IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v17y2024i11p511-d1521547.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

IPO Pricing in Germany and Switzerland in the New Millennium: Tests on Underpricing and Long-Term Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Rohat Barihas

    (Northern Trust, Grosspeter Tower, Grosspeteranlage 29, 4052 Basel, Switzerland)

  • Peter Weber

    (Department of Business and Economics, University of Basel, 4002 Basel, Switzerland
    ARPIG, Kapellenstrasse 34, 4052 Basel, Switzerland)

  • Heinz Zimmermann

    (Department of Business and Economics, University of Basel, 4002 Basel, Switzerland)

Abstract

We provide an updated analysis of initial public offerings (IPOs) by Swiss and German companies after the turn of the millennium up to 2020. We compare the characteristics of initial pricing to those observed in prior studies, test conventional hypotheses about underpricing cross-sectionally, and analyze the long-run performance of IPO firms. Our sample included 72 IPOs in Switzerland and 307 IPOs in Germany. We found an average (median) underpricing of 13.27% (7.19%) for Swiss IPOs and an average (median) of 21.50% (3.7%) for German IPOs; the averages dropped to 6.45% and 5.82%, respectively, after excluding the hot-issue market in 2000. Among the cross-sectional explanations, interesting effects can be observed with respect to the bookbuilding width and transparency standard of the listed market segment, as well as the reputation of the underwriter and the value of the greenshoe option. We documented strong post-issue underperformance for holding periods up to 120 months, which were, however, only present in the Swiss sample for median, not mean, returns.

Suggested Citation

  • Rohat Barihas & Peter Weber & Heinz Zimmermann, 2024. "IPO Pricing in Germany and Switzerland in the New Millennium: Tests on Underpricing and Long-Term Performance," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-35, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:11:p:511-:d:1521547
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/11/511/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/11/511/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexander Ljungqvist & Vikram Nanda & Rajdeep Singh, 2006. "Hot Markets, Investor Sentiment, and IPO Pricing," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 79(4), pages 1667-1702, July.
    2. Hansen, Robert S & Torregrosa, Paul, 1992. "Underwriter Compensation and Corporate Monitoring," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 47(4), pages 1537-1555, September.
    3. Liu, Laura Xiaolei & Lu, Ruichang & Sherman, Ann E. & Zhang, Yong, 2023. "IPO underpricing and limited attention: Theory and evidence," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    4. Jay R. Ritter, 2011. "Equilibrium in the Initial Public Offerings Market," Annual Review of Financial Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 3(1), pages 347-374, December.
    5. Busaba, Walid Y. & Chang, Chun, 2010. "Bookbuilding vs. fixed price revisited: The effect of aftermarket trading," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 370-381, June.
    6. Rock, Kevin, 1986. "Why new issues are underpriced," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(1-2), pages 187-212.
    7. Catherine M. Daily & S. Trevis Certo & Dan R. Dalton & Rungpen Roengpitya, 2003. "IPO Underpricing: A Meta–Analysis and Research Synthesis," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 27(3), pages 271-295, July.
    8. Eom, Chanyoung, 2018. "Institutional bidding behaviors during IPO bookbuilding: Evidence from Korea," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 413-427.
    9. FranÁois Derrien & Kent L. Womack, 2003. "Auctions vs. Bookbuilding and the Control of Underpricing in Hot IPO Markets," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 16(1), pages 31-61.
    10. Kuntara Pukthuanthong & Nikhil P. Varaiya & Thomas J. Walker, 2007. "Bookbuilding versus auction selling methods: A study of US IPOs," Venture Capital, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(4), pages 311-345, May.
    11. Salim Chahine & Gonul Colak & Iftekhar Hasan & Mohamad Mazboudi, 2020. "Investor relations and IPO performance," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 474-512, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alqahtani, Faisal & Boulanouar, Zakaria, 2017. "Sharia compliance status & investor demand for IPOs: Evidence from Saudi Arabia," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 46(PB), pages 258-268.
    2. Chen Su, 2018. "The efficiency of IPO issuing mechanisms and market conditions: evidence in China," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 461-495, August.
    3. Fred E. Huibers, 2020. "Towards an Optimal IPO Mechanism," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-14, June.
    4. Aissia, Dorsaf Ben, 2014. "IPO first-day returns: Skewness preference, investor sentiment and uncertainty underlying factors," Review of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 148-154.
    5. Zhang, Zhi & Zhang, Di & Jiang, Senyang & Li, Ao & Yu, Wei, 2023. "The effect of language on IPO underpricing: Evidence from a multinational research," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    6. Dorsman, André & Gounopoulos, Dimitrios, 2013. "European Sovereign Debt Crisis and the performance of Dutch IPOs," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 308-319.
    7. Lehmann, Timo & Weber, Matthias, 2021. "IPO Underpricing and Aftermarket Price Accuracy: Auctions vs. Bookbuilding in Japan," SocArXiv sa385, Center for Open Science.
    8. Hanafi, Mamduh M., 2021. "Fixed price and book building methods in an exogenous environment: Evidence from Indonesia stock market," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    9. Colak, Gonul & Fu, Mengchuan & Hasan, Iftekhar, 2020. "Why are some Chinese firms failing in the US capital markets? A machine learning approach," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    10. Matthew Pritsker, 2006. "A fully-rational liquidity-based theory of IPO underpricing and underperformance," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2006-12, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    11. Hoque, Hafiz & Mu, Shaolong, 2023. "Information spillover in Chinese hybrid IPO auctions," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    12. David C. Ling & Gianluca Marcato & Chen Zheng, 2022. "Does asset location and concentration explain REIT IPO valuation?," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 50(3), pages 672-706, September.
    13. Polona Peterle & Ales S. Berk, 2016. "IPO Cycles in Central and Eastern Europe: What Factors Drive these Cycles?," Czech Journal of Economics and Finance (Finance a uver), Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, vol. 66(2), pages 113-139, April.
    14. Güçbilmez, Ufuk & Ó Briain, Tomás, 2021. "Bidding styles of institutional investors in IPO auctions," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    15. Matt Pritsker, 2005. "A Fully-Rational Liquidity-Based Theory of IPO Underpricing and Underperformance," Computing in Economics and Finance 2005 414, Society for Computational Economics.
    16. Stavros Thomadakis & Dimitrios Gounopoulos & Christos Nounis & Andreas Merikas, 2016. "Collateral Regulation and IPO†Specific Liberalisation: the Case of Price Limits in the Athens Stock Exchange," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 22(2), pages 276-312, March.
    17. Dorsaf Ben Aissia, 2014. "IPO first‐day returns: Skewness preference, investor sentiment and uncertainty underlying factors," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(3), pages 148-154, September.
    18. Carey, Peter & Steen, Adam, 2006. "Changing conditions in the Hong Kong new issues market," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 14(5), pages 484-500, November.
    19. Jagannathan, Ravi & Jirnyi, Andrei & Sherman, Ann Guenther, 2015. "Share auctions of initial public offerings: Global evidence," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 283-311.
    20. Low, Soo-Wah & Yong, Othman, 2011. "Explaining over-subscription in fixed-price IPOs -- Evidence from the Malaysian stock market," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 205-216, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:11:p:511-:d:1521547. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.