Governments Plan to Give Their Past a Future: A State-Wide Analysis of Heritage Strategy Documents in New South Wales (Australia)

Author

Listed:
  • Dirk H. R. Spennemann

    (Gulbali Institute, Charles Sturt University, P.O. Box 789, Albury, NSW 2640, Australia)

Abstract

The authorized heritage discourse sensu Smith asserts that cultural heritage, and in particular heritage places, can be managed for the benefit of present and future generations through appropriate measures of identification, protection and conservation. Comprehensive planning at the individual place as well as community/local government level is the backbone to good management if ad hoc decisions are to be avoided. While all local government authorities (councils) in New South Wales (Australia) are mandated to produce Local Strategic Planning Statements with a ten-year horizon that may include statements related to heritage management, some councils also promulgated dedicated heritage strategies. So far, the nature and comprehensiveness of such planning instruments have never been formally investigated. This paper provides a state-wide analysis of Local Strategic Planning Statements and council heritage strategies in NSW. The review shows that the priorities expressed in heritage strategies are often mundane, with none of the strategies expressing aspirational priorities or actions. The value of heritage to a community is assumed axiomatically, with very few heritage strategies expressing a vision for why heritage management is of community relevance. Only a few heritage strategies demonstrate how they, and their strategic priorities, are interlinked with other local, let alone state-level, strategies and policies. Very few of the documents provide evidence for the basis on which the strategies are founded, such as canvassing public opinion, situational analysis or projections of demographic, social, societal and economic trajectories based on strategic foresight. This review highlights much room for improvement. In a post-modernist age of alternative truths, where trust in governments is declining, it is imperative that local government heritage strategies be grounded in the community, offer transparency in how priorities are decided and, above all, provide a clear and aspirational vision for the role that cultural heritage shall play in the community.

Suggested Citation

  • Dirk H. R. Spennemann, 2024. "When Local Governments Plan to Give Their Past a Future: A State-Wide Analysis of Heritage Strategy Documents in New South Wales (Australia)," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-46, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:11:p:1955-:d:1524430
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/11/1955/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/11/1955/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lucy Grimshaw & Lewis Mates, 2022. "‘It’s part of our community, where we live’: Urban heritage and children’s sense of place," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(7), pages 1334-1352, May.
    2. Ricardo Cardoso & Isabel Breda‐Vázquez, 2007. "Social Justice as a Guide to Planning Theory and Practice: Analyzing the Portuguese Planning System," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 384-400, June.
    3. Trang Le & Tho Tran, 2023. "An Evaluation of Local Comprehensive Plans Regarding Green Infrastructure in 52 Cities across the U.S. Gulf Coast Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-16, May.
    4. Schepis, Daniel, 2020. "Understanding Indigenous Reconciliation Action Plans from a corporate social responsibility perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    5. Angela Rosa & Angela Santangelo & Simona Tondelli, 2021. "Investigating the Integration of Cultural Heritage Disaster Risk Management into Urban Planning Tools. The Ravenna Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-24, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Blesia, Jhon Urasti & Dixon, Keith & Lord, Beverley Rae, 2023. "Indigenous experiences and perspectives on a mining corporation's community relations and development activities," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    2. Maria Iglesias-Mendoza & Akilu Yunusa-Kaltungo & Sara Hadleigh-Dunn & Ashraf Labib, 2021. "Learning How to Learn from Disasters through a Comparative Dichotomy Analysis: Grenfell Tower and Hurricane Katrina Case Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Amoako, Kwame Oduro & Lord, Beverley R. & Dixon, Keith, 2021. "Narrative accounting for mining in Ghana: An old defence against a new threat?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    4. Gerard A. Hoekveld, 2008. "Applied Geography And Ethics In Spatial Planning: The Dutch National Spatial Strategy 2006," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 99(2), pages 223-237, April.
    5. Mário Monteiro & Alexandre Oliveira Tavares, 2015. "What is the Influence of the Planning Framework on the Land Use Change Trajectories? Photointerpretation Analysis in the 1958–2011 Period for a Medium/Small Sized City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-29, August.
    6. Qi Li & Mei Liu & Jusheng Song & Yu Du & Fei Gao, 2022. "The Risk Map of Cross-Regional Cultural Heritage: From a Perspective of Slow Degradation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-24, October.
    7. Keqiang Wang & Jianglin Lu & Hongmei Liu & Fang Ye & Fangbin Dong & Xiaodan Zhu, 2023. "Spatial Justice and Residents’ Policy Acceptance: Evidence from Construction Land Reduction in Shanghai, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-19, January.
    8. Sandra Patrícia Marques Pereira & Pedro Miguel Alves Ribeiro Correia & Patrícia Jardim Da Palma & Liliana Pitacho & Fabrício Castagna Lunardi, 2022. "The Conceptual Model of Role Stress and Job Burnout in Judges: The Moderating Role of Career Calling," Laws, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, May.
    9. Vincent Tawiah & Reon Matemane & Babajide Oyewo & Tesfaye T. Lemma, 2024. "Saving the environment with indigenous directors: Evidence from Africa," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 2445-2461, March.
    10. Simone Mineo, 2023. "Natural Events Threatening the Cultural Heritage: Characterization, Prevention and Risk Management for a Sustainable Fruition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-4, January.
    11. Nisar Ali Khan & Camillo Nuti & Giorgio Monti & Mario Micheli, 2022. "Critical Review of Pakistani Current Legislation on Sustainable Protection of Cultural Heritage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, March.
    12. Francesca Trevisiol & Ester Barbieri & Gabriele Bitelli, 2022. "Multitemporal Thermal Imagery Acquisition and Data Processing on Historical Masonry: Experimental Application on a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-13, August.
    13. Angela Santangelo & Eleonora Melandri & Giulia Marzani & Simona Tondelli & Andrea Ugolini, 2022. "Enhancing Resilience of Cultural Heritage in Historical Areas: A Collection of Good Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-29, April.
    14. Ricardo Cardoso & Isabel Breda-Vázquez, 2009. "The Institutionalization of Just Decision Making: Analyzing Planning Practice in Portugal," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 27(3), pages 413-432, June.
    15. Luis Pablo Yon Secaida & Suguru Mori & Rie Nomura, 2023. "Assessment of Natural Disasters Impact on Cultural Mayan Heritage Spaces in Remotes Villages of Guatemala: Case of Black Salt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-34, August.
    16. Daniel Sampaio Tavares & Fernando Brandão Alves & Isabel Breda Vásquez, 2021. "The Relationship between Intangible Cultural Heritage and Urban Resilience: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-16, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:11:p:1955-:d:1524430. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.