IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i9p1591-d916688.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Urban Land Expansion Efficiency on Ecosystem Services: A Case Study of the Three Major Urban Agglomerations along the Yangtze River Economic Belt

Author

Listed:
  • Kun Wang

    (School of Geography Science, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410006, China)

  • Xiao Ouyang

    (School of Engineering Management, Hunan University of Finance and Economics, Changsha 410006, China)

  • Qingyun He

    (School of Geography Science, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410006, China)

  • Xiang Zhu

    (School of Geography Science, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410006, China)

Abstract

The negative impacts of urban land expansion on ecosystem services have been confirmed by many studies; however, there has been a lack of studies examining the impacts of urban expansion on ecosystems from an efficiency perspective. China is increasingly emphasising the efficiency of development systems by maximising economic, social, and environmental benefits from limited land resources, which is a vital issue for high-quality urban development. Therefore, this paper aims to explore the evolutionary characteristics of urban land expansion efficiency (ULEE) and its impact on ecosystem services (ESs) to improve the ecological functions of urban systems. We first analysed the influence mechanism, based on efficiency and land use theory. Then, we used the Super-SBM and the InVEST model to measure ULEE and ecosystem service value (ESV). Finally, through regression analysis we explored the actual characteristics of the influence of ULEE on ESs. The results show: (1) ULEE positively influences ESs, and the influence mediators include three main aspects, i.e., land use structure, land use pattern, and land use quality. (2) The ULEE of the urban agglomerations exhibited a fluctuating downward trend from 2006–2020, and noticeable spatial differences were observed. (3) The AESV of the three major urban agglomerations showed a decreasing trend during the study period, with the UA-MRYR being higher than UA-YRD and UA-CY. Meanwhile, a certain degree of coincidence between the changing trend of AESV and ULEE was apparent. (4) A positive correlation was found between ULEE and the ESV of the three urban agglomerations. That is, the enhancement of ULEE was found to catalyse the improvement of ESs. The impact of ULEE on ESs exhibited a general decreasing trend from east to west. These results complement the study of the territorial system of the human–land relationship and have essential reference value for sustainable urban development and ecological restoration.

Suggested Citation

  • Kun Wang & Xiao Ouyang & Qingyun He & Xiang Zhu, 2022. "Impact of Urban Land Expansion Efficiency on Ecosystem Services: A Case Study of the Three Major Urban Agglomerations along the Yangtze River Economic Belt," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:9:p:1591-:d:916688
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/9/1591/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/9/1591/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xie, Hualin & Chen, Qianru & Lu, Fucai & Wu, Qing & Wang, Wei, 2018. "Spatial-temporal disparities, saving potential and influential factors of industrial land use efficiency: A case study in urban agglomeration in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 518-529.
    2. He, Sanwei & Yu, Shan & Li, Guangdong & Zhang, Junfeng, 2020. "Exploring the influence of urban form on land-use efficiency from a spatiotemporal heterogeneity perspective: Evidence from 336 Chinese cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    3. Ruihao Cui & Jiazheng Han & Zhenqi Hu, 2022. "Assessment of Spatial Temporal Changes of Ecological Environment Quality: A Case Study in Huaibei City, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-19, June.
    4. Ouyang, Xiao & Tang, Lisha & Wei, Xiao & Li, Yonghui, 2021. "Spatial interaction between urbanization and ecosystem services in Chinese urban agglomerations," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    5. Tone, Kaoru, 2002. "A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 32-41, November.
    6. Wang, Saige & Chen, Bin, 2016. "Energy–water nexus of urban agglomeration based on multiregional input–output tables and ecological network analysis: A case study of the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 773-783.
    7. Guangdong Li & Chuanglin Fang & Yingjie Li & Zhenbo Wang & Siao Sun & Sanwei He & Wei Qi & Chao Bao & Haitao Ma & Yupeng Fan & Yuxue Feng & Xiaoping Liu, 2022. "Global impacts of future urban expansion on terrestrial vertebrate diversity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    8. Yu, Junqing & Zhou, Kaile & Yang, Shanlin, 2019. "Land use efficiency and influencing factors of urban agglomerations in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    9. Mengchao Yao & Yihua Zhang, 2021. "Evaluation and Optimization of Urban Land-Use Efficiency: A Case Study in Sichuan Province of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, February.
    10. Lin Chu & Tiancheng Sun & Tianwei Wang & Zhaoxia Li & Chongfa Cai, 2018. "Evolution and Prediction of Landscape Pattern and Habitat Quality Based on CA-Markov and InVEST Model in Hubei Section of Three Gorges Reservoir Area (TGRA)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-28, October.
    11. Xinqing Wang & Tao Pan & Ruoyi Pan & Wenfeng Chi & Chen Ma & Letian Ning & Xiaoyu Wang & Jiacheng Zhang, 2022. "Impact of Land Transition on Landscape and Ecosystem Service Value in Northeast Region of China from 2000–2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, May.
    12. Tone, Kaoru, 2001. "A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(3), pages 498-509, May.
    13. Han Chen & Chunyu Meng & Qilin Cao, 2022. "Measurement and Influencing Factors of Low Carbon Urban Land Use Efficiency—Based on Non-Radial Directional Distance Function," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohammadyari, Fatemeh & Tavakoli, Mohsen & Zarandian, Ardavan & Abdollahi, Sedighe, 2023. "Optimization land use based on multi-scenario simulation of ecosystem service for sustainable landscape planning in a mixed urban - Forest watershed," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 483(C).
    2. Wusheng Zhao & Peiji Shi & Ya Wan & Yan Yao, 2023. "Coupling and Coordination Relationship between Urbanization Quality and Ecosystem Services in the Upper Yellow River: A Case Study of the Lanzhou–Xining Urban Agglomeration, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yue Zhou & Yi Chen & Yi Hu, 2021. "Assessing Efficiency of Urban Land Utilisation under Environmental Constraints in Yangtze River Delta, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Mengchao Yao & Yihua Zhang, 2021. "Evaluation and Optimization of Urban Land-Use Efficiency: A Case Study in Sichuan Province of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, February.
    3. Yahong Liu & Hailian Sun & Lei Shi & Huimin Wang & Zhai Xiu & Xiao Qiu & Hong Chang & Yu Xie & Yang Wang & Chengjie Wang, 2021. "Spatial-Temporal Changes and Driving Factors of Land-Use Eco-Efficiency Incorporating Ecosystem Services in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, January.
    4. Lisha Pan & Hangang Hu & Xin Jing & Yang Chen & Guan Li & Zhongguo Xu & Yuefei Zhuo & Xueqi Wang, 2022. "The Impacts of Regional Cooperation on Urban Land-Use Efficiency: Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, June.
    5. Hao Su & Shuo Yang, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Urban Land Green Use Efficiency under Carbon Emission Constraints in the Yellow River Basin, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-28, October.
    6. Yanxi Lei & Zuoji Dong & Jichang Dong & Zhi Dong, 2023. "Multidimensional Evaluation of Urban Land-Use Efficiency and Innovation Capability Analysis: A Case Study in the Pearl River Delta Region, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, April.
    7. Xinhai Lu & Yifeng Tang & Shangan Ke, 2021. "Does the Construction and Operation of High-Speed Rail Improve Urban Land Use Efficiency? Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, March.
    8. Rongtian Zhang & Jianfei Lu, 2022. "Spatial–Temporal Pattern and Convergence Characteristics of Provincial Urban Land Use Efficiency under Environmental Constraints in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-15, August.
    9. Chengzhen Song & Qingfang Liu & Jinping Song & Zhengyun Jiang & Zhilin Lu & Yueying Chen, 2022. "Land Use Efficiency in the Yellow River Basin in the Background of China’s Economic Transformation: Spatial-Temporal Characteristics and Influencing Factors," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-22, December.
    10. Yayuan Pang & Xinjun Wang, 2020. "Land-Use Efficiency in Shandong (China): Empirical Analysis Based on a Super-SBM Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-20, December.
    11. Shuai Wang & Cunyi Yang & Zhenghui Li, 2021. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution Characteristics and Spatial Interaction Spillover Effects of New-Urbanization and Green Land Utilization Efficiency," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-26, October.
    12. Xue, Dan & Yue, Li & Ahmad, Fayyaz & Draz, Muhammad Umar & Chandio, Abbas Ali & Ahmad, Munir & Amin, Waqas, 2022. "Empirical investigation of urban land use efficiency and influencing factors of the Yellow River basin Chinese cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    13. Zhongxun Zhang & Kaifang Shi & Zhiyong Zhu & Lu Tang & Kangchuan Su & Qingyuan Yang, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of the Rural Natural Capital Utilization Efficiency: A Case Study of Chongqing, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-29, May.
    14. Xianxian Fan & Xin Jiang, 2024. "Regional differences and convergence of urban land green use efficiency in China under the constraints of carbon neutrality," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(9), pages 23499-23525, September.
    15. Yuan Feng & Ying Li & Changfei Nie, 2023. "The Effect of Place-Based Policy on Urban Land Green Use Efficiency: Evidence from the Pilot Free-Trade Zone Establishment in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, March.
    16. Jie Zhang & Yajing Wang & Jiangfeng Li, 2023. "Maximize Eco-Economic Benefits with Minimum Land Resources Input: Evaluation and Evolution of Land Use Eco-Efficiency of Agglomerations in Middle Reaches of Yangtze River, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-19, January.
    17. Aiping Wang & Weifen Lin & Bei Liu & Hui Wang & Hong Xu, 2021. "Does Smart City Construction Improve the Green Utilization Efficiency of Urban Land?," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-18, June.
    18. Lu, Xinhai & Chen, Danling & Kuang, Bing & Zhang, Chaozheng & Cheng, Chen, 2020. "Is high-tech zone a policy trap or a growth drive? Insights from the perspective of urban land use efficiency," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    19. Xiao Han & Anlu Zhang & Yinying Cai, 2020. "Spatio-Econometric Analysis of Urban Land Use Efficiency in China from the Perspective of Natural Resources Input and Undesirable Outputs: A Case Study of 287 Cities in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-21, October.
    20. Carlucci, Fabio & Corcione, Carlo & Mazzocchi, Paolo & Trincone, Barbara, 2021. "The role of logistics in promoting Italian agribusiness: The Belt and Road Initiative case study," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:9:p:1591-:d:916688. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.