Author
Listed:
- Mingyu Shao
(Institute of Karst Geology, CAGS/Key Laboratory of Karst Ecosystem and Rocky Desertification, Ministry of Natural Resources, Guilin 541004, China
Ministry of Natural Resources, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Karst Dynamics, Guilin 541004, China)
- Muhammad Adnan
(State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guiyang 550081, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
- Liankai Zhang
(Kunming Comprehensive Survey Center of Natural Resources, China Geological Survey, Kunming 650111, China
Technology Innovation Center for Natural Ecosystem Carbon Sink, Ministry of Natural Resources, Kunming 650111, China)
- Pengyu Liu
(Institute of Karst Geology, CAGS/Key Laboratory of Karst Ecosystem and Rocky Desertification, Ministry of Natural Resources, Guilin 541004, China
Ministry of Natural Resources, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Karst Dynamics, Guilin 541004, China)
- Jianhua Cao
(Institute of Karst Geology, CAGS/Key Laboratory of Karst Ecosystem and Rocky Desertification, Ministry of Natural Resources, Guilin 541004, China
Ministry of Natural Resources, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Karst Dynamics, Guilin 541004, China)
- Xiaoqun Qin
(Institute of Karst Geology, CAGS/Key Laboratory of Karst Ecosystem and Rocky Desertification, Ministry of Natural Resources, Guilin 541004, China
Ministry of Natural Resources, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Karst Dynamics, Guilin 541004, China)
Abstract
The relationship between the source and sink of atmospheric CO 2 has always been a widely discussed issue in global climate change research. Recent studies revealed that the chemical weathering of carbonate rocks contributed to 1/3 (~0.5 Pg C/yr) of the missing carbon sinks (MCS) globally, and there are still 2/3 of MCS (~0.5 Pg C/yr) that need to be explored. As one of the main overburdened parts of the earth, loess is one of the important driving factors for atmospheric CO 2 consumption. Here, we elaborated on the dissolution process and the carbon sink effect from carbonate and silicate minerals in loess. The relationship between carbonate dissolution and carbon source/sink is elucidated, and the mechanism of carbon sink formation from secondary carbonates in loess is clarified. Additionally, the commonly used methods for the identification of primary and secondary carbonates are summarized, and the methods for the study of loess carbon sinks and the influencing factors of loess carbon sinks are also revealed. Based on the research results and progress interpretations, the prospects of loess carbon sinks are discussed to provide a scientific basis for further research on loess carbon sinks.
Suggested Citation
Mingyu Shao & Muhammad Adnan & Liankai Zhang & Pengyu Liu & Jianhua Cao & Xiaoqun Qin, 2022.
"Carbonate Mineral Dissolution and Its Carbon Sink Effect in Chinese Loess,"
Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:133-:d:1021601
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- David W. Schindler, 1999.
"The mysterious missing sink,"
Nature, Nature, vol. 398(6723), pages 105-107, March.
- Gaohuan Liu & Zhonghe Zhao, 2018.
"Analysis of Carbon Storage and Its Contributing Factors—A Case Study in the Loess Plateau (China),"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, June.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
- Mahdis Sadat & Mahmood Zoghi & Bahram Malekmohammadi, 2020.
"Spatiotemporal modeling of urban land cover changes and carbon storage ecosystem services: case study in Qaem Shahr County, Iran,"
Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(8), pages 8135-8158, December.
- Felipe Macías & Marta Camps Arbestain, 2010.
"Soil carbon sequestration in a changing global environment,"
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 15(6), pages 511-529, August.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:133-:d:1021601. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.