Author
Listed:
- Ilze Ozola
(Latvian State Forest Research Institute “Silava”, Rigas iela 111, LV-2169 Salaspils, Latvia
Lake and Peatland Research Centre, LV-4063 Limbazi, Latvia)
- Iluta Dauskane
(Lake and Peatland Research Centre, LV-4063 Limbazi, Latvia
Faculty of Biology, University of Latvia, Jelgavas iela 1, LV-1004 Riga, Latvia)
- Ieva Aunina
(Klasmann-Deilmann Latvia, LV-4222 Zilaiskalns, Latvia)
- Normunds Stivrins
(Lake and Peatland Research Centre, LV-4063 Limbazi, Latvia
Department of Geography, University of Latvia, Jelgavas iela 1, LV-1004 Riga, Latvia
Department of Geology, Tallinn University of Technology, Ehitajate tee 5, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia)
Abstract
Global climate change impact has increased in recent decades and put urgency on implementing effective climate change mitigation (CCM) activities. Rewetting of drained peatlands is an acknowledged measure to reduce GHG emissions from organic soils in the agriculture and land use sectors. Under waterlogged conditions, decomposition of organic matter in peat decreases, and emissions of CO 2 are reduced. Thus, the soil carbon stock is saved, and wet management of the site reactivates carbon sequestration. To reach CCM targets, the first rewetting and paludiculture trials have been implemented in Latvia. In this article, we review the current status of paludiculture in Latvia and evaluate the pros and cons of their wider implementation. The majority of paludiculture projects and pilot studies in Latvia have not been published so far and are reported here for the first time. Our assessment of paludiculture shows that trails on Alnus , Phalaris , Phragmites , Sphagnum , and Typha installed by the private enterprises have promising results for upcoming large-scale implementation. There are available areas for paludiculture in Latvia, but the current legislation and national framework policies (environment, agriculture, forest, and climate) do not fully support such activities yet and must be adapted.
Suggested Citation
Ilze Ozola & Iluta Dauskane & Ieva Aunina & Normunds Stivrins, 2023.
"Paludiculture in Latvia—Existing Knowledge and Challenges,"
Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-19, November.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:11:p:2039-:d:1277236
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:11:p:2039-:d:1277236. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.