IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v18y2025i3p115-d1597926.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing Auditor Judgment Quality: A Review of Evidence from Experimental Research

Author

Listed:
  • Renny Friska

    (Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya 60115, Indonesia)

  • Dian Agustia

    (Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya 60115, Indonesia)

Abstract

We review 30 experimental auditing research papers published in four leading accounting and auditing journals from 2001 to 2023 to address three key issues. First, we identify trends in experimental auditing research and find that most studies are published in Behavioral Research in Accounting due to its focus on behavioral and psychological aspects of auditing. Second, to enhance the audit quality, we map this research to the task–person and interpersonal interaction framework. The findings indicate that most studies focus on audit task complexity, individual auditor attributes, and their interactions with stakeholders, addressing factors that influence auditor judgment quality. Third, by analyzing the characteristics of experimental studies, we highlight the evolution in the topics explored and participant types over the past two decades. These insights provide valuable guidance for future research and practical implications for improved audit judgment and decision-making processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Renny Friska & Dian Agustia, 2025. "Enhancing Auditor Judgment Quality: A Review of Evidence from Experimental Research," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-18, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:115-:d:1597926
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/3/115/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/3/115/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:115-:d:1597926. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.