IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i3p403-d767650.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research into Satisfaction with Industrial Heritage Renewal Based on the SEM-IPA Model: A Case Study of the Dongguan Jianyuzhou Park

Author

Listed:
  • Wenwei Huang

    (School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
    State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building Science, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China)

  • Gui Xiong

    (School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China)

  • Lei Zhong

    (School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China)

  • Keqing Li

    (School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China)

  • Hongyang Li

    (School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
    State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building Science, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
    Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Martin Skitmore

    (Faculty of Society and Design, Bond University, 14 University Drive, Robina, QLD 4226, Australia)

  • Nima Talebian

    (Faculty of Society and Design, Bond University, 14 University Drive, Robina, QLD 4226, Australia)

Abstract

The objective of this study was to establish a satisfaction evaluation model of industrial heritage renewal by evaluating the performance of old industrial buildings after renewal, then judging the adaptability and accuracy of the transformation strategy and putting forward targeted improvement suggestions. The data were collected through a questionnaire survey and analyzed by the statistical package for social science (SPSS) software using a structural equation model (SEM) and importance–performance analysis (IPA). The results show that (1) history, culture, and placeness have the largest average satisfaction and a positive and significant impact on overall satisfaction; (2) the building regeneration effect has a significant impact on overall satisfaction; and (3) social influence, external environmental perception, and economic benefits have no significant effect on overall satisfaction, indicating the need to strengthen public participation for further research into environmental creation, market-based operation, and land conservation. This case study reflects the distinctive features of internationalization and localization, and provides an indication of local practice in China for world urban renewal and architectural heritage theories.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenwei Huang & Gui Xiong & Lei Zhong & Keqing Li & Hongyang Li & Martin Skitmore & Nima Talebian, 2022. "Research into Satisfaction with Industrial Heritage Renewal Based on the SEM-IPA Model: A Case Study of the Dongguan Jianyuzhou Park," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-20, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:3:p:403-:d:767650
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/3/403/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/3/403/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marta Bottero & Chiara D’Alpaos & Alessandra Oppio, 2019. "Ranking of Adaptive Reuse Strategies for Abandoned Industrial Heritage in Vulnerable Contexts: A Multiple Criteria Decision Aiding Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Juncheng Dai & Xue Huang & Huasheng Zhu, 2015. "Interpretation of 798: Changes in Power of Representation and Sustainability of Industrial Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-22, April.
    3. Marko Nikolić & Boško Drobnjak & Irena Kuletin Ćulafić, 2020. "The Possibilities of Preservation, Regeneration and Presentation of Industrial Heritage: The Case of Old Mint “A.D.” on Belgrade Riverfront," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-36, June.
    4. Xiaolu Wu & Li Yu & Haosen Fang & Jing Wu, 2021. "Research on the Protection and Reuse of Industrial Heritage from the Perspective of Public Participation—A Case Study of Northern Mining Area of Pingdingshan, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-30, December.
    5. Kinga Kimic & Carlos Smaniotto Costa & Mihaela Negulescu, 2021. "Creating Tourism Destinations of Underground Built Heritage—The Cases of Salt Mines in Poland, Portugal, and Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-23, August.
    6. Nadia Pintossi & Deniz Ikiz Kaya & Ana Pereira Roders, 2021. "Identifying Challenges and Solutions in Cultural Heritage Adaptive Reuse through the Historic Urban Landscape Approach in Amsterdam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-25, May.
    7. Andreea Ionica & Ionela Samuil & Monica Leba & Mihaela Toderas, 2020. "The Path of Petrila Mining Area towards Future Industrial Heritage Tourism Seen through the Lenses of Past and Present," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-32, November.
    8. Qing Yuan & HakJun Song & Nan Chen & Wenwen Shang, 2019. "Roles of Tourism Involvement and Place Attachment in Determining Residents’ Attitudes Toward Industrial Heritage Tourism in a Resource-Exhausted City in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-23, September.
    9. Francesca Nocca, 2017. "The Role of Cultural Heritage in Sustainable Development: Multidimensional Indicators as Decision-Making Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-28, October.
    10. Heike Oevermann & Harald A. Mieg, 2021. "Urban Development Planning and World Cultural Heritage: Two Perspectives of Planning Practice Dealing with Industrial Heritage," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 430-441, August.
    11. Naveed Ahmad & Yuming Zhu & Muhammad Ibrahim & Muhammad Waqas & Abdul Waheed, 2018. "Development of a Standard Brownfield Definition, Guidelines, and Evaluation Index System for Brownfield Redevelopment in Developing Countries: The Case of Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, November.
    12. Zhou, Yulin & Lan, Feng & Zhou, Tao, 2021. "An experience-based mining approach to supporting urban renewal mode decisions under a multi-stakeholder environment in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nian Li & Ya Wen & Yanxin Wang & Yifei Li & Qibing Chen & Xi Li & Bingyang Lv, 2022. "Does Soundscape Perception Lead to Environmentally Responsible Behavior? A Case Study in Longcanggou Forest Park, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-15, September.
    2. NaHyun Lee & Bong-Seok Kim, 2023. "Differences of Host Country-Destination Image Assessment for International Students According to Risk Perception in COVID-19 Tourism," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, July.
    3. Jiahui Ai & Myun Kim, 2024. "Spatial Remodeling of Industrial Heritage from the Perspective of Urban Renewal: A Case Study of Coal Mine Site in Jiaozuo City," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mi Yan & Qingmiao Li & Jiazhen Zhang, 2023. "Rethinking Industrial Heritage Tourism Resources in the EU: A Spatial Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-32, July.
    2. Francesca Nocca & Martina Bosone & Manuel Orabona, 2024. "Multicriteria Evaluation Framework for Industrial Heritage Adaptive Reuse: The Role of the ‘Intrinsic Value’," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-26, August.
    3. Carlos Smaniotto Costa & Marluci Menezes & Petja Ivanova-Radovanova & Tatiana Ruchinskaya & Konstantinos Lalenis & Monica Bocci, 2021. "Planning Perspectives and Approaches for Activating Underground Built Heritage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-15, September.
    4. Sunny Han Han & Huimin Zhang, 2022. "Progress and Prospects in Industrial Heritage Reconstruction and Reuse Research during the Past Five Years: Review and Outlook," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, November.
    5. Carlos J. Pardo Abad, 2020. "Valuation of Industrial Heritage in Terms of Sustainability: Some Cases of Tourist Reference in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-23, November.
    6. Fang He & Wendong Wu & Taozhi Zhuang & Yuan Yi, 2019. "Exploring the Diverse Expectations of Stakeholders in Industrial Land Redevelopment Projects in China: The Case of Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-27, August.
    7. Zhengyuan Zhao & Zhigao Liu, 2021. "Development Path of Industrial Heritage Tourism: A Case Study of Kitakyushu (Japan)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, November.
    8. Marko Nikolić & Boško Drobnjak & Irena Kuletin Ćulafić, 2020. "The Possibilities of Preservation, Regeneration and Presentation of Industrial Heritage: The Case of Old Mint “A.D.” on Belgrade Riverfront," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-36, June.
    9. Chenqi Han & Yimin Song & Yang Zhao, 2024. "An Evaluation Study on Tourists’ Environmental Satisfaction after Re-Use of Industrial Heritage Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-28, April.
    10. Juan Claver & Amabel García-Domínguez & Miguel A. Sebastián, 2021. "Collaborative Cataloging of Spanish Industrial Heritage Assets through Teaching in Project Management Subjects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-22, September.
    11. Alessio D’Auria & Pasquale De Toro & Nicola Fierro & Elisa Montone, 2018. "Integration between GIS and Multi-Criteria Analysis for Ecosystem Services Assessment: A Methodological Proposal for the National Park of Cilento, Vallo di Diano and Alburni (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-25, September.
    12. Mateusz Naramski & Adam R. Szromek, 2019. "Configuring a Trust-based Inter-organizational Cooperation Network for Post-industrial Tourist Organizations on a Tourist Route," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-20, June.
    13. Nadia Pintossi & Deniz Ikiz Kaya & Ana Pereira Roders, 2021. "Assessing Cultural Heritage Adaptive Reuse Practices: Multi-Scale Challenges and Solutions in Rijeka," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, March.
    14. Hanan S.S. Ibrahim & Ahmed Z. Khan & Shady Attia & Yehya Serag, 2021. "Classification of Heritage Residential Building Stock and Defining Sustainable Retrofitting Scenarios in Khedivial Cairo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-26, January.
    15. Joris Van Doorsselaere, 2021. "Connecting Sustainable Development and Heritage Education? An Analysis of the Curriculum Reform in Flemish Public Secondary Schools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    16. Jinkun Yang & Linchuan Yang & Haitao Ma, 2022. "Community Participation Strategy for Sustainable Urban Regeneration in Xiamen, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-14, April.
    17. Lisa Dang & Jan Weiss, 2021. "Evidence on the Relationship between Place Attachment and Behavioral Intentions between 2010 and 2021: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-19, November.
    18. Huihui Gao & Shangyi Zhou, 2021. "Oriental Marco Polo Plaza Encounter: Choreographing Place and Placelessness from a Phenomenological Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-17, May.
    19. Miyu Komaki & Haruka Kato & Daisuke Matsushita, 2023. "Why Did Urban Exodus Occur during the COVID-19 Pandemic from the Perspective of Residential Preference of Each Type of Household? Case of Japanese Metropolitan Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    20. Lea Rebernik & Barbara Vojvodíková & Barbara Lampič, 2023. "Brownfield Data and Database Management—The Key to Address Land Recycling," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:3:p:403-:d:767650. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.