IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i1p83-d718796.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ecosystem Services from Ecological Agroforestry in Brazil: A Systematic Map of Scientific Evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Hanna R. Schuler

    (Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Pós Graduação em Agroecossistemas, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis 88034-000, SC, Brazil)

  • Gisele G. Alarcon

    (Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Pós Graduação em Agroecossistemas, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis 88034-000, SC, Brazil)

  • Fernando Joner

    (Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Pós Graduação em Agroecossistemas, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis 88034-000, SC, Brazil)

  • Karine Louise dos Santos

    (Centro de Ciências Rurais, Pós Graduação em Ecossistemas Agrícolas e Naturais, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Curitibanos 89520-000, SC, Brazil)

  • Alexandre Siminski

    (Centro de Ciências Rurais, Pós Graduação em Ecossistemas Agrícolas e Naturais, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Curitibanos 89520-000, SC, Brazil)

  • Ilyas Siddique

    (Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Pós Graduação em Agroecossistemas, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis 88034-000, SC, Brazil)

Abstract

(1) Brazil has great potential to expand the area under agroforestry, and thereby simultaneously enhance multiple ecosystem services. However, divergent interests are currently polarized between drastic environmental deregulation and public resource allocation to chemical-intensive land use versus conservation and sustainable agriculture. This highlights an urgent need for a comprehensive overview of the evidence of the benefits to society generated by agroforestry across Brazil. (2) We present a systematic map of the scientific evidence related to the effects of agroforestry on ecosystem services in Brazil. (3) Reviewing 158 peer-reviewed articles, published in international scientific journals (database: Web of Science), we identified a disproportionate emphasis on the Atlantic Forest. Very little research has been published on the Cerrado savanna, Pampa grasslands and Pantanal wetlands. Regulating services were much more frequently studied (85%) than provisioning (13%), while cultural services represent a major gap. A consistent positive effect of agroforestry was demonstrated for soil quality, habitat and food provisioning. Trade-offs were demonstrated for soils and habitats. (4) Our analysis identifies high-priority gaps given their critical importance for human well-being which should be filled: agroforestry effects on water provision and regulation. Moreover, they should assess other ES such as erosion control, flood protection and pest control to enable a more reliable inference about trade-offs.

Suggested Citation

  • Hanna R. Schuler & Gisele G. Alarcon & Fernando Joner & Karine Louise dos Santos & Alexandre Siminski & Ilyas Siddique, 2022. "Ecosystem Services from Ecological Agroforestry in Brazil: A Systematic Map of Scientific Evidence," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:1:p:83-:d:718796
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/1/83/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/1/83/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yang, Yiling & Xiong, Kangning & Xiao, Jie, 2024. "A review of agroforestry biodiversity-driven provision of ecosystem services and implications for karst desertification control," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:1:p:83-:d:718796. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.