IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i10p1665-d1497671.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Machine Learning Models for the Spatial Prediction of Gully Erosion Susceptibility in the Piraí Drainage Basin, Paraíba Do Sul Middle Valley, Southeast Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Jorge da Paixão Marques Filho

    (Departament of Geography, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21910-240, Brazil)

  • Antônio José Teixeira Guerra

    (Departament of Geography, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21910-240, Brazil)

  • Carla Bernadete Madureira Cruz

    (Departament of Geography, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21910-240, Brazil)

  • Maria do Carmo Oliveira Jorge

    (Departament of Geography, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21910-240, Brazil)

  • Colin A. Booth

    (School of Engineering, University of the West of England, Bristol BS16 1QY, UK)

Abstract

Soil erosion is a global issue—with gully erosion recognized as one of the most important forms of land degradation. The purpose of this study is to compare and contrast the outcomes of four machine learning models, Classification and Regression (CART), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Machine (SVM), used for mapping susceptibility to soil gully erosion. The controlling factors of gully erosion in the Piraí Drainage Basin, Paraíba do Sul Middle Valley were analysed by image interpretation in Google Earth and gully erosion samples (n = 159) were used for modelling and spatial prediction. The XGBoost and RF models achieved identical results for the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC = 88.50%), followed by the SVM and CART models, respectively (AUROC = 86.17%; AUROC = 85.11%). In all models analysed, the importance of the main controlling factors predominated among Lineaments, Land Use and Cover, Slope, Elevation and Rainfall, highlighting the need to understand the landscape. The XGBoost model, considering a smaller number of false negatives in spatial prediction, was considered the most appropriate, compared to the Random Forest model. It is noteworthy that the XGBoost model made it possible to validate the hypothesis of the study area, for susceptibility to gully erosion and identifying that 9.47% of the Piraí Drainage Basin is susceptible to gully erosion. Furthermore, replicable methodologies are evidenced by their rapid applicability at different scales.

Suggested Citation

  • Jorge da Paixão Marques Filho & Antônio José Teixeira Guerra & Carla Bernadete Madureira Cruz & Maria do Carmo Oliveira Jorge & Colin A. Booth, 2024. "Machine Learning Models for the Spatial Prediction of Gully Erosion Susceptibility in the Piraí Drainage Basin, Paraíba Do Sul Middle Valley, Southeast Brazil," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-21, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:10:p:1665-:d:1497671
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/10/1665/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/10/1665/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kennedy Were & Syphyline Kebeney & Harrison Churu & James Mumo Mutio & Ruth Njoroge & Denis Mugaa & Boniface Alkamoi & Wilson Ng’etich & Bal Ram Singh, 2023. "Spatial Prediction and Mapping of Gully Erosion Susceptibility Using Machine Learning Techniques in a Degraded Semi-Arid Region of Kenya," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-19, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:10:p:1665-:d:1497671. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.