IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i10p1048-d650648.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

South Africa’s Red List of Terrestrial Ecosystems (RLEs)

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Luke Skowno

    (Kirstenbosch Research Centre, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Cape Town 7700, South Africa
    Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town 7700, South Africa)

  • Maphale Stella Monyeki

    (Kirstenbosch Research Centre, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Cape Town 7700, South Africa)

Abstract

Ecosystem level indicators are emerging as important pillars of the post-2020 global biodiversity framework of the Convention on Biological Diversity; at the same time, the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems (RLEs) is experiencing rapid global uptake. We applied a systematic RLE assessment to 456 terrestrial ecosystems in South Africa between 2017 and 2021. What sets South Africa apart in this endeavour is that an independently formulated ecosystem threat status indicator was developed between 2004 and 2008 and the list of threatened ecosystems (effectively a proto RLE) was integrated into the national environmental regulatory framework in 2011. Through this, Critically Endangered and Endangered types were afforded a form of statutory protection through increased regulation of land-use change activities. We describe the transition to the IUCN RLE framework and focus on both the technical steps of incorporating the best available data into a credible assessment, and the unique social and legal processes to ensure that the biodiversity conservation sector in South Africa understood and supported the proposed replacement of the existing list of threatened ecosystems (2011) with the RLE (2021). We discuss the policy development steps required in South Africa, and the pros and cons of maintaining a legislative link for RLE implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Luke Skowno & Maphale Stella Monyeki, 2021. "South Africa’s Red List of Terrestrial Ecosystems (RLEs)," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-14, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:10:p:1048-:d:650648
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/10/1048/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/10/1048/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Julien CALAS & Antoine GODIN & Paul HADJI-LAZARO & Pamela SEKESE & Andrew SKOWNO, 2023. "Socioeconomic and spatially-explicit assessment of Nature-related risks: the case of South Africa," Working Paper 199e7bd0-7dfd-4a54-bc1d-9, Agence française de développement.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:10:p:1048-:d:650648. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.