IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i9p1776-d1239219.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Development of an Experimental Framework to Explore the Generative Design Preference of a Machine Learning-Assisted Residential Site Plan Layout

Author

Listed:
  • Pei Sun

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Fengying Yan

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Qiwei He

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Hongjiang Liu

    (China Architecture Design & Research Group, Beijing 100044, China)

Abstract

Generative design based on machine learning has become an important area of application for artificial intelligence. Regarding the generative design process for residential site plan layouts (hereafter referred to as “RSPLs”), the lack of experimental demonstration begs the question: what are the design preferences of machine learning? In this case, all design elements of the target object need to be extracted as much as possible to conduct experimental studies to produce scientific experimental results. Based on this, the Pix2pix model was used as the test case for Chinese residential areas in this study. An experimental framework of “extract-translate-machine-learning-evaluate” is proposed, combining different machine and manual computations, as well as quantitative and qualitative evaluation techniques, to jointly determine which design elements and their characteristic representations are machine learning design preferences in the field of RSPL. The results show that machine learning can assist in optimizing the design of two particular RSPL elements to conform to residential site layout plans: plaza paving and landscaped green space. In addition, two other major elements, public facilities and spatial structures, were also found to exhibit more significant design preferences, with the largest percentage increase in the number of changes required after machine learning. Finally, the experimental framework established in this study compensates for the lack of consideration that all design elements of a residential area simultaneously utilize the same methodological framework. This can also assist planners in developing solutions that better meet the expectations of residents and can clarify the potential and advantageous directions for the application of machine learning-assisted RSPL.

Suggested Citation

  • Pei Sun & Fengying Yan & Qiwei He & Hongjiang Liu, 2023. "The Development of an Experimental Framework to Explore the Generative Design Preference of a Machine Learning-Assisted Residential Site Plan Layout," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-22, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:9:p:1776-:d:1239219
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/9/1776/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/9/1776/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhenwei Wang & Xiaochun Wang & Zijin Dong & Lisan Li & Wangjun Li & Shicheng Li, 2023. "More Urban Elderly Care Facilities Should Be Placed in Densely Populated Areas for an Aging Wuhan of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen Li & Jiaji Wu & Yi Huang, 2023. "Spatial–Temporal Patterns and Coupling Characteristics of Rural Elderly Care Institutions in China: Sustainable Human Settlements Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-27, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:9:p:1776-:d:1239219. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.