IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i7p679-d583456.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Analysis of Two Major Approaches for Mapping the Wildland-Urban Interface: A Case Study in California

Author

Listed:
  • Avi Bar-Massada

    (Department of Biology and Environment, University of Haifa—Oranim, Kiryat Tivon 36006, Israel)

Abstract

The Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) is where human settlements border or intermingle with undeveloped land, often with multiple detrimental consequences. Therefore, mapping the WUI is required in order to identify areas-at-risk. There are two main WUI mapping methods, the point-based approach and the zonal approach. Both differ in data requirements and may produce considerably different maps, yet they were never compared before. My objective was to systematically compare the point-based and the zonal-based WUI maps of California, and to test the efficacy of a new database of building locations in the context of WUI mapping. I assessed the spatial accuracy of the building database, and then compared the spatial patterns of WUI maps by estimating the effect of multiple ancillary variables on the amount of agreement between maps. I found that the building database is highly accurate and is suitable for WUI mapping. The point-based approach estimated a consistently larger WUI area across California compared to the zonal approach. The spatial correspondence between maps was low-to-moderate, and was significantly affected by building numbers and by their spatial arrangement. The discrepancy between WUI maps suggests that they are not directly comparable within and across landscapes, and that each WUI map should serve a distinct practical purpose.

Suggested Citation

  • Avi Bar-Massada, 2021. "A Comparative Analysis of Two Major Approaches for Mapping the Wildland-Urban Interface: A Case Study in California," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:7:p:679-:d:583456
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/7/679/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/7/679/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alavalapati, Janaki R.R. & Carter, Douglas R. & Newman, David H., 2005. "Wildland-urban interface: Challenges and opportunities," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(5), pages 705-708, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthew R. Auer, 2024. "Wildfire risk and insurance: research directions for policy scientists," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 57(2), pages 459-484, June.
    2. Ilona M. McNeill & Patrick D. Dunlop & Jonathan B. Heath & Timothy C. Skinner & David L. Morrison, 2013. "Expecting the Unexpected: Predicting Physiological and Psychological Wildfire Preparedness from Perceived Risk, Responsibility, and Obstacles," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(10), pages 1829-1843, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:7:p:679-:d:583456. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.