IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i10p1877-d1254342.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Groundwater Potential Zones Assessment Using Geospatial Models in Semi-Arid Areas of South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Gbenga Olamide Adesola

    (Department of Geology, University of Fort Hare, 1 King William’s Town Road, Alice 5700, South Africa)

  • Kgabo Humphrey Thamaga

    (Department of GIS and Remote Sensing, University of Fort Hare, 1 King William’s Town Road, Alice 5700, South Africa)

  • Oswald Gwavava

    (Department of Geology, University of Fort Hare, 1 King William’s Town Road, Alice 5700, South Africa)

  • Benedict Kinshasa Pharoe

    (Department of Geology, University of Fort Hare, 1 King William’s Town Road, Alice 5700, South Africa)

Abstract

Water resources are under tremendous pressure as a result of the growing demand for water to meet human needs. Hence, it is necessary to delineate groundwater potential zones (GWPZs) to sustainably develop and manage groundwater resources. In this study, the geospatial-based analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and frequency ratio (FR) techniques were used to identify the GWPZs. Seven factors (geology, rainfall, slope, lineament density, soil, drainage density, and land use/land cover), which partially or entirely influence the groundwater potentiality of an area, were accessed separately and later combined to create GWPZ maps. Weights and ranks were assigned to the factors to perform the AHP model using existing knowledge. The FR was performed by calculating the percentage ratio between the dependent variable (boreholes) and the independent variable (factors). The preparation of the contributing factors and the creation of the resulting models was done using ArcGIS 10.8. The final GWPZ maps were classified into five zones: very low, low, moderate, high, and very high. About 80 boreholes in the study area were randomly subset into training and testing datasets; 58% were used for model training, and the remaining 42% were used for validation purposes. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the GWPZs models were generated, and the areas under the curves (AUC) were calculated. Validation of the models shows that the FR model is more efficient (85.3% accuracy) than the AHP model (83.2% accuracy). The findings show that the AHP and FR models are reliable and can be adopted to characterize GWPZs in arid or semi-arid environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Gbenga Olamide Adesola & Kgabo Humphrey Thamaga & Oswald Gwavava & Benedict Kinshasa Pharoe, 2023. "Groundwater Potential Zones Assessment Using Geospatial Models in Semi-Arid Areas of South Africa," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-20, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:10:p:1877-:d:1254342
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/10/1877/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/10/1877/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Solomon Temidayo Owolabi & Kakaba Madi & Ahmed Mukalazi Kalumba, 2021. "Comparative evaluation of spatio-temporal attributes of precipitation and streamflow in Buffalo and Tyume Catchments, Eastern Cape, South Africa," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 4236-4251, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Solomon Temidayo Owolabi & Johanes A. Belle & Sonwabo Mazinyo, 2022. "Quantifying Intra-Catchment Streamflow Processes and Response to Climate Change within a Climatic Transitional Zone: A Case Study of Buffalo Catchment, Eastern Cape, South Africa," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(16), pages 1-20, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:10:p:1877-:d:1254342. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.