IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i2p164-d494728.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Challenges Posed by Regulations for the Use of Drones in Agriculture in the African Context

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew Ayamga

    (Information Technology Group, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 8130, 6700 EW Wageningen, The Netherlands)

  • Bedir Tekinerdogan

    (Information Technology Group, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 8130, 6700 EW Wageningen, The Netherlands)

  • Ayalew Kassahun

    (Information Technology Group, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 8130, 6700 EW Wageningen, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Global food demands have led to the rapid introduction of Information Communication Technology (ICT) innovations in the agriculture sector—one such innovation is drone technology. Drones are used in precision agriculture, including aerial observation, sensing, and the spraying of pesticides. Regulations on the use of drones are necessary because drones can violate privacy rules, data protection rights, and public peace. However, many African countries have either very restrictive regulations, or no proper regulation in place, making the process of acquiring a license for drone operation cumbersome. In this study, we present the results of a literature review that explores the current drone regulations in Sub-Saharan Africa and the results of a systematic literature review (SLR) and survey study whereby we have interviewed the relevant stakeholders, in order to understand the challenges posed by the regulations to the effective use of drones for agriculture. The results indicate that the regulations contain about 40 to 85 per cent of the provisions of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) manual on Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPASs). In addition, whilst the SLR focused on the technology, safety, ethics and regulatory hurdles towards drones, the interviewees focused on the need for skill and awareness among the responsible authorities to enforce regulations, and the need for sustainability and participatory process in defining regulations.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew Ayamga & Bedir Tekinerdogan & Ayalew Kassahun, 2021. "Exploring the Challenges Posed by Regulations for the Use of Drones in Agriculture in the African Context," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-13, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:2:p:164-:d:494728
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/2/164/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/2/164/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joann F. de Zegher & Dan A. Iancu & Hau L. Lee, 2019. "Designing Contracts and Sourcing Channels to Create Shared Value," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 21(2), pages 271-289, May.
    2. Reece A. Clothier & Dominique A. Greer & Duncan G. Greer & Amisha M. Mehta, 2015. "Risk Perception and the Public Acceptance of Drones," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(6), pages 1167-1183, June.
    3. Luppicini, Rocci & So, Arthur, 2016. "A technoethical review of commercial drone use in the context of governance, ethics, and privacy," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 109-119.
    4. Freeman, P.K. & Freeland, R.S., 2014. "Politics & technology: U.S. polices restricting unmanned aerial systems in agriculture," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(P1), pages 302-311.
    5. Rao, Bharat & Gopi, Ashwin Goutham & Maione, Romana, 2016. "The societal impact of commercial drones," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 83-90.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Awais Ali & Tajamul Hussain & Noramon Tantashutikun & Nurda Hussain & Giacomo Cocetta, 2023. "Application of Smart Techniques, Internet of Things and Data Mining for Resource Use Efficient and Sustainable Crop Production," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, February.
    2. Abate, Gashaw T. & Abay, Kibrom A. & Chamberlin, Jordan & Kassim, Yumna & Spielman, David J. & Paul Jr Tabe-Ojong, Martin, 2023. "Digital tools and agricultural market transformation in Africa: Why are they not at scale yet, and what will it take to get there?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    3. Pompilica Iagăru & Pompiliu Pavel & Romulus Iagăru & Anca Șipoș, 2022. "Aerial Monitorization—A Vector for Ensuring the Agroecosystems Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-12, May.
    4. Ayamga, Matthew & Akaba, Selorm & Nyaaba, Albert Apotele, 2021. "Multifaceted applicability of drones: A review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    5. Matthew Ayamga & Abdelaziz Lawani & Selorm Akaba & Arsene Birindwa, 2023. "Developing Institutions and Inter-Organizational Synergies through Digitalization and Youth Engagement in African Agriculture: The Case of “Africa Goes Digital”," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, January.
    6. Nyaaba, Albert Apotele & Ayamga, Matthew, 2021. "Intricacies of medical drones in healthcare delivery: Implications for Africa," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anania, Emily C. & Rice, Stephen & Pierce, Matthew & Winter, Scott R. & Capps, John & Walters, Nathan W. & Milner, Mattie N., 2019. "Public support for police drone missions depends on political affiliation and neighborhood demographics," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 95-103.
    2. Komasová, Sarah & Tesař, Jakub & Soukup, Petr, 2020. "Perception of drone related risks in Czech society," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    3. Schmidt, Sebastian & Saraceni, Adriana, 2024. "Consumer acceptance of drone-based technology for last mile delivery," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    4. Vujičić, Miroslav D. & Kennell, James & Stankov, Uglješa & Gretzel, Ulrike & Vasiljević, Đorđije A. & Morrison, Alastair M., 2022. "Keeping up with the drones! Techno-social dimensions of tourist drone videography," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    5. Osakwe, Christian Nedu & Hudik, Marek & Říha, David & Stros, Michael & Ramayah, T., 2022. "Critical factors characterizing consumers’ intentions to use drones for last-mile delivery: Does delivery risk matter?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    6. Nelson, Jake & Gorichanaz, Tim, 2019. "Trust as an ethical value in emerging technology governance: The case of drone regulation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    7. Lee, Dasom & Hess, David J. & Heldeweg, Michiel A., 2022. "Safety and privacy regulations for unmanned aerial vehicles: A multiple comparative analysis," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    8. Casiano Flores, Cesar & Tan, Evrim & Crompvoets, Joep, 2021. "Governance assessment of UAV implementation in Kenyan land administration system," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    9. Merkert, Rico & Bushell, James, 2020. "Managing the drone revolution: A systematic literature review into the current use of airborne drones and future strategic directions for their effective control," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    10. Haula, Kitonsa & Agbozo, Ebenezer, 2020. "A systematic review on unmanned aerial vehicles in Sub-Saharan Africa: A socio-technical perspective," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    11. Wang, Ning & Mutzner, Nico & Blanchet, Karl, 2023. "Societal acceptance of urban drones: A scoping literature review," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    12. Brents, Robert G. & Winter, Scott R. & Gawron, Valerie & Keebler, Joseph R., 2024. "Intention to complain about unmanned aircraft system noise: A structural equation analysis," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    13. Huang, Chenyu & Chen, Yu-Che & Harris, Joseph, 2021. "Regulatory compliance and socio-demographic analyses of civil Unmanned Aircraft Systems users," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    14. Henderson, Isaac Levi & Shelley, Andrew, 2023. "Examining unmanned aircraft user compliance with Civil Aviation Rules: The case of New Zealand," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 176-185.
    15. Aditya Kamat & Saket Shanker & Akhilesh Barve & Kamalakanta Muduli & Sachin Kumar Mangla & Sunil Luthra, 2022. "Uncovering interrelationships between barriers to unmanned aerial vehicles in humanitarian logistics," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 1134-1160, December.
    16. Aydin, Burchan, 2019. "Public acceptance of drones: Knowledge, attitudes, and practice," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    17. Fahim Ullah & Samad M. E. Sepasgozar & Changxin Wang, 2018. "A Systematic Review of Smart Real Estate Technology: Drivers of, and Barriers to, the Use of Digital Disruptive Technologies and Online Platforms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-44, September.
    18. Jacek Buko & Marek Bulsa & Adam Makowski, 2022. "Spatial Premises and Key Conditions for the Use of UAVs for Delivery of Items on the Example of the Polish Courier and Postal Services Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, February.
    19. Haoran Zhao & Huiru Zhao & Sen Guo, 2018. "Short-Term Wind Electric Power Forecasting Using a Novel Multi-Stage Intelligent Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-19, March.
    20. Li, Guangpei & Wang, Xiaoyu & Wu, Jinhua, 2019. "How scientific researchers form green innovation behavior: An empirical analysis of China's enterprises," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 134-146.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:2:p:164-:d:494728. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.