Author
Listed:
- Alejandro Huertas Herrera
(Laboratorio de Recursos Agroforestales, Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Houssay 200, 9410 Ushuaia, Tierra del Fuego, Argentina)
- Brigitte L. G. Baptiste Ballera
(Rectoría, Universidad EAN, Carrera 11 # 78-47, 110221 Bogotá, Cundinamarca, Colombia
Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Calle 28A # 15-09, 111311 Bogotá, Cundinamarca, Colombia)
- Mónica D. R. Toro-Manríquez
(Laboratorio de Recursos Agroforestales, Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Houssay 200, 9410 Ushuaia, Tierra del Fuego, Argentina)
- María V. Lencinas
(Laboratorio de Recursos Agroforestales, Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Houssay 200, 9410 Ushuaia, Tierra del Fuego, Argentina)
- Guillermo J. Martínez Pastur
(Laboratorio de Recursos Agroforestales, Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Houssay 200, 9410 Ushuaia, Tierra del Fuego, Argentina)
- Hugoberto Huertas Ramírez
(Fundación Horizonte Verde, Calle 10 # 20-64, 501021 Cumaral, Meta, Colombia)
Abstract
Cattle grazing and fire are common types of management on natural ecosystems, generating several threats to the conservation of native vegetation (e.g., changes in species richness, cover, and abundance, mainly of bovine-palatable species). In this work, we analysed the response of the structure and composition of vegetation managed with different cattle stocking rates and fire in the savanna ecosystems of Colombia. The study was located in the eastern area of the Llanos region, where savannas were subjected to grazing and burning. Regarding grazing, we classified the area according to the cattle stocking rate ( Bos indicus ~300 kg): NG = non-grazed, LS = low stocking rate (0.5 ind ha −1 yr −1 ), and HS = high stocking rate (1.0 ind ha −1 yr −1 ). Controlled artificial burning was applied in all the area at the beginning of the study, and surveys were conducted in the same plots at pre-burn ( t 0) and four post-burn times ( t 1, t 2, t 3, t 4), at 15, 45, 75 and 105 days after burning. Vegetation composition (species list, life-form, palatability) and structure (bare soil and vascular plant ground covers, species height and richness) were recorded at each sampling. Data were compared through ANOVAs and multivariate analyses. We found 53 species in total: 26 in the pre-burn treatment and 44 in the post-burn treatments, detecting an increase of 18 species considering all treatments. Seven natives and two exotic species represented the dominant cover (>50%). LS and HS had the highest number of palatable species in t 0 (seven species) compared with NG (two species), but this became similar after burning (14 species in NG, 12 in LS, and 11 in HS). ANOVAs and multivariate analyses showed that plant assemblages were significantly different according to the grazing treatment, and more homogeneous in pre-burn than in post-burn periods. Cattle grazing favored higher covers of dominant palatable species (e.g., Axonopus purpusii ) compared with NG, but many native species with high palatability only recovered within the system after burning. In the context of the current management proposals, the search for new alternatives other than intensive cattle grazing and burning is needed to reconcile human production activities, international commitments against climate change and biodiversity conservation in the savanna landscapes.
Suggested Citation
Alejandro Huertas Herrera & Brigitte L. G. Baptiste Ballera & Mónica D. R. Toro-Manríquez & María V. Lencinas & Guillermo J. Martínez Pastur & Hugoberto Huertas Ramírez, 2021.
"Changes in Vegetation of Flooded Savannas Subject to Cattle Grazing and Fire in Plains of Colombia,"
Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-14, January.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:2:p:108-:d:485782
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Carriazo, Fernando & Labarta, Ricardo & Escobedo, Francisco J., 2020.
"Incentivizing sustainable rangeland practices and policies in Colombia’s Orinoco region,"
Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
- Geoffrey J. Lipsett-Moore & Nicholas H. Wolff & Edward T. Game, 2018.
"Emissions mitigation opportunities for savanna countries from early dry season fire management,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-8, December.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
- Sangha, Kamaljit K & Evans, Jay & Edwards, Andrew & Russell-Smith, Jeremy & Fisher, Rohan & Yates, Cameron & Costanza, Robert, 2021.
"Assessing the value of ecosystem services delivered by prescribed fire management in Australian tropical savannas,"
Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
- Ribeiro, N.S. & Armstrong, Amanda Hildt & Fischer, Rico & Kim, Yeon-Su & Shugart, Herman Henry & Ribeiro-Barros, Ana I. & Chauque, Aniceto & Tear, T. & Washington-Allen, Robert & Bandeira, Romana R., 2021.
"Prediction of forest parameters and carbon accounting under different fire regimes in Miombo woodlands, Niassa Special Reserve, Northern Mozambique,"
Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
- Romy Greiner, 2023.
"Examining Participation in and Supply of Private Land for Voluntary Conservation in Australia’s Tropical Savannas: A Discrete-Continuous Choice Experiment,"
Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, June.
- Michelle McKemey & Emilie Ens & Yugul Mangi Rangers & Oliver Costello & Nick Reid, 2020.
"Indigenous Knowledge and Seasonal Calendar Inform Adaptive Savanna Burning in Northern Australia,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, January.
- Azadi, Hossein & Petrescu, Dacinia Crina & Petrescu-Mag, Ruxandra Malina & Ozunu, Alexandru, 2020.
"Special issue: Environmental risk mitigation for sustainable land use development,"
Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:2:p:108-:d:485782. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.