IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i2p120-d487654.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital Transformation of Land Services in Indonesia: A Readiness Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Kusmiarto Kusmiarto

    (Department of Geodetic Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia
    Sekolah Tinggi Pertanahan Nasional, Yogyakarta 55293, Indonesia)

  • Trias Aditya

    (Department of Geodetic Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia)

  • Djurdjani Djurdjani

    (Department of Geodetic Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia)

  • Subaryono Subaryono

    (Department of Geodetic Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia)

Abstract

In 2020, digital transformation was a major theme to commemorate Indonesia’s main agrarian law’s anniversary. This theme is a reminder of the need to fully implement digital services to improve the quality of land registration products that are cheap, easy to operate, perform quickly, and are trusted by the community. However, no research has comprehensively assessed the readiness of the digital transformation of land services in Indonesia. This paper aims to evaluate the readiness of a land office to achieve digital transformation visions. Here, we apply the Digital Governance Assessment Framework (DGRA), adapted to the land service sector, as the basis for conducting this evaluation. The nine core indicators of the DGRA toolkit are used as a basis for assessment. Desk studies were conducted to identify formal legislation and to find the technical specifications. Direct observations and in-depth interviews were conducted with stakeholders to find user needs and evaluate the implementation of current regulations on the land service business process. Quality assessment was carried out on land registration data at the Land Office of Yogyakarta City as a sample. The quality assessment results indicate a problem with completeness, conformity, consistency, accuracy, duplication, and integrity. In conclusion, the readiness level still needs improvement, especially in the indicator related to Cyber Security, Privacy, and Resilience (1.0). Even though the Leadership and Governance, User-Centered Design, and Public Administration Reforms and Change Management sections shows a reasonably high score (≥2.0), other core sections, namely Technology Infrastructure (1.7), Legislation and Regulation (1.4), Data Infrastructure, Strategies, and Governance (1.8) are mediocre, and therefore they need improvement.

Suggested Citation

  • Kusmiarto Kusmiarto & Trias Aditya & Djurdjani Djurdjani & Subaryono Subaryono, 2021. "Digital Transformation of Land Services in Indonesia: A Readiness Assessment," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-16, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:2:p:120-:d:487654
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/2/120/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/2/120/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Solomon Dargie Chekole & Walter Timo de Vries & Gebeyehu Belay Shibeshi, 2020. "An Evaluation Framework for Urban Cadastral System Policy in Ethiopia," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Klaus Deininger & Harris Selod & Anthony Burns, 2012. "The Land Governance Assessment Framework : Identifying and Monitoring Good Practice in the Land Sector," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 2376.
    3. Shibeshi, Gebeyehu Belay & Fuchs, Helmut & Mansberger, Reinfried, 2015. "Lessons from Systematic Evaluation of Land Administration Systems. The Case of Amhara National Regional State of Ethiopia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 282-295.
    4. Elizabeth A. Wentz & Melinda Shimizu, 2018. "Measuring Spatial Data Fitness-for-Use through Multiple Criteria Decision Making," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 108(4), pages 1150-1167, July.
    5. Trias Aditya & Eva Maria-Unger & Christelle vd Berg & Rohan Bennett & Paul Saers & Han Lukman Syahid & Doni Erwan & Tjeerd Wits & Nurrohmat Widjajanti & Purnama Budi Santosa & Dedi Atunggal & Imam Han, 2020. "Participatory Land Administration in Indonesia: Quality and Usability Assessment," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-27, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Solomon Dargie Chekole & Walter Timo de Vries & Pamela Durán-Díaz & Gebeyehu Belay Shibeshi, 2020. "Performance Evaluation of the Urban Cadastral System in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Mequanent, Getachew, 2016. "The Application of Traditional Dispute Resolution in Land Administration in Lay Armachiho Woreda (District), Northern Ethiopia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 171-179.
    3. Carmen Femenia-Ribera & Gaspar Mora-Navarro & Jose Carlos Martinez-Llario, 2021. "Advances in the Coordination between the Cadastre and Land Registry," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, January.
    4. Aditya, Trias & Sucaya, I Ketut Gede Ary & Nugroho Adi, Fajar, 2021. "LADM-compliant field data collector for cadastral surveyors," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    5. Jahani Chehrehbargh, Fatemeh & Rajabifard, Abbas & Atazadeh, Behnam & Steudler, Daniel, 2024. "Identifying global parameters for advancing Land Administration Systems," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    6. Rabah Arezki & Klaus Deininger & Harris Selod, 2015. "What Drives the Global "Land Rush"?," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 29(2), pages 207-233.
    7. Hajji, Rafika & El Asri, Hanae & Ez-Zriouli, Chaymae, 2023. "Upgrading to 3D cadastre in Morocco: Lessons learned from benchmarking of international 3D cadastral systems," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    8. Lupale Mubanga & Hampwaye Godfrey, 2019. "Inclusiveness of Urban Land Administration in the City of Lusaka, Zambia," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 46(46), pages 53-70, December.
    9. Stöcker, Claudia & Bennett, Rohan & Koeva, Mila & Nex, Francesco & Zevenbergen, Jaap, 2022. "Scaling up UAVs for land administration: Towards the plateau of productivity," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    10. Thierry Ngoga & Francois Ntaganda & Karim Tushabe & David Niyonsenga & Nadia Ingabire & Pothin Muvara, 2017. "Land Governance Assessment Framework," World Bank Publications - Reports 28492, The World Bank Group.
    11. Solomon Dargie Chekole & Walter Timo de Vries & Gebeyehu Belay Shibeshi, 2020. "An Evaluation Framework for Urban Cadastral System Policy in Ethiopia," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-15, February.
    12. Nikita Sud, 2020. "The Unfixed State of Unfixed Land," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 51(5), pages 1175-1198, September.
    13. Björn Hoops & Nicholas K. Tagliarino, 2019. "The Legal Boundaries of ‘Public Purpose’ in India and South Africa: A Comparative Assessment in Light of the Voluntary Guidelines," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-21, October.
    14. Aditya, Trias & Santosa, Purnama Budi & Yulaikhah, Yulaikhah & Widjajanti, Nurrohmat & Atunggal, Dedi & Sulistyawati, Miranty, 2021. "Title Validation and collaborative mapping to accelerate quality assurance of land registration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    15. Worku Nega & Mulugeta Tenaw & Yeneneh Hunie & Sayeh Kassaw Agegnehu & Reinfried Mansberger, 2021. "Evaluating Institutional Dichotomy between Urban and Rural Land Administration in Amhara Region, Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    16. Rignall, Karen & Kusunose, Yoko, 2018. "Governing livelihood and land use transitions: The role of customary tenure in southeastern Morocco," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 91-103.
    17. Rosemond Owusu Ansah & Zaid Abubakari & Benjamin Quaye & Dimo Todorovski & Chipofya Malumbo & Christiaan Lemmen, 2024. "Navigating the Terrain of Digital Transition: Ghana’s Journey of Developing a Digital Land Information System," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-28, April.
    18. Ringo Willy Tenga & Sist J. Mramba, 2015. "Tanzania LGAF Synthesis Report," World Bank Publications - Reports 28512, The World Bank Group.
    19. Ephraim Kabunda Munshifwa & Wilson Ngoma & Ikugile Makenja, 2017. "Major Determinant of Physical Development on Urban Residential Land: The Case of Kalulushi Municipality in Zambia," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 5(6), pages 79-89, June.
    20. Klimach, Anna & Dawidowicz, Agnieszka & Źróbek, Ryszard, 2018. "The Polish land administration system supporting good governance," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 547-555.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:2:p:120-:d:487654. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.