IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i10p1611-d919423.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When Is a Park More Than a Park? Rethinking the Role of Parks as “Shared Space” in Post-Conflict Belfast

Author

Listed:
  • Ian Mell

    (Department of Planning & Environmental Management, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK)

  • John Sturzaker

    (Department of Psychology, Sport and Geography, University of Hertfordshire, Hartfield AL10 9AB, UK)

  • Alice Correia

    (Independent Researcher, Manchester M13 9PL, UK)

  • Mary Gearey

    (School of Applied Sciences, University of Brighton, Brighton BN2 4AT, UK)

  • Neale Blair

    (School of Architecture and Built Environment, University of Ulster, Belfast BT15 1ED, UK)

  • Luciana Lang

    (School of Arts, Language and Culture, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK)

  • Fearghus O’Sullivan

    (Department of Planning & Environmental Management, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK)

Abstract

With the signing of the Belfast Agreement, Belfast (Northern Ireland, UK) entered a new phase of urban development. Moving away from notions of division, Belfast City Council envisaged an inclusive and accessible city. Over a 20-year period, there have been significant changes in Belfast’s physical, socio-cultural, and political structure, reframing the city as a post-conflict space. However, there has been limited analysis of the role of parks in this process. This paper examines perceptions of parks, asking whether the promotion of a “shared spaces” policy aligns with local use. Through a mixed-methods approach, park users were surveyed to reflect on the meanings of parks in the city. We argue that although residual interpretations associated with historical socio-cultural divisions remain, parks are predominately multi-community amenities. The analysis illustrates that although destination parks attract greater patronage, there is visible clustering around ‘anchor’ sites at the local scale, especially in neighbourhoods with significant Catholic or Protestant identities.

Suggested Citation

  • Ian Mell & John Sturzaker & Alice Correia & Mary Gearey & Neale Blair & Luciana Lang & Fearghus O’Sullivan, 2022. "When Is a Park More Than a Park? Rethinking the Role of Parks as “Shared Space” in Post-Conflict Belfast," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-20, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:10:p:1611-:d:919423
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/10/1611/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/10/1611/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tim Cunningham, 2014. "Changing direction: Defensive planning in a post-conflict city," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4-5), pages 455-462, October.
    2. Jonny J. Huck & J. Duncan Whyatt & John Dixon & Brendan Sturgeon & Bree Hocking & Gemma Davies & Neil Jarman & Dominic Bryan, 2019. "Exploring Segregation and Sharing in Belfast: A PGIS Approach," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 109(1), pages 223-241, January.
    3. Anna Barker & Adam Crawford & Nathan Booth & David Churchill, 2020. "Park futures: Excavating images of tomorrow’s urban green spaces," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(12), pages 2456-2472, September.
    4. Gabriella Esposito De Vita & Claudia Trillo & Alona Martinez- Perez, 2016. "Community planning and urban design in contested places. Some insights from Belfast," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 320-334, June.
    5. Ian C. Mell, 2018. "Greening Ahmedabad—creating a resilient Indian city using a green infrastructure approach to investment," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(3), pages 289-314, April.
    6. Mike Morrissey & Frank Gaffikin, 2006. "Planning for Peace in Contested Space," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 873-893, December.
    7. Jonny Byrne & Cathy Gormley-Heenan, 2014. "Beyond the walls: Dismantling Belfast's conflict architecture," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4-5), pages 447-454, October.
    8. Nicola Dempsey & Smriti Rabina Jayaraj & Emily Redmond, 2018. "There’s always the river: social and environmental equity in rapidly urbanising landscapes in India," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(3), pages 275-288, April.
    9. Rosaleen Hickey, 2014. "The psychological dimensions of shared space in Belfast," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4-5), pages 440-446, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huriye Gürdallı & Sevil Bulanık, 2023. "Socio-Cultural Recovery of the Border in Nicosia: Buffer Fringe Festival over Its Boundaries," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nancy Ettlinger, 2009. "Surmounting City Silences: Knowledge Creation and the Design of Urban Democracy in the Everyday Economy," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 217-230, March.
    2. Joanne Murphy & Sara McDowell & Maire Braniff & David Denyer, 2018. "Managing contested spaces: Public managers, obscured mechanisms and the legacy of the past in Northern Ireland," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(3), pages 443-459, May.
    3. Renato Monteiro & José C. Ferreira & Paula Antunes, 2020. "Green Infrastructure Planning Principles: An Integrated Literature Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Ralf Brand, 2009. "Written and Unwritten Building Conventions in a Contested City: The Case of Belfast," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(12), pages 2669-2689, November.
    5. Maria Patrizia Vittoria & Stefania Ragozino & Gabriella Esposito De Vita, 2023. "Urban Commons between Ostrom’s and Neo-Materialist Approaches: The Case of Lido Pola in Naples, Southern Italy," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, February.
    6. Daniel Silver & Ultan Byrne & Patrick Adler, 2021. "Venues and segregation: A revised Schelling model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-35, January.
    7. Paul Reilly, 2012. "Community Worker Perspectives on the Use of New Media to Reconfigure Socio-spatial Relations in Belfast," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(15), pages 3385-3401, November.
    8. Changsong Oh & Jisoo Sim, 2022. "Effectiveness of Public Partnerships in Non-Urban Regeneration Projects in Korea: Seeing through Place-Keeping Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-27, April.
    9. Israel R. Orimoloye & Olusola O. Ololade, 2021. "Global trends assessment of environmental health degradation studies from 1990 to 2018," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 3251-3264, March.
    10. Rasmussen, Laura Vang & Fold, Niels & Olesen, Rasmus Skov & Shackleton, Sheona, 2021. "Socio-economic outcomes of ecological infrastructure investments," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    11. Joanne Murphy & Sara McDowell, 2023. "Making sense of segregation: Transitional thinking and contested space," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(14), pages 2835-2851, November.
    12. Sterrett, Ken & Hackett, Mark & Hill, Declan, 2012. "The social consequences of broken urban structures: a case study of Belfast," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 49-61.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:10:p:1611-:d:919423. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.