IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v17y2024i12p571-d1547677.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of Qualified Audit Opinion: Empirical Study of Portuguese Private Sector Hospitals

Author

Listed:
  • Maria de Fátima Simões

    (Department of Economics, Management, Industrial Engineering and Tourism, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • Carla Carvalho

    (GOVCOPP—Research Unit on Governance, Competitiveness and Public Policies, Higher Institute of Accounting and Administration, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

Abstract

This study aims to identify the determinants of the auditor’s qualified opinion in 71 Portuguese privately owned hospitals from 2019 to 2021. Seven research hypotheses are defined, related to the characteristics of the audited hospitals (size, performance, and debt), the qualified opinion of the previous year and the auditor’s characteristics (type, gender, and switching). The hypotheses are statistically tested using logistic regression models and data collected from the ORBIS and SABI databases, as well as the hospital’s annual reports. The results evidence that the determinants of the qualified opinion in private sector hospitals are the qualified opinion from the previous year, the hospital’s debt level, and its performance. The first two factors have a positive influence, while performance has a negative influence. In turn, the size of the hospital and the characteristics of the auditor do not seem to influence that opinion. In the private health sector, it seems that the endogenous characteristics of the audited hospital have the most influence on the auditor’s opinion, while other factors, such as the auditor’s characteristics, do not appear to influence qualified opinion. The present study provides important contributions to theory and practice, as the qualified opinion is highly significant for more informed decision making and research related to audit opinion in the healthcare sector is very scarce.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria de Fátima Simões & Carla Carvalho, 2024. "Determinants of Qualified Audit Opinion: Empirical Study of Portuguese Private Sector Hospitals," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-20, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:12:p:571-:d:1547677
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/12/571/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/12/571/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nouha Khoufi & Walid Khoufi, 2018. "An empirical examination of the determinants of audit report delay in France," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(8/9), pages 700-714, October.
    2. Ahsan Habib, 2013. "A meta‐analysis of the determinants of modified audit opinion decisions," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 28(3), pages 184-216, March.
    3. repec:eme:maj000:02686901311304349 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Foster, Benjamin P. & Shastri, Trim, 2016. "Determinants of going concern opinions and audit fees for development stage enterprises," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 68-84.
    5. Ammar Abid & Muhammad Shaique & Muhammad Anwar ul Haq, 2018. "Do Big Four Auditors Always Provide Higher Audit Quality? Evidence from Pakistan," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-22, June.
    6. repec:eme:maj000:maj-02-2017-1518 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. repec:eme:maj000:maj-01-2016-1296 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Duc Hieu Pham, 2022. "Determinants of going-concern audit opinions: evidence from Vietnam stock exchange-listed companies," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 2145749-214, December.
    9. Anne-Mie Reheul & Tom Van Caneghem & Machteld Van den Bogaerd & Sandra Verbruggen, 2017. "Auditor gender, experience and reporting in nonprofit organizations," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 32(6), pages 550-577, June.
    10. Ahsan Habib, 2013. "A meta-analysis of the determinants of modified audit opinion decisions," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 28(3), pages 184-216, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahmed A. Diab & Samir I. Abdelazim & Aref M. Eissa & Eid Mahmoud Abozaid & Mona Mohamed Elshaabany, 2021. "The Impact of Client Size and Financial Performance on Audit Opinion: Evidence from a Developing Market," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 10, January.
    2. Beu Lee & George Gamble & Thomas Noland & Yuping Zhao, 2024. "The Effects of Regulated Auditor Tenure on Opinion Shopping: Evidence from the Korean Market," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-28, November.
    3. Naoum, Vasilios-Christos & Ntounis, Dimitrios & Papanastasopoulos, Georgios & Vlismas, Orestes, 2023. "Asymmetric cost behavior: Theory, meta-analysis, and implications," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    4. Nadiah Amirah Nor Azhari & Suhaily Hasnan & Zuraidah Mohd Sanusi, 2020. "The Relationships Between Managerial Overconfidence, Audit Committee, CEO Duality and Audit Quality and Accounting Misstatements," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 11(3), pages 18-30, June.
    5. Manal Alidarous, 2024. "Driving Venture Capital Interest: The Influence of the Big 4 Audit Firms on IPOs," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-31, July.
    6. Muhammad Farhan Malik & Yuan George Shan & Jamie Yixing Tong, 2022. "Do auditors price litigious tone?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(S1), pages 1715-1760, April.
    7. Dorotheea-Beatrice-Ruxandra Chiosea & Camelia-Daniela Hategan, 2024. "Research Trends in Going Concern Assessment and Financial Distress in Last Two Decades: A Bibliometric Analysis," Risks, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-23, November.
    8. Khlif, Hichem & Chalmers, Keryn, 2015. "A review of meta-analytic research in accounting," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 1-27.
    9. Yan Luo & Steven E. Salterio, 2021. "Toward an Archival Measure of the Likelihood of Auditor‐Client Management Negotiation: An Exploration of the Audit Lag Measures Conjecture†," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(1), pages 109-143, March.
    10. Umair Bin Yousaf & Muhammad Zubair Tauni & Imran Yousaf & Nancy Lixin Su, 2024. "Board competence and green innovation—Does external governance matter?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3078-3102, May.
    11. Beylem Çelik & Gökhan Özer & Abdullah Kürşat Merter, 2023. "The Effect of Ownership Structure on Financial Reporting Timeliness: An Implementation on Borsa Istanbul," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, November.
    12. Ionela-Corina CHERSAN, 2019. "Audit Quality and Several of Its Determinants," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 17(153), pages 1-93.
    13. Wil Martens & Prem W. S. Yapa & Maryam Safari, 2020. "The Impact of Financial Statement Comparability on Earnings Management: Evidence from Frontier Markets," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-25, November.
    14. Santiago Lago-Peñas & Mercedes Mareque Álvarez-Santullano & Elena Rivo-López & Mónica Villanueva-Villar, 2017. "Determining factors for audit opinion in private family and non-family firms. Evidence from Spain," Working Papers. Collection C: Family business 1701, Universidade de Vigo, GEN - Governance and Economics research Network.
    15. Kris Hardies & Sarowar Hossain & Larelle (Ellie) Chapple, 2021. "Archival research on audit partners: assessing the research field and recommendations for future research," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(3), pages 4209-4256, September.
    16. Umair Saeed Bhutta & Zhang Youtang & Ali Raza, 2019. "Do Earnings Management Leads to Sub-optimal Investments by Firms? Empirical Evidence From the Textile Sector of Pakistan," Journal of International Business Research and Marketing, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 4(2), pages 11-19, January.
    17. Faiza Zulfiqar & Najam Us Sahar & Raja Nabeel-Ud-Din Jalal & Muhammad Akhtar & Um-E-Roman Fayyaz & Michelina Venditti, 2022. "Nexus Between Financial Crises, Corporate Governance and Future Stock Price Crash Risk," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, October.
    18. Carrera, Nieves & Mareque, Mercedes, 2023. "Does gender affect qualifying decisions? Evidence from public sector audits," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    19. Susana Escaloni & Mercedes Mareque, 2021. "Audit Report Lag. Differential Analysis between Spanish SMEs and Non-SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-21, November.
    20. Huma Fatima & Abdul Haque & Muhammad Usman, 2020. "Is there any association between real earnings management and crash risk of stock price during uncertainty? An evidence from family-owned firms in an emerging economy," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-12, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:12:p:571-:d:1547677. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.