IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i3p712-d1102105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Do I See What You See?”—Differentiation of Stakeholders in Assessing Heritage Significance of Neighbourhood Attributes

Author

Listed:
  • Lidwine Spoormans

    (Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, 2628 BL Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Darinka Czischke

    (Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, 2628 BL Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Ana Pereira Roders

    (Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, 2628 BL Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Wessel de Jonge

    (Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, 2628 BL Delft, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Although attention for citizen involvement in urban development and heritage management processes is growing, both in practice and in research, the specifics of stakeholders’ interests have been less researched. This paper reveals and discusses the assessment by individuals and groups, to differentiate stakeholders, based on the heritage significance they convey on neighbourhood attributes. Fifty-nine interviews on a Dutch neighbourhood in Amsterdam Zuidoost were analysed integrating quantitative and qualitative methods. Results confirm important differences between and within stakeholder groups regarding their interest in particular attribute categories and scales, indicating the need to further specify stakeholders beyond the commonly used ‘community’ and ‘experts’. The identification of stakeholder interests is important to involve relevant groups in the identification and designation of significant attributes, buildings, and areas and to anticipate potential conflicts or shared interests in neighbourhood renovation processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Lidwine Spoormans & Darinka Czischke & Ana Pereira Roders & Wessel de Jonge, 2023. "“Do I See What You See?”—Differentiation of Stakeholders in Assessing Heritage Significance of Neighbourhood Attributes," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:3:p:712-:d:1102105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/3/712/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/3/712/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ilaria Rosetti & Clara Bertrand Cabral & Ana Pereira Roders & Marc Jacobs & Rosana Albuquerque, 2022. "Heritage and Sustainability: Regulating Participation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-27, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pattarachit Choompol Gozzoli & Theerada Rongrat & Roberto Bruno Gozzoli, 2022. "Design Thinking and Urban Community Development: East Bangkok," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-25, March.
    2. Nefo Indra Nizar & Nunung Nuryartono & Bambang Juanda & Akhmad Fauzi, 2024. "Can Knowledge and Culture Eradicate Poverty and Reduce Income Inequality? The Evidence from Indonesia," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 6425-6450, June.
    3. Serena Viola, 2022. "Built Heritage Repurposing and Communities Engagement: Symbiosis, Enabling Processes, Key Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    4. ElSayed A. Elnashar & Liliana Indrie & Dorina Camelia Ilieş & Zlatin Zlatev & Grigore Vasile Herman & Cristina Secan & Jan A. Wendt, 2022. "Rare Romanian Ethnographic Textiles—Reverse Engineering of Fabrics for Fashion Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-17, June.
    5. Yihao Wu & Yang Liu, 2023. "Transforming Industrial Waterfronts into Inclusive Landscapes: A Project Method and Investigation of Landscape as a Medium for Sustainable Revitalization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:3:p:712-:d:1102105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.