IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i9p1386-d896011.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cultivated Land-Use Benefit Evaluation and Obstacle Factor Identification: Empirical Evidence from Northern Hubei, China

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Zhu

    (School of Economics and Management, Hubei University of Automotive Technology, Shiyan 442002, China)

  • Xuetao Li

    (School of Economics and Management, Hubei University of Automotive Technology, Shiyan 442002, China)

  • Xiaochun Zeng

    (School of Economics and Management, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710000, China)

  • Kaiyang Zhong

    (School of Economic Information Engineering, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 610074, China)

  • Yifan Xu

    (School of Accounting, Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Bengbu 233041, China)

Abstract

The benefit of cultivated land use is an essential indicator for measuring the optimal allocation of cultivated land resources and the high-quality development of agriculture. Taking Shiyan City, Xiangyang City, and Suizhou City in Northern Hubei as the research objects, this paper presents an evaluation index system for cultivated land use efficiency from the perspectives of ecology, economy, and society. The entropy TOPSIS method and the obstacle degree model were applied to estimate the cultivated land use efficiency and identify obstacle factors in the three study areas from 2010 to 2020, and the results were as follows. (1) The comprehensive benefit level of cultivated land utilization in Northern Hubei showed an upward trend, and the individual benefit levels of cultivated land utilization in different cities were significantly different. Xiangyang City had outstanding economic performance, Shiyan City had the fastest growth rate of ecological benefits, and various benefits of Suizhou City were “steady”. (2) The fluctuation ranges of the obstacle factors for cultivated land use were relatively large in the Northern Hubei region. From 2010 to 2016, the effective irrigation index, land-averaged fertilizer input level, agricultural input–output ratio, and per capita income of farmers were the main factors restricting the improvement of cultivated land utilization efficiency in Northern Hubei. During 2017–2020, the per capita pesticide input level, per capita grain output, forest coverage rate, land output rate, and agricultural mechanization efficiency became the main obstacles restricting the improvement of cultivated land-use efficiency. (3) All cities of Northern Hubei should take measures according to local conditions, implement specific policies to address the restrictive factors of cultivated land use, improve the level of cultivated land-use benefit in the region, and promote the coordination and unity of the economic, ecological, and social benefits of cultivated land use.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Zhu & Xuetao Li & Xiaochun Zeng & Kaiyang Zhong & Yifan Xu, 2022. "Cultivated Land-Use Benefit Evaluation and Obstacle Factor Identification: Empirical Evidence from Northern Hubei, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-19, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:9:p:1386-:d:896011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/9/1386/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/9/1386/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cao, Rui-fen & Zhang, An-lu & Cai, Yin-ying & Xie, Xiang-xiang, 2020. "How imbalanced land development affects local fiscal condition? A case study of Hubei Province, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    2. Liu, Er-na & Wang, Yanan & Chen, Wei & Chen, Wenjun & Ning, Siyin, 2021. "Evaluating the transformation of China's resource-based cities: An integrated sequential weight and TOPSIS approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    3. Xie, Xiang-xiang & Zhang, An-lu & Cai, Yin-ying & Zhang, Yu, 2020. "How government-led land consolidation efforts achieve grain production stability? An empirical analysis in Hubei Province, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiuyu Huang & Ying Wang & Wanyi Liang & Zhaojun Wang & Xiao Zhou & Qinqiang Yan, 2023. "Spatial–Temporal Evolution and Driving Factors of the Low–Carbon Transition of Farmland Use in Coastal Areas of Guangdong Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-23, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yin, Qiqi & Sui, Xueyan & Ye, Bei & Zhou, Yujie & Li, Chengqiang & Zou, Mengmeng & Zhou, Shenglu, 2022. "What role does land consolidation play in the multi-dimensional rural revitalization in China? A research synthesis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    2. Yiming Wei & Hongwei Wang & Bo Tan & Mengqi Xue & Yucong Yin, 2022. "Analysis of the Spatial Differentiation and Development Optimization of Towns’ Livable Quality in Aksu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-16, June.
    3. Song, Min & Yi, Luping & Hu, Can, 2023. "Building up a compensation-oriented transferable development right mechanism: A theoretical and empirical exploration in Hubei, China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    4. Wang, Ge & Li, Xiaoqiu & Gao, Yingjie & Zeng, Chen & Wang, Bingkun & Li, Xiangyu & Li, Xintong, 2023. "How does land consolidation drive rural industrial development? Qualitative and quantitative analysis of 32 land consolidation cases in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    5. Chuansong Zhao & Ran Geng & Jianxu Liu & Liuying Peng & Woraphon Yamaka, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Evolution and Driving Factors of Land Development: Evidence from Shandong Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-21, October.
    6. Lingli Li & Jinjie Wang & Chaoxian Yang & Chaofu Wei, 2021. "Implementation Process of General Land-Use Planning and Its Adjustment—A Case Study of Rongchang District in Chongqing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-24, May.
    7. Yiting Su & Jing Li & Shouqiang Yin & Jiabao Yue & Zhai Jiang & Tianyue Ma & Zhangqian Han, 2023. "Spatial and Temporal Variation Characteristics and Driving Mechanisms of Multidimensional Socio-Economic Development Levels in Resource-Based Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, January.
    8. Siyu Han & Mengcheng Wang & Qi Liu & Renyang Wang & Guoliang Ou & Lu Zhang, 2022. "The Influence of Land Disposition Derived from Land Finance on Urban Innovation in China: Mechanism Discussion and Empirical Evidence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-23, March.
    9. Lei, Weiqian & Jiao, Limin & Xu, Gang, 2022. "Understanding the urban scaling of urban land with an internal structure view to characterize China’s urbanization," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    10. Baopeng Xie & Quanxi Wang & Beiying Huang & Ying Chen & Jie Yang & Peixin Qi, 2022. "Coordinated State Analysis and Differential Regulation of Territorial Spatial Functions in Underdeveloped Regions: A Case Study of Gansu Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-20, January.
    11. Xu, Fei & Li, Qiangyi & Yang, Mian, 2022. "The impacts of high-speed rail on the transformation of resource-based cities in China: A market segmentation perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    12. Siliang Guo & Yanhua Diao & Junliang Du, 2022. "Coupling Coordination Measurement and Evaluation of Urban Digitalization and Green Development in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-32, November.
    13. Sun, Yongping & Li, Yingyi & Yu, Tiantian & Zhang, Xinyu & Liu, Lingna & Zhang, Ping, 2021. "Resource extraction, environmental pollution and economic development: Evidence from prefecture-level cities in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    14. Xia Tian & Yinying Cai & Qing Yang & Jin Xie, 2023. "How Do Heterogeneous Land Development Opportunities Affect Rural Household Nonfarm Employment: A Perspective of Spatial Regulation," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-16, April.
    15. Jia Gao & Rongrong Zhao & Ge Song & Yuxin Zhan & Yaohui Zhu, 2022. "Spatial–Temporal Evolution Patterns and Regulatory Strategies for Land Resource Carrying Capacity of China’s Major Grain-Producing Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-17, November.
    16. Jing Cheng & Xiaowei Luo, 2022. "Analyzing the Land Leasing Behavior of the Government of Beijing, China, via the Multinomial Logit Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-14, March.
    17. Zhaohan Lu & Yuping Wu & Shiwei An & Yun Zhang & Jiahao Zhu, 2022. "The Measurement and Spatiotemporal Evolution Analysis of an Ecological Niche for the High-Quality Development of Resource-Based Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-27, October.
    18. Yan Sun & Xiaojun Song & Jing Ma & Haochen Yu & Xiaoping Ge & Gang-Jun Liu & Fu Chen, 2021. "Assessing the Effectiveness for Achieving Policy Objectives of Land Consolidation in China: Evidence from Project Practices in Jiangsu Province from 2001 to 2017," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-20, December.
    19. Wei Li & Baichuan Xiang & Rongxia Zhang & Guomin Li & Zhihao Wang & Bin Su & Tossou Mahugbe Eric, 2022. "Impact of Resource-Based Economic Transformation Policy on Sulfur Dioxide Emissions: A Case Study of Shanxi Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-22, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:9:p:1386-:d:896011. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.