IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i2p196-d499609.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating Microclimate into Landscape Architecture for Outdoor Thermal Comfort: A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Jiawei Lin

    (Department of Landscape Architecture and Urban Planning, College of Architecture, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77840, USA)

  • Robert D. Brown

    (Department of Landscape Architecture and Urban Planning, College of Architecture, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77840, USA)

Abstract

Global climate change and urban heat island intensification are making many cities dangerously hot during heat waves and uncomfortably hot much of the time. Research has identified ways that urban environments can be designed to reduce the heat, but much of the information is too technical or has not been interpreted or communicated so as to be available to landscape architects. This study identifies ways that landscape architecture researchers have applied microclimate information in design to proactively create more thermally comfortable outdoor environments. A systematic review that assessed the growing recognition of microclimatic factors in design revealed four main approaches: principles and guidelines, strategies, mapping, and evaluation. The advantages and limitations of each have been noted, and a diagram has been developed that matches each approach with specific steps in the landscape architectural design process. The study also identified four areas where microclimate has potential for use in landscape architecture but that are currently not being very actively studied: education, modeling and visualization, policy, and ideation. Microclimatic design has the potential to enhance the health and well-being of the public through the design of thermally comfortable outdoor environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiawei Lin & Robert D. Brown, 2021. "Integrating Microclimate into Landscape Architecture for Outdoor Thermal Comfort: A Systematic Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-12, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:2:p:196-:d:499609
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/2/196/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/2/196/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wendy McWilliam & Andreas Wesener & Anupriya Sukumar & Robert D. Brown, 2020. "Reducing the Incidence of Skin Cancer through Landscape Architecture Design Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Michael Hebbert & Fionn Mackillop, 2013. "Urban Climatology Applied to Urban Planning: A Postwar Knowledge Circulation Failure," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(5), pages 1542-1558, September.
    3. Brian Webb, 2017. "The use of urban climatology in local climate change strategies: a comparative perspective," International Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 68-84, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Živa Ravnikar & Alfonso Bahillo & Barbara Goličnik Marušić, 2023. "A Protocol for Microclimate-Related Street Assessment and the Potential of Detailed Environmental Data for Better Consideration of Microclimatology in Urban Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-22, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yi Song Liu & Tan Yigitcanlar & Mirko Guaralda & Kenan Degirmenci & Aaron Liu & Michael Kane, 2022. "Leveraging the Opportunities of Wind for Cities through Urban Planning and Design: A PRISMA Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-78, September.
    2. Wolfgang Scholz & Tim Stober & Hannah Sassen, 2021. "Are Urban Planning Schools in the Global South Prepared for Current Challenges of Climate Change and Disaster Risks?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Claudine Strehl & Timo Heepenstrick & Peter Knuschke & Marc Wittlich, 2021. "Bringing Light into Darkness—Comparison of Different Personal Dosimeters for Assessment of Solar Ultraviolet Exposure," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-13, August.
    4. Patsy Healey, 2013. "Circuits of Knowledge and Techniques: The Transnational Flow of Planning Ideas and Practices," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(5), pages 1510-1526, September.
    5. Enora Robin & Laura Nkula-Wenz, 2021. "Beyond the success/failure of travelling urban models: Exploring the politics of time and performance in Cape Town’s East City," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(6), pages 1252-1273, September.
    6. Suzanne Jane Dobbinson & David Bard Buller & James Andrew Chamberlain & Jody Simmons & Mary Klein Buller, 2022. "Solar UV Measured under Built-Shade in Public Parks: Findings from a Randomized Trial in Denver and Melbourne," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-25, August.
    7. Simon Marvin & Jonathan Rutherford, 2018. "Controlled environments: An urban research agenda on microclimatic enclosure," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(6), pages 1143-1162, May.
    8. Andrew Harris & Susan Moore, 2013. "Planning Histories and Practices of Circulating Urban Knowledge," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(5), pages 1499-1509, September.
    9. Vanesa Castán Broto & Linda K. Westman, 2020. "Ten years after Copenhagen: Reimagining climate change governance in urban areas," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(4), July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:2:p:196-:d:499609. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.