IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v17y2024i8p352-d1455210.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bibliometric Analysis of the Machine Learning Applications in Fraud Detection on Crowdfunding Platforms

Author

Listed:
  • Luis F. Cardona

    (Facultad de Minas, Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Medellín, Medellín 050001, Colombia)

  • Jaime A. Guzmán-Luna

    (Facultad de Minas, Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Medellín, Medellín 050001, Colombia)

  • Jaime A. Restrepo-Carmona

    (Facultad de Minas, Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Medellín, Medellín 050001, Colombia)

Abstract

Crowdfunding platforms are important for startups, since they offer diverse financing options, market validation, and promotional opportunities through an investor community. These platforms provide detailed company information, aiding informed investment decisions within a regulated and secure environment. Machine learning (ML) techniques are important in analyzing large data sets, detecting anomalies and fraud, and enhancing decision-making and business strategies. A systematic review employed PRISMA guidelines, which studied how ML improves fraud detection on digital crowdfunding platforms. The analysis includes English-language studies from peer-reviewed journals published between 2018 and 2023 to analyze the pre- and post-COVID-19 pandemic. The findings indicate that ML techniques such as Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and Artificial Neural Networks significantly enhance the predictive accuracy and utility of tax planning for startups considering equity crowdfunding. The United States, Germany, Canada, Italy, and Turkey do not present statistically significant differences at the 95% confidence level, standing out for their notable academic visibility. Florida Atlantic and Cornell Universities, Springer and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. publishing houses, and the Journal of Business Ethics and Management Science magazines present the highest citations without statistical differences at the 95% confidence level.

Suggested Citation

  • Luis F. Cardona & Jaime A. Guzmán-Luna & Jaime A. Restrepo-Carmona, 2024. "Bibliometric Analysis of the Machine Learning Applications in Fraud Detection on Crowdfunding Platforms," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-23, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:8:p:352-:d:1455210
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/8/352/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/8/352/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Antonella Francesca Cicchiello & Francesca Battaglia & Stefano Monferrà, 2019. "Crowdfunding tax incentives in Europe: a comparative analysis," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(18), pages 1856-1882, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sara Picas & Pedro Reis & António Pinto & José Luís Abrantes, 2021. "Does Tax, Financial, and Government Incentives Impact Long-Term Portuguese SMEs’ Sustainable Company Performance?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Harrison, Richard T. & Bock, Adam J. & Gregson, Geoff, 2020. "Stairway to heaven? rethinking angel investment policy and practice," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 14(C).
    3. Francesca Battaglia & Marika Carboni & Antonella Francesca Cicchiello & Stefano MonferrÃ, 2021. "Assessing the Effects of Anti-corruption Law on Entrepreneurial Finance: Evidence from Latin America," Journal of Emerging Market Finance, Institute for Financial Management and Research, vol. 20(1), pages 48-78, April.
    4. Camilla Civardi & Andrea Moro & Joakim Winborg, 2024. "“All that glitters is not gold!”: The (Unexplored) Determinants of Equity Crowdfunding," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 299-324, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:8:p:352-:d:1455210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.