IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v18y2025i1p36-d1567516.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Basel Capital Regulations: Exploring the Risk and Efficiency Relationship in Emerging Economies

Author

Listed:
  • Adnan Bashir

    (Department of Management Sciences, University of Gujrat, Punjab 50700, Pakistan)

  • Asma Salman

    (College of Business Administration, American University in the Emirates, Dubai P.O. Box 503000, United Arab Emirates)

  • Rania Itani

    (College of Business, Murdoch University Dubai, Dubai P.O. Box 500700, United Arab Emirates)

  • Alessio Faccia

    (School of Business and Law, University of Birmingham Dubai, Dubai P.O. Box 341799, United Arab Emirates)

Abstract

This research investigates the relationship between Basel capital regulations, bank risk, and bank efficiency in the context of Pakistani and Indian commercial banks. This study examines the period from 2009 to 2022 and specifically analyses the impact of Basel III capital requirements on risk and efficiency. Quantitative methods are employed, utilising data from central bank websites and the BankScope database to construct a comprehensive sample of commercial banks in Pakistan and India. The system-generalised method of moments (GMM) estimation technique addresses potential endogeneity issues in the regression models. The findings shed light on the effectiveness of these regulations and provide insights for policymakers and regulators in both countries. The results indicate that Basel capital regulations have generally increased banks’ risk-taking behaviour in Pakistan and India. However, they have not improved the overall efficiency of the banking sector in either country. Bank efficiency declined during the study period, highlighting the limited effectiveness of Basel capital regulations in enhancing efficiency. Furthermore, the impact of these regulations on risk and efficiency varies between the two countries. In Pakistan, the regulations do not significantly affect bank efficiency, while in India, they decrease efficiency. Additionally, Basel III capital regulations do not significantly impact the risk taken by banks in either country. This study concludes by emphasising the need for alternative mechanisms or policies to improve the banking industry’s efficiency, as Basel capital regulations alone have proven ineffective. The findings offer valuable insights for central banks and regulators in assessing the relationship between capital regulations, risk, and efficiency and implementing appropriate measures to enhance the performance of the banking sector. This study recommends the following key points: the adoption of tailored regulatory approaches to address specific challenges, achieving an optimal balance between risk management and operational efficiency, enhancing the effectiveness of management roles, considering the influence of macroeconomic factors, and evaluating the implications of long-term policy development for sustainable progress. The present study adds to the prevalent literature on the impact of capital regulations on bank risk and efficiency nexus. This study focuses on Pakistan and India, which are two important developing nations. Moreover, another important contribution of this study lies in the effect of Basel III capital regulation on bank risk, as these capital regulations are different from other Basel capital requirements.

Suggested Citation

  • Adnan Bashir & Asma Salman & Rania Itani & Alessio Faccia, 2025. "Assessing Basel Capital Regulations: Exploring the Risk and Efficiency Relationship in Emerging Economies," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-18, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:1:p:36-:d:1567516
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/1/36/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/1/36/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Berger, Allen N. & DeYoung, Robert, 1997. "Problem loans and cost efficiency in commercial banks," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 21(6), pages 849-870, June.
    2. Sarmiento, Miguel & Galán, Jorge E., 2017. "The influence of risk-taking on bank efficiency: Evidence from Colombia," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 52-73.
    3. Rafael La Porta & Florencio Lopez‐De‐Silanes & Andrei Shleifer, 2002. "Government Ownership of Banks," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 57(1), pages 265-301, February.
    4. Tan, Yong & Floros, Christos, 2013. "Risk, capital and efficiency in Chinese banking," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 378-393.
    5. Fernandez de Guevara, Juan & Maudos, Joaquin & Perez, Francisco, 2007. "Integration and competition in the European financial markets," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 26-45, February.
    6. Manthos D. Delis & Philip Molyneux & Fotios Pasiouras, 2011. "Regulations and Productivity Growth in Banking: Evidence from Transition Economies," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 43(4), pages 735-764, June.
    7. Pessarossi, Pierre & Weill, Laurent, 2015. "Do capital requirements affect cost efficiency? Evidence from China," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 119-127.
    8. Syed Abul Basher & Lawrence M. Kessler & Murat K. Munkin, 2017. "Bank capital and portfolio risk among Islamic banks," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(1), pages 1-9, September.
    9. David Roodman, 2009. "How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 9(1), pages 86-136, March.
    10. Yener Altunbas & Santiago Carbo & Edward P.M. Gardener & Philip Molyneux, 2007. "Examining the Relationships between Capital, Risk and Efficiency in European Banking," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 13(1), pages 49-70, January.
    11. Iannotta, Giuliano & Nocera, Giacomo & Sironi, Andrea, 2007. "Ownership structure, risk and performance in the European banking industry," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(7), pages 2127-2149, July.
    12. Jitka Lesanovska & Laurent Weill, 2015. "Does Greater Capital Hamper the Cost Efficiency of Banks?," Working Papers 2015/10, Czech National Bank.
    13. Rime, Bertrand, 2001. "Capital requirements and bank behaviour: Empirical evidence for Switzerland," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 789-805, April.
    14. Badar Nadeem Ashraf & Sidra Arshad & Yuancheng Hu, 2016. "Capital Regulation and Bank Risk-Taking Behavior: Evidence from Pakistan," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-20, August.
    15. Banker, Rajiv D. & Chang, Hsihui & Lee, Seok-Young, 2010. "Differential impact of Korean banking system reforms on bank productivity," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(7), pages 1450-1460, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bitar, Mohammad & Pukthuanthong, Kuntara & Walker, Thomas, 2018. "The effect of capital ratios on the risk, efficiency and profitability of banks: Evidence from OECD countries," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 227-262.
    2. Salma Louati & Younes Boujelbene, 2021. "Basel Regulations and Banks’ Risk-efficiency Nexus: Evidence from Dynamic Simultaneous-equation Models," Journal of African Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 578-602, October.
    3. Saeed, Momna & Izzeldin, Marwan & Hassan, M. Kabir & Pappas, Vasileios, 2020. "The inter-temporal relationship between risk, capital and efficiency: The case of Islamic and conventional banks," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    4. Nazmoon Akhter, 2021. "Assessing the Relationship between Efficiency, Capital and Risk of Commercial Banks in Bangladesh," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(1), pages 1-55, July.
    5. Abdul RASHID* & Muhammad KHALID**, 2018. "An Assessment Of Bank Capital Effects On Bank-Risk-Taking In Pakistan," Pakistan Journal of Applied Economics, Applied Economics Research Centre, vol. 28(2), pages 213-234.
    6. Changjun Zheng & Mohammed Mizanur Rahman & Munni Begum & Badar Nadeem Ashraf, 2017. "Capital Regulation, the Cost of Financial Intermediation and Bank Profitability: Evidence from Bangladesh," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-24, April.
    7. Dang, Van Dan & Dang, Van Cuong, 2020. "The conditioning role of performance on the bank risk-taking channel of monetary policy: Evidence from a multiple-tool regime," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    8. Syed Moudud-Ul-Huq & Rabaka Akter & Tanmay Biswas, 2020. "Impact of Financial Crisis on Credit Risk: Pre- and Post-financial Crises 
in an Emerging Economy," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 9(2), pages 118-132, June.
    9. Imad Jabbouri & Maryem Naili & Hamza Almustafa & Rachid Jabbouri, 2023. "Does ownership concentration affect banks’ credit risk? Evidence from MENA emerging markets," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(1), pages 119-140, January.
    10. Do Van Anh,, 2022. "Does better capitalization enhance bank efficiency and limit risk taking? Evidence from ASEAN commercial banks," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    11. Van Dan Dang, 2019. "Should Vietnamese Banks Need More Equity? Evidence on Risk-Return Trade-Off in Dynamic Models of Banking," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-13, May.
    12. Changjun Zheng & Anupam Das Gupta & Syed Moudud-Ul-Huq, 2017. "Do market competition and development indicators matter for banks’ risk, capital, and efficiency relationship?," International Journal of Financial Engineering (IJFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 4(02n03), pages 1-27, June.
    13. Tan, Yong & Walheer, Barnabé, 2024. "Stability and economic performances in the banking industry: The case of China," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 326-345.
    14. Kanga, Désiré & Murinde, Victor & Soumaré, Issouf, 2020. "Capital, risk and profitability of WAEMU banks: Does bank ownership matter?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    15. Zheng, Changjun & Moudud-Ul-Huq, Syed & Rahman, Mohammad Morshedur & Ashraf, Badar Nadeem, 2017. "Does the ownership structure matter for banks’ capital regulation and risk-taking behavior? Empirical evidence from a developing country," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 404-421.
    16. repec:ipg:wpaper:2014-413 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Laxmi Koju & Ram Koju & Shouyang Wang, 2018. "Does Banking Management Affect Credit Risk? Evidence from the Indian Banking System," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-11, July.
    18. Bitar, Mohammad & Saad, Wadad & Benlemlih, Mohammed, 2016. "Bank risk and performance in the MENA region: The importance of capital requirements," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 398-421.
    19. Faisal Abbas & Omar Masood & Shoaib Ali & Sohail Rizwan, 2021. "How Do Capital Ratios Affect Bank Risk-Taking: New Evidence From the United States," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440209, January.
    20. Marcelin, Isaac & Lo, Gaye-Del & Sène, Babacar & Sun, Wei & Teclezion, Mussie, 2024. "Financial intermediation around national elections: Evidence of state-owned banks as credit smoothers," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    21. Lee, Chien-Chiang & Hsieh, Meng-Fen, 2013. "The impact of bank capital on profitability and risk in Asian banking," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 251-281.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:1:p:36-:d:1567516. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.