IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i3p256-d509539.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conflicting Maps: How Legal Perspectives Could Minimize Zoning Cancellation in Republic of Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Jung-kyun Moon

    (Legal Policy Research Institute, 1, Uisadang-daero, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul 07233, Korea)

  • Seon-bong Yoo

    (Division of Law and the Graduate School of Construction Legal Affairs, Kwangwoon University, 20 Kwangwoon-ro, Nowon-gu, Seoul 01897, Korea)

  • Hong-gyoo Sohn

    (School of Civil & Environmental Engineering, A463, Engineering Hall 1, Yonsei Univ. 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Korea)

  • Yonng-sun Cho

    (Hanmac Engineering, 301-ho Dream Plaza 2, 6-8 Sinseonghwaro 46 Beon-gil, Seowon-gu, Chungcheongbuk-do, Cheongju 28164, Korea)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to propose legal and policy enhancements that may prevent the cancellation of the legal force of zoning due to discord with the Korean Land Use Regulation Map (LURM) and secure legal stability. The legal force of zoning has been canceled because of the discordance of the LURM with past cadastral maps, and this has led to confusion regarding zoning decisions and even the postponement and cancellation of public projects. Here, the causes of LURM discordance and legal cancellation of zoning were identified and evaluated through judicial precedents. We found that improper use of data and adoption of tolerance caused the cancellations. To remedy these problems, we suggest the disclosure and application of cadastral computerized data instead of serial cadastral maps during LURM production activities to justify the legal adoption of allowable errors. We also recommend the widespread introduction of legal fiction for the rapid production of digital cadastral maps. Zoning cancellation could be minimized through such enhancements, and the map could allow people to visualize elements more conveniently. Moreover, this study aims to expand relevant legal mapping.

Suggested Citation

  • Jung-kyun Moon & Seon-bong Yoo & Hong-gyoo Sohn & Yonng-sun Cho, 2021. "Conflicting Maps: How Legal Perspectives Could Minimize Zoning Cancellation in Republic of Korea," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-21, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:3:p:256-:d:509539
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/3/256/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/3/256/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Walker, 2016. "Debate: Government’s right to know," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(6), pages 392-394, September.
    2. Medema, Steven G., 1999. "Symposium on the Coase Theorem: Legal Fiction: The Place of the Coase Theorem in Law and Economics," Economics and Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(2), pages 209-233, October.
    3. Ben, Chethna & Gounder, Neelesh, 2019. "Property rights: Principles of customary land and urban development in Fiji," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    4. Castro, Kássia Batista de & Roig, Henrique Llacer & Neumann, Marina Rolim Bilich & Rossi, Maria Silvia & Seraphim, Ana Paula Albuquerque Campos Castalonga & Réquia, Weeberb João & Costa, Alexandre Bar, 2019. "New perspectives in land use mapping based on urban morphology: A case study of the Federal District, Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Élodie Bertrand, 2006. "La thèse d'efficience du « théorème de Coase ». Quelle critique de la microéconomie ?," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 57(5), pages 983-1007.
    2. Christian Schubert, 2006. "Fairness in Urban Land Use: An Evolutionary Contribution to Law & Economics," Papers on Economics and Evolution 2005-22, Philipps University Marburg, Department of Geography.
    3. Yalcintas, Altug, 2010. "The ‘Coase Theorem’ vs. Coase theorem proper: How an error emerged and why it remained uncorrected so long," MPRA Paper 37936, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Patrick Schmitz, 2001. "The Coase Theorem, Private Information, and the Benefits of Not Assigning Property Rights," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 23-28, January.
    5. Steven G. Medema, 2010. "Ronald Harry Coase," Chapters, in: Ross B. Emmett (ed.), The Elgar Companion to the Chicago School of Economics, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Sadegh Fathi & Hassan Sajadzadeh & Faezeh Mohammadi Sheshkal & Farshid Aram & Gergo Pinter & Imre Felde & Amir Mosavi, 2020. "The Role of Urban Morphology Design on Enhancing Physical Activity and Public Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-29, March.
    7. Cheung, K.S. & Wong, S.K. & Wu, H. & Yiu, C.Y., 2021. "The land governance cost on co-ownership: A study of the cross-lease in New Zealand," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    8. Elodie Bertrand, 2019. "Much ado about nothing? The controversy over the validity of the Coase theorem," Post-Print hal-03479468, HAL.
    9. Steven Medema, 2011. "A case of mistaken identity: George Stigler, “The Problem of Social Cost,” and the Coase theorem," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 11-38, February.
    10. Antonio Nicita, 2014. "The legacy of R. Coase (1910–2013): toward a theory of institutional 'moving equilibrium'?," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 61(2), pages 93-108, June.
    11. Altug Yalcintas, 2013. "The Problem of Epistemic Cost: Why Do Economists Not Change Their Minds (About the “Coase Theorem”)?," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(5), pages 1131-1157, November.
    12. Steven G. Medema, 2020. "The Coase Theorem at Sixty," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 58(4), pages 1045-1128, December.
    13. Elodie Bertrand, 2010. "The three roles of the 'Coase theorem' in Coase's works," Post-Print hal-02409115, HAL.
    14. Élodie Bertrand & Christophe Destais, 2002. "Le « théorème de Coase », une réflexion sur les fondements microéconomiques de l'intervention publique," Reflets et perspectives de la vie économique, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 111-124.
    15. Martin Fleischmann & Alessandra Feliciotti & Ombretta Romice & Sergio Porta, 2022. "Methodological foundation of a numerical taxonomy of urban form," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(4), pages 1283-1299, May.
    16. George Halkos & Nicholas Kyriazis, 2003. "Property Rights and Game-Theory Implications of Satellite Communications: The Bilateral Case of Greece and Russia," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 233-250, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:3:p:256-:d:509539. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.