IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i11p1856-d1516046.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Tree Object Segmentation Performance for Individual Tree Recognition Using Remote Sensing Techniques Based on Urban Forest Green Structures

Author

Listed:
  • Uk-Je Sung

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, Kyungpook National University, 80 Daehak-ro, Buk-gu, Daegu 41566, Republic of Korea)

  • Jeong-Hee Eum

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, Kyungpook National University, 80 Daehak-ro, Buk-gu, Daegu 41566, Republic of Korea)

  • Kyung-Jin Chung

    (Huron Network Co., Ltd., 5, Gunpocheomdansaneop 2-ro 22beon-gil, Gunpo-si 15880, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

This study evaluated whether tree object segmentation using remote sensing techniques could be effectively conducted according to the green structures of urban forests. The remote sensing techniques used were handheld LiDAR and UAV-based photogrammetry. The data collected from both methods were merged to complement each other’s limitations. The green structures of the study area were classified into three types based on the distance between canopy trees and the presence of shrubs. The ability to individually classify trees within each of the three types of green structures was then evaluated. The evaluation method was to assess the success rate by comparing the actual number of trees, which were visually counted in the field, with the number of tree objects classified in the study. To perform semantic segmentation of tree objects, a preprocessing step was conducted to extract only the data related to tree structures from the data collected through remote sensing techniques. The preprocessing steps included data merging, noise removal, separation of DTM and DSM, and separation of green areas and structures. The analysis results showed that tree object recognition was not efficient when the green structures were complex and mixed, and the recognition rate was highest when only canopy trees were present, and the canopies did not overlap. Therefore, when observing in high-density areas, the semantic segmentation algorithm’s variables should be adjusted to narrow the object recognition range, and additional observations in winter are needed to compensate for areas obscured by leaves. By improving data collection methods and systematizing the analysis methods according to the green structures, the object recognition process can be enhanced.

Suggested Citation

  • Uk-Je Sung & Jeong-Hee Eum & Kyung-Jin Chung, 2024. "Evaluation of Tree Object Segmentation Performance for Individual Tree Recognition Using Remote Sensing Techniques Based on Urban Forest Green Structures," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:11:p:1856-:d:1516046
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/11/1856/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/11/1856/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yam Bahadur KC & Qijing Liu & Pradip Saud & Damodar Gaire & Hari Adhikari, 2024. "Estimation of Above-Ground Forest Biomass in Nepal by the Use of Airborne LiDAR, and Forest Inventory Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-18, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:11:p:1856-:d:1516046. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.