IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i8p1250-d881276.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of Flight Height and Image Sensor on the Quality of the UAS Orthophotos for Cadastral Survey Purposes

Author

Listed:
  • Hrvoje Sertić

    (Geo-Land d.o.o., Antuna Mihanovića 14, 10450 Jastrebarsko, Croatia)

  • Rinaldo Paar

    (Department of Applied Geodesy, Faculty of Geodesy, University of Zagreb, Kačićeva 26, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Hrvoje Tomić

    (Department of Applied Geodesy, Faculty of Geodesy, University of Zagreb, Kačićeva 26, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Fabijan Ravlić

    (Dibit Messtechnik GmbH, Framsweg 16, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria)

Abstract

The possibility of using unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for cadastral survey purposes was investigated in this research. A study site consisting of 26 ground control points (GCP) and checkpoints (CP) was established. The study site was first measured by the classical methods of geodetic surveying, i.e., by the polar method using a total station. After that, all points were additionally measured by the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Real-Time Kinematic (RTK) method. The GNSS RTK method was used to determine the coordinates of all points in the official map projection of Croatia, HTRS96/TM, while the polar method was used to increase the positional “strength” of points in all directions, i.e., to improve the relative accuracy between them. Using UASs with different image sensor characteristics, the study site was measured by an aerial photogrammetry method at different flight heights with the purpose of obtaining a high-quality digital orthophoto plan (DOF). The absolute orientation of the model was performed using the external orientation data of each digital image based on GNSS and Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) UAS’s sensors, as well as using GCPs. Achieved precision of obtained DOF, as well as accuracy analysis of aerial photogrammetry was performed by considering the adjusted survey data collected by classical and GNSS RTK methods as true values and comparing them with the coordinates obtained by the aerial photogrammetry method from DOFs. Based on the achieved results and conclusions obtained from the study site, the second field test was performed above a small settlement which served as an area for cadastral survey using the UAS and GNSS RTK method. Again, precision and accuracy were determined, based on which we derived recommendations and conclusions for using UASs for cadastral survey purposes.

Suggested Citation

  • Hrvoje Sertić & Rinaldo Paar & Hrvoje Tomić & Fabijan Ravlić, 2022. "Influence of Flight Height and Image Sensor on the Quality of the UAS Orthophotos for Cadastral Survey Purposes," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:8:p:1250-:d:881276
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/8/1250/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/8/1250/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sanda Marioara Naș & Mircea Vasile Bondrea & Virgil Mihai Rădulescu & Raluca Gâlgău & Ioel Samuel Vereș & Raluca Bondrea & Adrian Traian Rădulescu, 2023. "The Use of UAVs for Land Use Planning of Brownfield Regeneration Projects-Case Study: Former Brick Factory, Cluj Napoca, Romania," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-20, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:8:p:1250-:d:881276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.