IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i6p1261-d1174962.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lodgepole Pine and White Spruce Thinning in Alberta―A Review of North American and European Best Practices

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Baah-Acheamfour

    (Centre for Boreal Research, Northern Alberta Institute of Technology, Peace River, AB T8S 1R2, Canada)

  • Amanda Schoonmaker

    (Centre for Boreal Research, Northern Alberta Institute of Technology, Peace River, AB T8S 1R2, Canada)

  • Mark Dewey

    (School of Applied Sciences and Technology, Northern Alberta Institute of Technology, Edmonton, AB T5G 2R1, Canada)

  • Brian Roth

    (Forest Growth Organization of Western Canada, fRI Research, Hinton, AB T7V 1V3, Canada)

Abstract

A significant portion of the harvested land base in western Canada is becoming old enough or entering a phase where thinning is a legitimate forest management option. A comprehensive review of the existing knowledge of commercial thinning (CT) treatments applied to pine and spruce-dominated stands in Alberta was conducted, with particular regard to the intensity, timing of interventions, method, and impacts on crop tree growth responses. Although the geographical focus of this review is Alberta, information on this topic is more complete in other areas of North America and Europe, where there is a long history of density management. In areas of eastern North America, our review revealed that CT from below, with tree removal levels from 27 to 43% of the basal area, could increase total merchantable wood produced from 11 to 60 m 3 ha −1 over a rotation, depending on stand age and intensity of thinning. For Alberta conditions, and considering the risks, we conclude that commercial thinning basal area removal should be in the range of 25 to 40%, depending on a variety of factors such as species, wind firmness, and insect or disease incidence and risk. Thinning too aggressively and/or too late will increase the blowdown risk but the literature is fairly consistent in suggesting that live crown ratios should be >40% to maximize the chance of growth response and minimize the blowdown risk. In cases where stands are also threatened by stressors such as drought, wind, and insect or disease outbreaks, CT treatments likely offer the potential at limiting the overall risk, but localized knowledge and experience are critical. It is intended that the information presented may support ongoing and future research trials and growth and yield (G&Y) model development about potential CT treatments to apply and the likely results of practical application to commercial forestry.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Baah-Acheamfour & Amanda Schoonmaker & Mark Dewey & Brian Roth, 2023. "Lodgepole Pine and White Spruce Thinning in Alberta―A Review of North American and European Best Practices," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-24, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:6:p:1261-:d:1174962
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/6/1261/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/6/1261/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:6:p:1261-:d:1174962. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.