IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2022i1p80-d1016159.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Topographic Perspective on the Propensity for Degradation of Plateau Swampy Meadows in Maduo County, West China

Author

Listed:
  • Xilai Li

    (Key Laboratory of the Alpine Grassland Ecology in the Three Rivers Region at Ministry of Education, College of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, Qinghai University, Xining 810016, China)

  • Jing Zhang

    (Key Laboratory of the Alpine Grassland Ecology in the Three Rivers Region at Ministry of Education, College of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, Qinghai University, Xining 810016, China)

  • Jay Gao

    (School of Environment, University of Auckland, New Zealand Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand)

Abstract

The swampy meadows atop the vast Qinghai–Tibet Plateau in West China fall into alpine, pediment, valley, floodplain, terrace, lacustrine, and riverine types according to their hydro-geomorphic properties. They have suffered degradation to various levels of severity due to climate change and external disturbance. In this paper, we studied the propensity of these types of swampy meadows to degrade from the topographic perspective. Evaluated against four degradation indicators of vegetation, hydrology, soil erosion, and pika ( Ochotona curzoniae ) damage, degradation severity at 106 swampy meadows representing all types of wetlands was graded to one of four levels, from which the field-based propensity to degrade (PtD) index value was derived. Judged against this index, terrace and alpine swampy meadows are the most prone to degradation while valley, lacustrine, and riverine swampy meadows are the least. The index value of a given swampy meadow type bears a close relationship (R 2 = 0.916) with its rate of change during 1990–2013, which confirms the validity of the proposed index in predicting the propensity of swampy meadows to change. The observed differential PtD of different types of swampy meadows is attributed primarily to elevation (R 2 = 0.746; p = 0.027) and, secondarily, to surface morphology (R 2 = 0.696; p = 0.039). Thus, the elevation at which a swampy meadow is situated is a more important factor to its PtD than its surface morphology. In particular, swampy meadows located at a higher elevation with a convex surface are much more prone to degradation than those at a lower elevation of a concave slope. Such findings can guide the proper management of different types of swampy meadows to achieve sustainable animal husbandry.

Suggested Citation

  • Xilai Li & Jing Zhang & Jay Gao, 2022. "A Topographic Perspective on the Propensity for Degradation of Plateau Swampy Meadows in Maduo County, West China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:80-:d:1016159
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/1/80/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/1/80/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen M. Chignell & Melinda J. Laituri & Nicholas E. Young & Paul H. Evangelista, 2019. "Afroalpine Wetlands of the Bale Mountains, Ethiopia: Distribution, Dynamics, and Conceptual Flow Model," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 109(3), pages 791-811, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wenhui Bao & Xingyu Zeng & Chunyu Luo & Hongqiang Zhang & Yi Qu & Nan Xu, 2022. "The Relationship between Hydrological Connectivity Changes Inside and Outside Biodiversity Hotspots and Its Implication for Sustainable Environmental Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-14, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:80-:d:1016159. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.