IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i6p579-d566142.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do ARMA Models Provide Better Gap Filling in Time Series of Soil Temperature and Soil Moisture? The Case of Arable Land in the Kulunda Steppe, Russia

Author

Listed:
  • Elena Ponkina

    (Department of Theoretical Cybernetics and Applied Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Information Technologies, Altai State University, 656049 Barnaul, Russia)

  • Patrick Illiger

    (Institute of Geosciences and Geography, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, 06108 Halle, Germany)

  • Olga Krotova

    (Department of Theoretical Cybernetics and Applied Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Information Technologies, Altai State University, 656049 Barnaul, Russia)

  • Andrey Bondarovich

    (Department of Theoretical Cybernetics and Applied Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Information Technologies, Altai State University, 656049 Barnaul, Russia)

Abstract

The adoption of climate-smart agriculture requires the comprehensive development of environmental monitoring tools, including online observation of climate and soil settings. They are often designed to measure soil properties automatically at different depths at hour or minute intervals. It is essential to have a complete dataset to use statistical models for the prediction of soil properties and to make short-term decisions regarding soil tillage operations and irrigation during a vegetation period. This is also important in applied hydrological studies. Nevertheless, the time series of soil hydrological measurements often have data gaps for different reasons. The study focused on solving a problem of gap-filling in hourly time series of soil temperature and moisture, measured at the 30 cm depth using a weighted gravitation lysimeter station while meteorological data were recorded simultaneously by a weather station. The equipment was installed in the Kulunda Steppe in the Altai Krai, Russia. Considering that climate conditions affect soil temperature and moisture content directly, we did a comparative analysis of the gap-filling performance using the three imputation methods—linear interpolation, multiple linear regression, and extended ARMA ( p , q ) models with exogenous climatic variables. The results showed that, according to the minimum of the mean absolute error, ARMA ( p , q ) models with optimally selected order parameters, and an adaptive window, had some advantages compared to other single-imputation methods. The ARMA ( p , q ) model produced a good quality of gap-filling in time series with the mean absolute error of 0.19 °C and 0.08 Vol. % for soil temperature and moisture content, respectively. The findings supplemented the methodology of hydrological data processing and the development of digital tools for the online monitoring of climate and soil properties in agriculture.

Suggested Citation

  • Elena Ponkina & Patrick Illiger & Olga Krotova & Andrey Bondarovich, 2021. "Do ARMA Models Provide Better Gap Filling in Time Series of Soil Temperature and Soil Moisture? The Case of Arable Land in the Kulunda Steppe, Russia," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:6:p:579-:d:566142
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/6/579/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/6/579/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zefu Gao & Qinyu Zhu & Haicheng Tao & Yiwen Jiao, 2023. "Grassland Health in Xilin Gol League from the Perspective of Machine Learning—Analysis of Grazing Intensity on Grassland Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-31, February.
    2. Martin Munashe Chari & Leocadia Zhou & Hamisai Hamandawana, 2023. "Linking Satellite, Land Capability, and Socio-Economic Data for Local-Level Climate-Change-Adaptive Capacity Assessments and Decision Support," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-21, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:6:p:579-:d:566142. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.