IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v17y2024i2p77-d1339878.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Volatility and Herding Bias on ESG Leaders’ Portfolios Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Nektarios Gavrilakis

    (Department of Accounting and Finance, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 71410 Heraklion, Crete, Greece)

  • Christos Floros

    (Department of Accounting and Finance, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 71410 Heraklion, Crete, Greece)

Abstract

We here analyze the factor loadings given by the CAPM, the Fama–French three (FF3), and the five-factor model (FF5), and test the performance and the validity of adding two more factors (volatility and dispersion of returns) to the FF5 factor model of European index-based ESG leaders’ portfolios. Our ESG leaders’ portfolios generated significant negative alphas during 2012–2022, corroborating the literature’s negative argument. The negative abnormal returns of ESG leaders’ portfolios are homogeneous across the three ESG pillars. We conclude that European ESG leaders’ portfolios are biased toward large cap and value stocks with robust operating profitability and against aggressive investments. As robustness tests, we examine Global ESG leaders’ index-based portfolios, producing the same results but with reduced importance in some loading factors like profitability and investment strategy. Furthermore, we deduced that European and Global ESG leaders’ portfolios tilt towards volatility and herding bias.

Suggested Citation

  • Nektarios Gavrilakis & Christos Floros, 2024. "Volatility and Herding Bias on ESG Leaders’ Portfolios Performance," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-22, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:2:p:77-:d:1339878
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/2/77/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/2/77/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Tao & Dong, Hui & Lin, Chen, 2020. "Institutional shareholders and corporate social responsibility," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 483-504.
    2. Xiaoying Chen & Nicholas Ray-Wang Gao, 2020. "Revisiting Fama–French’s asset pricing model with an MCB volatility risk factor," Journal of Risk Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(3), pages 233-251, June.
    3. Costanza Consolandi & Ameeta Jaiswal-Dale & Elisa Poggiani & Alessandro Vercelli, 2009. "Global Standards and Ethical Stock Indexes: The Case of the Dow Jones Sustainability Stoxx Index," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 87(1), pages 185-197, April.
    4. Ameye, Nicolas & Bughin, Jacques & van Zeebroeck, Nicolas, 2023. "How uncertainty shapes herding in the corporate use of artificial intelligence technology," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    5. Economou, Fotini & Kostakis, Alexandros & Philippas, Nikolaos, 2011. "Cross-country effects in herding behaviour: Evidence from four south European markets," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 443-460, July.
    6. Bauer, Rob & Koedijk, Kees & Otten, Roger, 2005. "International evidence on ethical mutual fund performance and investment style," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(7), pages 1751-1767, July.
    7. Hüseyin Öcal & Anton Abdulbasah Kamil, 2021. "The impact of risk indicators on sustainability (ESG) and broad-based indices: an empirical analysis from Germany, France, Indonesia and Turkey," International Journal of Sustainable Economy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(1), pages 18-54.
    8. Naffa, Helena & Fain, Máté, 2022. "A factor approach to the performance of ESG leaders and laggards," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    9. Vergili, Gizem & Çelik, Mehmet Sinan, 2023. "The Relationship Between the Indices of Volatility (VIX) and Sustainability (DJSEMUP): An ARDL Approach," Business and Economics Research Journal, Uludag University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, vol. 14(1), pages 19-29, January.
    10. Luo, Di, 2022. "ESG, liquidity, and stock returns," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    11. Olivier David Zerbib, 2020. "A Sustainable Capital Asset Pricing Model (S-CAPM): Evidence from Green Investing and Sin Stock Exclusion," Working Papers hal-02570021, HAL.
    12. de Oliveira, Erick Meira & Cunha, Felipe Arias Fogliano de Souza & Palazzi, Rafael Baptista & Klotzle, Marcelo Cabus & Maçaira, Paula Medina, 2020. "On the effects of uncertainty measures on sustainability indices: An empirical investigation in a nonlinear framework," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    13. Michael McKenzie & Heather Mitchell, 2002. "Generalized asymmetric power ARCH modelling of exchange rate volatility," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(8), pages 555-564.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, An-Sing & Nguyen, Huong Thi, 2024. "A new perspective on how investor sentiment affects herding behavior in the cryptocurrency market," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 67(PA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Zhang-Hangjian & Kang, JingWen & Koedijk, Kees G. & Gao, Xiang & Gu, ZhenHua, 2024. "Short-term market reactions to ESG ratings disclosures: An event study in the Chinese stock market," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    2. Lars Hornuf & Gül Yüksel, 2022. "The Performance of Socially Responsible Investments: A Meta-Analysis," CESifo Working Paper Series 9724, CESifo.
    3. Graham McIntosh, 2016. "Socially Responsible Investment and Market Performance: The Case of Energy and Resource Firms," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1609, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    4. Janusz Brzeszczyński & Graham McIntosh, 2014. "Performance of Portfolios Composed of British SRI Stocks," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 120(3), pages 335-362, March.
    5. Urquhart, Andrew & Zhang, Hanxiong, 2019. "The performance of technical trading rules in Socially Responsible Investments," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 397-411.
    6. Brzeszczyński, Janusz & Gajdka, Jerzy & Schabek, Tomasz, 2021. "How risky are the socially responsible investment (SRI) stocks? Evidence from the Central and Eastern European (CEE) companies," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    7. Lu, Xiaomeng & Zhang, Xianjun & Guo, Fusen & Li, Feng, 2024. "Evaluating ESG Investment Profitability: From the Perspective of Sophistication in Investment Decision-Making," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 69(PA).
    8. Sangki Lee & Insu Kim & Chung-hun Hong, 2019. "Who Values Corporate Social Responsibility in the Korean Stock Market?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-14, October.
    9. Bassen, Alexander & Shu, Hao & Tan, Weiqiang, 2023. "Green revenues and stock returns: Cross-market evidence," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    10. Guillermo Badía & Maria C. Cortez & Luis Ferruz, 2020. "Socially responsible investing worldwide: Do markets value corporate social responsibility?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 2751-2764, November.
    11. Luo, Di, 2022. "ESG, liquidity, and stock returns," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    12. Reddy, Krishna & Mirza, Nawazish & Naqvi, Bushra & Fu, Mingli, 2017. "Comparative risk adjusted performance of Islamic, socially responsible and conventional funds: Evidence from United Kingdom," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 233-243.
    13. Amélie Charles & Olivier Darné & Jessica Fouilloux, 2016. "The impact of screening strategies on the performance of ESG indices," Working Papers hal-01344699, HAL.
    14. David Blitz & Laurens Swinkels, 2021. "Who owns tobacco stocks?," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(5), pages 311-325, September.
    15. Luo, Di & Farag, Hisham, 2024. "ESG and aggregate disagreement," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    16. Naffa, Helena & Fain, Máté, 2022. "A factor approach to the performance of ESG leaders and laggards," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    17. Oscar V. De la Torre-Torres & Evaristo Galeana-Figueroa & José Álvarez-García, 2018. "Efficiency of the Public Pensions Funds on the Socially Responsible Equities of Mexico," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    18. Hager Kossentini & Olfa Belhassine & Amel Zenaidi, 2024. "ESG index performance: European evidence," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(7), pages 653-665, December.
    19. Rehman, Mobeen Ur & Ahmad, Nasir & Vo, Xuan Vinh, 2022. "Asymmetric multifractal behaviour and network connectedness between socially responsible stocks and international oil before and during COVID-19," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 587(C).
    20. Arnaud Gougler & Sebastian Utz, 2020. "Factor exposures and diversification: Are sustainably screened portfolios any different?," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 34(3), pages 221-249, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:2:p:77-:d:1339878. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.