IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i2p378-d1052058.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revisiting Vegetation Gradient Analysis and the Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis for the Interpretation of Riverine Geomorphic Patterns

Author

Listed:
  • Tommaso Sitzia

    (Department of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry, Università degli Studi di Padova, Viale dell’Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy
    National Biodiversity Future Center (NBFC), Piazza Marina 61, 90133 Palermo, Italy)

  • Simone Iacopino

    (Department of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry, Università degli Studi di Padova, Viale dell’Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy)

  • Edoardo Alterio

    (Department of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry, Università degli Studi di Padova, Viale dell’Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy)

  • Francesco Comiti

    (Faculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bozen, Universitätsplatz 5, 39100 Bolzano, Italy)

  • Nicola Surian

    (Department of Geosciences, Università degli Studi di Padova, Via Gradenigo, 6, 35131 Padova, Italy)

  • Luca Mao

    (Department of Geography, University of Lincoln, Brayford Pool, Lincoln LN6 7TS, UK)

  • Mario Aristide Lenzi

    (Department of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry, Università degli Studi di Padova, Viale dell’Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy)

  • Thomas Campagnaro

    (Department of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry, Università degli Studi di Padova, Viale dell’Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy
    National Biodiversity Future Center (NBFC), Piazza Marina 61, 90133 Palermo, Italy)

  • Lorenzo Picco

    (Department of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry, Università degli Studi di Padova, Viale dell’Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy)

Abstract

Human effects on the water economy of the river systems are currently well documented at the worldwide scale, impacting a range of ecosystem services. In this perspective article, we discuss the findings of recent papers that under different intensities of human disturbance have coupled the analyses of riverine geomorphological and plant community patterns. The discussion is carried out within the historical framework of past and current methods of sampling and analysing the river geomorphology and the plant communities along cross-sectional profiles. The research has been conducted along three major gravel-bed rivers of the south-eastern Italian Alps: Brenta, Piave, and Tagliamento. The collated and summarised results here demonstrate the existence of a strong relationship between the woody species variance that can be explained by geomorphologic patterns and human disturbance intensity. The less disturbed river has an intermediate value of species variance that can be explained by geomorphology, the intermediate-disturbed river has the highest value, and the highly disturbed river has the lowest value. Then, we proposed an interpretation key and an adaptation of the intermediate disturbance hypothesis, which reads as: “in rivers, the greatest influence of geomorphic properties on vegetation occurs in the moderate or middle ranges of a human disturbance gradient”. We argue that the “influence of the geomorphic properties on vegetation” is assessed through the species constrained variance through an ordination analysis, such as that which is explained here. The most recent collection techniques based on field survey and remote sensing are making it increasingly easy and accurate to study of the trends of geomorphic and plant community variables throughout time and space. Thus, we encourage that researchers should check whether and how our observation is conserved through different groups of taxa and intensities of natural and human disturbance.

Suggested Citation

  • Tommaso Sitzia & Simone Iacopino & Edoardo Alterio & Francesco Comiti & Nicola Surian & Luca Mao & Mario Aristide Lenzi & Thomas Campagnaro & Lorenzo Picco, 2023. "Revisiting Vegetation Gradient Analysis and the Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis for the Interpretation of Riverine Geomorphic Patterns," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:2:p:378-:d:1052058
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/2/378/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/2/378/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:2:p:378-:d:1052058. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.