IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v17y2024i11p479-d1505263.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Market Volatility vs. Economic Growth: The Role of Cognitive Bias

Author

Listed:
  • Neha Parashar

    (Symbiosis School of Banking and Finance, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune 412115, India)

  • Rahul Sharma

    (School of Business, Skyline University College, Sharjah P.O. Box 1797, United Arab Emirates)

  • S. Sandhya

    (IBS Hyderabad, ICFAI Foundation for Higher Education, Hyderabad 501203, India)

  • Apoorva Joshi

    (Symbiosis School of Banking and Finance, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune 412115, India)

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the interaction between market volatility, economic growth, and cognitive biases over the period from April 2006 to March 2024. Market volatility and economic growth are critical indicators that influence economic stability and investment behavior. Financial market volatility, defined by abrupt and erratic changes in asset values, can have a big impact on the expansion and stability of the economy. According to conventional economic theory, there should be an inverse relationship between market volatility and economic growth since high volatility can discourage investment and erode trust. Market participants’ cognitive biases are a major aspect that complicates this connection. Due to our innate susceptibility to cognitive biases, including herd mentality, overconfidence, and loss aversion, humans can make poor decisions and increase market volatility. These prejudices frequently cause investors to behave erratically and irrationally, departing from reasonable expectations and causing inefficiencies in the market. Cognitive biases have the capacity to sustain feedback loops, which heighten market turbulence and may hinder economic expansion. Similarly, cognitive biases have the potential to cause investors to misread economic indicators or ignore important details, which would increase volatility. This study uses the generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH) model on GDP growth data from the US, the UK, and India, alongside S&P 500, FTSE 100, and NIFTY 50 data sourced from Bloomberg, to examine evidence of these biases. The results show evidence of the predictive nature of market fluctuations on economic performance across the markets and highlight the substantial effects of cognitive biases on market volatility, disregarding economic fundamentals and growth, emphasizing the necessity of considering psychological factors in financial market analyses and developing strategies to mitigate their adverse effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Neha Parashar & Rahul Sharma & S. Sandhya & Apoorva Joshi, 2024. "Market Volatility vs. Economic Growth: The Role of Cognitive Bias," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-16, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:11:p:479-:d:1505263
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/11/479/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/11/479/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:11:p:479-:d:1505263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.