IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i9p1718-d1231910.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preservation of Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) through Ecosystems’ Soil Retention Services in China

Author

Listed:
  • Enming Rao

    (School of Geography and Resource Sciences, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610101, China
    State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China)

  • Yi Xiao

    (State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China)

  • Fei Lu

    (State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China)

  • Hongbo Yang

    (State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China)

  • Zhiyun Ouyang

    (State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China)

Abstract

Soil erosion exerts a profound impact on the stocks of soil organic carbon (SOC), disrupting the carbon cycle and contributing to global warming. Through its role in mitigating soil erosion, the soil retention service of ecosystems holds the potential to stabilize and safeguard the SOC reservoir. This facet has yet to be comprehensively investigated. In this study, we quantified the preservation of SOC resulting from soil retention services in China, achieved by estimating both actual SOC erosion and potential SOC erosion using the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE). We find that (1) annually, SOC erosion in China amounted to 0.10 Pg C, primarily concentrated in croplands (47.8%), grasslands (21.2%), and barren lands (15.7%). Noteworthy hotspots emerged within the Soil and Water Conservation Divisions (SWCD) of key regions like the Tibetan Plateau (TP), the southwestern purple soil region (SW), and the karst region (KT). (2) The soil retention service curtailed the loss of a substantial 4.18 Pg C of SOC per year, predominantly attributed to forest ecosystems (66.1%). Hotspots of this preservation were clustered in the SWCD of the southern red soil region (SR), KT, and TP. These outcomes highlighted the critical role of soil retention services in preventing considerable carbon losses from terrestrial ecosystems. It significantly contributes to climate change mitigation and warrants recognition as an important nature-based solution in the pursuit of carbon neutrality. Forest ecosystems emerge as paramount in SOC preservation, which will be further improved with forest restoration. Beyond addressing soil erosion, future endeavors in soil and water conservation must equally address SOC erosion to comprehensively tackle carbon loss concerns.

Suggested Citation

  • Enming Rao & Yi Xiao & Fei Lu & Hongbo Yang & Zhiyun Ouyang, 2023. "Preservation of Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) through Ecosystems’ Soil Retention Services in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-12, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:9:p:1718-:d:1231910
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/9/1718/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/9/1718/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adrian Chappell & Jeffrey Baldock & Jonathan Sanderman, 2016. "The global significance of omitting soil erosion from soil organic carbon cycling schemes," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 6(2), pages 187-191, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sartori, Martina & Ferrari, Emanuele & M'Barek, Robert & Philippidis, George & Boysen-Urban, Kirsten & Borrelli, Pasquale & Montanarella, Luca & Panagos, Panos, 2024. "Remaining Loyal to Our Soil: A Prospective Integrated Assessment of Soil Erosion on Global Food Security," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    2. Tian Tian & Zhenqi Yang & Jianying Guo & Tiegang Zhang & Ziwei Wang & Ping Miao, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Evolution of Soil Erosion and Its Driving Mechanism in the Mongolian Section of the Yellow River Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Yuanli Zhu & Wenbo Li & Dongyan Wang & Zihao Wu & Peng Shang, 2022. "Spatial Pattern of Soil Erosion in Relation to Land Use Change in a Rolling Hilly Region of Northeast China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, August.
    4. Joan P. Casas-Ruiz & Pascal Bodmer & Kelly Ann Bona & David Butman & Mathilde Couturier & Erik J. S. Emilson & Kerri Finlay & Hélène Genet & Daniel Hayes & Jan Karlsson & David Paré & Changhui Peng & , 2023. "Integrating terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems to constrain estimates of land-atmosphere carbon exchange," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    5. Jing Tian & Jennifer A. J. Dungait & Ruixing Hou & Ye Deng & Iain P. Hartley & Yunfeng Yang & Yakov Kuzyakov & Fusuo Zhang & M. Francesca Cotrufo & Jizhong Zhou, 2024. "Microbially mediated mechanisms underlie soil carbon accrual by conservation agriculture under decade-long warming," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Liu, Jinxun & Sleeter, Benjiamin & Selmants, Paul C. & Diao, Jiaojiao & Zhou, Qiang & Worstell, Bruce & Moritsch, Monica, 2021. "Modeling watershed carbon dynamics as affected by land cover change and soil erosion," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 459(C).
    7. Zhu, Zhizhuo & Li, Long & Zhang, Shangxuan & Zhang, Peng & Ren, Yanan & Zhang, Yu, 2024. "Dynamic simulation study of soil erosion intensity on slopes with different vegetation patterns in pisha sandstone area," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 491(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:9:p:1718-:d:1231910. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.