IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i4p538-d788852.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

India’s Greening Trend Seems to Slow Down. What Does Aerosol Have to Do with It?

Author

Listed:
  • Manoj Hari

    (Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, National Institute of Technology Rourkela, Odisha 769008, India)

  • Bhishma Tyagi

    (Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, National Institute of Technology Rourkela, Odisha 769008, India)

Abstract

Multiple drivers perturb the terrestrial carbon cycle, which ultimately reshapes the fertilization of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) and reorientates the climate. One such driver is atmospheric aerosols, which cascade the ecosystem’s productivity in a large proportionality. Investigating this relation is non-conventional and limited across the globe. With the abundance of heterogenetic terrestrial ecosystems, India’s primary productivity has a large proportion of the global carbon balance. Under climate change stress, India’s unique spatial and climatological features perturb atmospheric aerosols from natural sources to anthropogenic sources. In light of that, this study utilizes the Carnegie–Ames Stanford Approach (CASA) model to elucidate the consequence by examining the potential effect of aerosol load on the ecosystem productivity (Net Primary Production; NPP) for various agroclimatic zones of India from 2001–2020. CASA reveals a negative decadal amplitude with an overall increase in the NPP trend. In contrast, aerosol loadings from MODIS highlight the increasing trend, with definite seasonal intensities. Employing the CASA model and earth observations, the study highlights the increase in NPP in forest-based ecosystems due to relatively lower aerosols and higher diffuse radiation. Critically, strong dampening of NPP was observed in the agroecological and sparse vegetation zones inferring that the aerosol loadings affect the primary productivity by affecting the photosynthesis of canopy architecture. Spatial sensitivity zones across different ecological regions result in a non-homogenous response because of different phenological and canopy architecture that is mediated by the radiation intensities. Based on the analysis, the study infers that AOD positively influences the canopy-scale photosynthesis by diffuse radiation, which promotes NPP but is less likely for the crop canopy ecosystems. Barring the limitations, enhancement of NPP in the forest ecosystems offset the demand for carbon sink in the agroecosystems. Findings from this study reveal that a more precise provenance of aerosol effects on carbon fluxes is required to understand the uncertainties in the terrestrial carbon cycle.

Suggested Citation

  • Manoj Hari & Bhishma Tyagi, 2022. "India’s Greening Trend Seems to Slow Down. What Does Aerosol Have to Do with It?," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:4:p:538-:d:788852
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/4/538/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/4/538/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yu, Rui, 2020. "An improved estimation of net primary productivity of grassland in the Qinghai-Tibet region using light use efficiency with vegetation photosynthesis model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 431(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dandan Zhao & Wenyue Jia & Jiping Liu, 2023. "Dynamic Changes and Driving Mechanisms of Net Primary Production (NPP) in a Semi-Arid Region of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-12, August.
    2. Argenti, G. & Chiesi, M. & Fibbi, L. & Maselli, F., 2022. "Use of remote sensing and bio-geochemical models to estimate the net carbon fluxes of managed mountain grasslands," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 474(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:4:p:538-:d:788852. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.