IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v17y2024i5p184-d1385999.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Risk, Subsidy, and Bid-Criteria on the Private Investment in Public–Private Partnerships in Infrastructure Projects

Author

Listed:
  • Mohinder Dugal

    (Ancell School of Business, Western Connecticut University, Danbury, CT 06810, USA)

  • Shalini Rahul Tiwari

    (Institute of Management Technology, Ghaziabad 201001, India)

Abstract

Public–Private Partnerships (PPPs) are formed to finance and deliver large infrastructural projects that may not be entirely feasible by governments alone. This study investigates the intricate role of financial risks, subsidies, and bidding criteria in the context of PPPs in India, and their relationship to the amount and extent of investments made by private partners. Studies have claimed that the success of PPP projects is determined by the type of funding, the nature of risk undertaken by investors, and the bidding criteria used by a government to attract investors. However, there is sparse literature on these variables impacting the private investment in these projects. Thus, in an attempt to address this gap, we collated data from the World Bank for a ten-year period (i.e., 2009 to 2019) for the study variables, and used regression to analyze the hypotheses, while adopting both SPSS 24 and PROCESS Macro. This study disapproved some commonly held notions of risk relationships, such as the government using “viability gap” funding to attract private investment, and that “leverage” does not moderate the relationship between risk assumed and private investment, thereby contributing to the literature on private investment in PPPs as impacted by several factors. This study is among the first to recognize and elaborate on financial risk relationships, specifically in the context of Indian PPPs. These findings are significant for both private and public participants in terms of financial considerations in PPP projects, especially within the ambits of emerging markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohinder Dugal & Shalini Rahul Tiwari, 2024. "Impact of Risk, Subsidy, and Bid-Criteria on the Private Investment in Public–Private Partnerships in Infrastructure Projects," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-18, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:5:p:184-:d:1385999
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/5/184/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/5/184/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kate Bayliss & Elisa Van Waeyenberge, 2018. "Unpacking the Public Private Partnership Revival," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(4), pages 577-593, April.
    2. Simon J Evenett, 2019. "Protectionism, state discrimination, and international business since the onset of the Global Financial Crisis," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 2(1), pages 9-36, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Evgeny N. Smirnov & Sergey A. Lukyanov, 2021. "Instability of international trade and approaches to optimal regulation," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 12(5), pages 21-31, November.
    2. Holger Breinlich & Elsa Leromain & Dennis Novy & Thomas Sampson, 2019. "Exchange Rates and Consumer Prices: Evidence from Brexit," CESifo Working Paper Series 8001, CESifo.
    3. Deleidi, Matteo & Mazzucato, Mariana & Semieniuk, Gregor, 2020. "Neither crowding in nor out: Public direct investment mobilising private investment into renewable electricity projects," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    4. Cappariello, Rita & Franco-Bedoya, Sebastian & Gunnella, Vanessa & Ottaviano, Gianmarco I. P., 2020. "Rising protectionism and global value chains: quantifying the general equilibrium effects," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 108423, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Agnihotri, Arpita & Bhattacharya, Saurabh & Jafari-Sadeghi, Vahid, 2023. "Combatting global disruption through tertius iungens orientation of CEOs: A moderated-mediated mechanism," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(5).
    6. Ana Carolina Cordilha, 2020. "How Financialization Reshapes Public Health Care Systems : The Case of Assurance Maladie," Working Papers hal-02525884, HAL.
    7. Stanojević Nataša, 2020. "Deglobalization of the World Economy and its Effects on the Western Balkan Countries," Economic Themes, Sciendo, vol. 58(3), pages 343-362, September.
    8. Bernard Hoekman & Douglas Nelson, 2020. "Rethinking international subsidy rules," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(12), pages 3104-3132, December.
    9. André Brotto Reigado & Simon J. Evenett & Fernando Martin, 2023. "Towards meaningful transparency at the WTO: Reinforcing the trade policy review mechanism," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(12), pages 3435-3454, December.
    10. Anna Alon & Oksana Kim, 2022. "Protectionism through legislative layering: Implications for auditors and investors," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(3), pages 363-383, September.
    11. Bernard Hoekman & Douglas Nelson, 2020. "Subsidies, Spillovers and Multilateral Cooperation," RSCAS Working Papers 2020/12, European University Institute.
    12. Dessie Tarko Ambaw & Shandre Mugan Thangavelu, 2022. "Industrial subsidies and impact on exports of trading partners: Case of China," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 1310-1337, August.
    13. Gammeltoft, Peter & Panibratov, Andrei, 2024. "Emerging market multinationals and the politics of internationalization," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(3).
    14. Anis Chowdhury & Jomo Kwame Sundaram, 2023. "Chronicles of Debt Crises Foretold," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 54(5), pages 994-1030, September.
    15. Yadong Luo & Ari Assche, 2023. "The rise of techno-geopolitical uncertainty: Implications of the United States CHIPS and Science Act," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 54(8), pages 1423-1440, October.
    16. Alexandra Langford & Geoffrey Lawrence & Kiah Smith, 2021. "Financialization for Development? Asset Making on Indigenous Land in Remote Northern Australia," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 52(3), pages 574-597, May.
    17. Bayliss, Kate & Pollen, Gabriel, 2021. "The power paradigm in practice: A critical review of developments in the Zambian electricity sector," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    18. Yadong Luo, 2024. "Paradigm shift and theoretical implications for the era of global disorder," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 55(2), pages 127-135, March.
    19. Liena Kano & Eric W. K. Tsang & Henry Wai-chung Yeung, 2020. "Global value chains: A review of the multi-disciplinary literature," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 51(4), pages 577-622, June.
    20. Zheng, Weiting & Zheng, Yaqin & Yi, Jingtao & Shaheer, Noman & Li, Sali, 2024. "Context matters: The signaling role of foreign bidders’ reputation in cross-border acquisition contests," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 59(4).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:5:p:184-:d:1385999. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.