IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i11p2003-d1272201.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Plant Conservation in the Midst of Energy Transition: Can Regional Governments Rise to the Challenge?

Author

Listed:
  • Estrella Alfaro-Saiz

    (Research Team Taxonomy and Biodiversity Conservation TaCoBi, Department of Biodiversity and Environmental Management, University of León, 24071 León, Spain
    Herbarium LEB Jaime Andrés Rodríguez, Vicerrectorado de Investigación, University of León, 24071 León, Spain)

  • Ana Belén Fernández-Salegui

    (Research Team Taxonomy and Biodiversity Conservation TaCoBi, Department of Biodiversity and Environmental Management, University of León, 24071 León, Spain)

  • Carmen Acedo

    (Research Team Taxonomy and Biodiversity Conservation TaCoBi, Department of Biodiversity and Environmental Management, University of León, 24071 León, Spain)

Abstract

Within the expanding wind energy projects context, this study explores the intricate relationship between biodiversity conservation and wind power development in the Cantabrian Mountains. By analyzing data from 1107 UTM grids measuring 10 × 10 km, we have identified 378 endangered vascular plant taxa and 36 bryophytes, including 135 that are regional endemics. Wind power complexes pose a significant risk of irreversible impacts on plant conservation zones and their integrity if proper management informed by the best available scientific knowledge is not implemented. This study introduces the concept of very important plant areas (VIPAs) as a crucial tool for identifying priority conservation areas. A total of 60% of the UTM grids were classified in the “high conservation value” category. Among the endangered species within the region, only 11% are afforded protection at the European level and 17% at the national level, leaving a key role for regional governments with heterogeneous lists. Our findings highlight the urgent need for legislation that accommodates updates to protected species lists, ensuring the inclusion of high-risk taxa and legally binding mechanisms at various administrative tiers. The proposed method relies on quantifiable and repeatable criteria, making it adaptable for application in other territories and for broader land use planning purposes.

Suggested Citation

  • Estrella Alfaro-Saiz & Ana Belén Fernández-Salegui & Carmen Acedo, 2023. "Plant Conservation in the Midst of Energy Transition: Can Regional Governments Rise to the Challenge?," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-22, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:11:p:2003-:d:1272201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/11/2003/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/11/2003/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gasparatos, Alexandros & Doll, Christopher N.H. & Esteban, Miguel & Ahmed, Abubakari & Olang, Tabitha A., 2017. "Renewable energy and biodiversity: Implications for transitioning to a Green Economy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 161-184.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang Shen & Xiuwu Zhang, 2022. "Study on the Impact of Environmental Tax on Industrial Green Transformation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Maren Helen Meyer & Sandra Dullau & Pascal Scholz & Markus Andreas Meyer & Sabine Tischew, 2023. "Bee-Friendly Native Seed Mixtures for the Greening of Solar Parks," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, June.
    3. Daniel Ştefan Armeanu & Georgeta Vintilă & Ştefan Cristian Gherghina, 2017. "Does Renewable Energy Drive Sustainable Economic Growth? Multivariate Panel Data Evidence for EU-28 Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-21, March.
    4. Eksi, Guner & Karaosmanoglu, Filiz, 2017. "Combined bioheat and biopower: A technology review and an assessment for Turkey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1313-1332.
    5. Segura, E. & Morales, R. & Somolinos, J.A., 2018. "A strategic analysis of tidal current energy conversion systems in the European Union," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 527-551.
    6. Fernando Lezama & Ricardo Faia & Pedro Faria & Zita Vale, 2020. "Demand Response of Residential Houses Equipped with PV-Battery Systems: An Application Study Using Evolutionary Algorithms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, May.
    7. Dhunny, A.Z. & Allam, Z. & Lobine, D. & Lollchund, M.R., 2019. "Sustainable renewable energy planning and wind farming optimization from a biodiversity perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 1282-1297.
    8. Jåstad, Eirik Ogner & Bolkesjø, Torjus Folsland, 2023. "Modelling emission and land-use impacts of altered bioenergy use in the future energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    9. Mihaela Simionescu & Yuriy Bilan & Emília Krajňáková & Dalia Streimikiene & Stanisław Gędek, 2019. "Renewable Energy in the Electricity Sector and GDP per Capita in the European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-15, June.
    10. Jiang Du & Mengqin Zhao & Ming Zeng & Kezhen Han & Huaping Sun, 2020. "Spatial Effects of Urban Agglomeration on Energy Efficiency: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-19, April.
    11. Abdul Ghani Olabi & Nabila Shehata & Hussein M. Maghrabie & Lobna A. Heikal & Mohammad Ali Abdelkareem & Shek Mohammod Atiqure Rahman & Sheikh Khaleduzzaman Shah & Enas Taha Sayed, 2022. "Progress in Solar Thermal Systems and Their Role in Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-31, December.
    12. Maria C. Fotopoulou & Panagiotis Drosatos & Stefanos Petridis & Dimitrios Rakopoulos & Fotis Stergiopoulos & Nikolaos Nikolopoulos, 2021. "Model Predictive Control for the Energy Management in a District of Buildings Equipped with Building Integrated Photovoltaic Systems and Batteries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-21, June.
    13. Coilín ÓhAiseadha & Gerré Quinn & Ronan Connolly & Michael Connolly & Willie Soon, 2020. "Energy and Climate Policy—An Evaluation of Global Climate Change Expenditure 2011–2018," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-49, September.
    14. Olga Laiza Kupika & Edson Gandiwa & Godwell Nhamo, 2019. "Green economy initiatives in the face of climate change: experiences from the Middle Zambezi Biosphere Reserve, Zimbabwe," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 2507-2533, October.
    15. Willsteed, Edward A. & Jude, Simon & Gill, Andrew B. & Birchenough, Silvana N.R., 2018. "Obligations and aspirations: A critical evaluation of offshore wind farm cumulative impact assessments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2332-2345.
    16. Alexandra Vrînceanu & Ines Grigorescu & Monica Dumitrașcu & Irena Mocanu & Cristina Dumitrică & Dana Micu & Gheorghe Kucsicsa & Bianca Mitrică, 2019. "Impacts of Photovoltaic Farms on the Environment in the Romanian Plain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-18, July.
    17. Jan Macháč & Lenka Zaňková, 2020. "Renewables—To Build or Not? Czech Approach to Impact Assessment of Renewable Energy Sources with an Emphasis on Municipality Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-15, December.
    18. Alexey Cherepovitsyn & Evgeniya Rutenko, 2022. "Strategic Planning of Oil and Gas Companies: The Decarbonization Transition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-26, August.
    19. David Milesi-Gaches, 2020. "Assessing implications of different energy sources: Quito, Ecuador [Évaluation des implications de différentes sources d'énergie : Quito, Équateur]," Working Papers hal-03555312, HAL.
    20. Arshed, Noman & Anwar, Aftab & Abbas, Manzir & Mughal, Waheed, 2024. "Natural habitat vs human in competition for breathing space: Need for restructuring clean energy infrastructure," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:11:p:2003-:d:1272201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.