IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v17y2024i4p166-d1378345.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investor Perception of ESG Performance: Examining Investment Intentions in the Chinese Stock Market with Social Self-Efficacy Moderation

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaojia Zhang

    (SolBridge International School of Business, Woosong University, Daejeon 34613, Republic of Korea
    School of Economics and Management, Liaoning University of Technology, Jinzhou 121001, China)

  • Li Ma

    (SolBridge International School of Business, Woosong University, Daejeon 34613, Republic of Korea)

  • Miao Zhang

    (SolBridge International School of Business, Woosong University, Daejeon 34613, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

The increasing importance of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors has sparked scholarly interest in how company reputation influences stock market investment decisions. Most ESG research has focused on secondary data from public firms, ignoring the potential of surveys as a research tool. Addressing this gap, our study investigates the relationship between retail investors’ perceptions of corporate ESG performance and their investment attitude, as well as the impact on intention, with social self-efficacy serving as a moderator. The theoretical framework of this research was adopted from the theory of planned behavior (TPB) and previous studies that used TPB to measure intention reveal a range of explanations for the connection between the factors influencing intention through attitude. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) analysis was used in this study, and the new findings show that Chinese investors’ perceptions of corporate ESG performance positively influence their investment attitudes and intentions. Furthermore, social self-efficacy moderates the relationship between the corporate environment and governance performance, attitudes, and intentions. Accordingly, this study identifies the contribution of explaining how investment intentions are related to corporate ESG performance, which has been based on past ESG studies, to lay a platform for sustainable corporate practices in the Chinese stock market.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaojia Zhang & Li Ma & Miao Zhang, 2024. "Investor Perception of ESG Performance: Examining Investment Intentions in the Chinese Stock Market with Social Self-Efficacy Moderation," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-25, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:4:p:166-:d:1378345
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/4/166/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/4/166/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laura de Zwaan & Mark Brimble & Jenny Stewart, 2015. "Member perceptions of ESG investing through superannuation," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(1), pages 79-102, March.
    2. Lei Ruan & Heng Liu, 2021. "Environmental, Social, Governance Activities and Firm Performance: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Tao, Hu & Zhuang, Shan & Xue, Rui & Cao, Wei & Tian, Jinfang & Shan, Yuli, 2022. "Environmental Finance: An Interdisciplinary Review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    4. Rajdeep Kumar Raut, 2020. "Past behaviour, financial literacy and investment decision-making process of individual investors," International Journal of Emerging Markets, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(6), pages 1243-1263, April.
    5. Dominique Diouf & Tessa Hebb & El Hadji Touré, 2016. "Exploring Factors that Influence Social Retail Investors’ Decisions: Evidence from Desjardins Fund," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 134(1), pages 45-67, March.
    6. Crifo, Patricia & Forget, Vanina D. & Teyssier, Sabrina, 2015. "The price of environmental, social and governance practice disclosure: An experiment with professional private equity investors," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 168-194.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Benuzzi, Matteo & Klaser, Klaudijo & Bax, Karoline, 2024. "Which ESG+F dimension matters most to retail investors? An experimental study on financial decisions and future generations," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    2. Luluk Widyawati, 2020. "A systematic literature review of socially responsible investment and environmental social governance metrics," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 619-637, February.
    3. Sayema Sultana & Norhayah Zulkifli & Dalilawati Zainal, 2018. "Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) and Investment Decision in Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-19, June.
    4. Ciciretti, Rocco & Dalò, Ambrogio & Dam, Lammertjan, 2023. "The contributions of betas versus characteristics to the ESG premium," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 104-124.
    5. Yinglin Wang & Leqi Chen & Jiaxin Zhuang, 2024. "Research on ESG Investment Efficiency Regulation from the Perspective of Reciprocity and Evolutionary Game," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 64(3), pages 1665-1695, September.
    6. Yanuar Trisnowati & Noer A. Achsani & Roy Sembel & Trias Andati, 2022. "The Effect of ESG Score, Financial Performance, and Macroeconomics on Stock Returns during the Pandemic Era in Indonesia," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(4), pages 166-172, July.
    7. Anthony Piscitelli, 2023. "Classifying responsible investors: Identifying clusters of Ontario investors," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 94(4), pages 1133-1144, December.
    8. Anrong Gao & Tianren Xiong & Yuxi Luo & Defeng Meng, 2023. "Promote or Crowd Out? The Impact of Environmental Information Disclosure Methods on Enterprise Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    9. Hans B. Christensen & Luzi Hail & Christian Leuz, 2021. "Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 1176-1248, September.
    10. Li, Yan & Feng, Tian-tian & Liu, Li-li & Zhang, Meng-xi, 2023. "How do the electricity market and carbon market interact and achieve integrated development?--A bibliometric-based review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    11. Huang, Hongyun & Mbanyele, William & Wang, Fengrong & Song, Malin & Wang, Yuzhang, 2022. "Climbing the quality ladder of green innovation: Does green finance matter?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    12. Petridis, Konstantinos & Tampakoudis, Ioannis & Drogalas, George & Kiosses, Nikolaos, 2022. "A Support Vector Machine model for classification of efficiency: An application to M&A," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    13. Dela Cruz, Aeson Luiz & Patel, Chris & Ying, Sammy & Pan, Peipei, 2020. "The relevance of professional skepticism to finance professionals’ Socially Responsible Investing decisions," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(C).
    14. Kiran, Madiha & Chughtai, Sumayya & Naeem, Muhammad Abubakr, 2024. "Navigating greenwashing in the G8: Insights into family-owned firms, technology innovation, and economic policy uncertainty," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    15. Ming-Lang Tseng & Phan Anh Tan & Shiou-Yun Jeng & Chun-Wei Remen Lin & Yeneneh Tamirat Negash & Susilo Nur Aji Cokro Darsono, 2019. "Sustainable Investment: Interrelated among Corporate Governance, Economic Performance and Market Risks Using Investor Preference Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, April.
    16. José-Antonio Corral-Marfil & Núria Arimany-Serrat & Emma L. Hitchen & Carme Viladecans-Riera, 2021. "Recycling Technology Innovation as a Source of Competitive Advantage: The Sustainable and Circular Business Model of a Bicentennial Company," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-37, July.
    17. Gao, Ming, 2023. "The impacts of carbon trading policy on China's low-carbon economy based on county-level perspectives," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    18. Lee, Michael T. & Raschke, Robyn L. & Krishen, Anjala S., 2023. "Understanding ESG scores and firm performance: Are high-performing firms E, S, and G-balanced?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    19. Huang, Fu-Wei & Chen, Shi & Lin, Jyh-Horng, 2022. "Free riding and insurer carbon-linked investment," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    20. Tian, Jinfang & Sun, Siyang & Cao, Wei & Bu, Di & Xue, Rui, 2024. "Make every dollar count: The impact of green credit regulation on corporate green investment efficiency," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:4:p:166-:d:1378345. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.