IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v16y2023i8p345-d1201723.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Association between Audit Quality and Corporate Tax Avoidance. A Bibliometric Review of Literature and Early Evidence on the European Union, from the Perspective of Tax-Related Key Audit Matters Disclosure

Author

Listed:
  • Cristian Lungu

    (Doctoral School of Economics and Business Administration, West University of Timisoara, 16 Pestalozzi Street, 300115 Timisoara, Romania)

  • Valentin Burcă

    (Department of Accounting and Audit, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, West University of Timisoara, 16 Pestalozzi Street, 300115 Timisoara, Romania)

  • Ovidiu-Constantin Bunget

    (Department of Accounting and Audit, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, West University of Timisoara, 16 Pestalozzi Street, 300115 Timisoara, Romania)

  • Alin-Constantin Dumitrescu

    (Department of Accounting and Audit, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, West University of Timisoara, 16 Pestalozzi Street, 300115 Timisoara, Romania)

Abstract

In the circumstances of increasing forms of corporate reporting, the relevance of the financial information is slightly decreasing, as the reporting strategies do not provide evidence of the potential deterioration of reported earnings, but rather try to hide managers’ earnings management practices through various impression management techniques and lower financial transparency. Therefore, the external auditors’ role becomes essential in mitigating the information asymmetry. This article aims to study the association between a quality audit and corporate tax avoidance. The research methodology was based on two essential stages. The first stage consisted of reviewing the specialized literature by applying the bibliometric analysis. In the second stage, we resorted to an exploratory analysis of the KAMs disclosed by European Union firms listed in 2016–2021. The study was carried out based on the information provided by the Web of Science and Audit Analytics databases. In accordance with the obtained results, we emphasize that more attention should be paid to the association between the KAMs disclosed by auditors regarding the extended audit reports and the indication of corporate tax avoidance through different tax planning metrics. At the same time, the study underlines that collections of data on KAMs’ disclosures could help specialists create a common body of knowledge about KAMs and how they should be used as communication tools between auditors, management, and stakeholders (including the state). The contribution of this article consists of providing informational support to the tax authorities to understand the main concerns regarding the business environment so that they can come up with supporting public tax policies that should facilitate the mission of companies to determine the tax burden. In addition, it provides researchers with a starting point to further explore issues related to tax avoidance techniques and the role of a financial auditor in limiting them.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristian Lungu & Valentin Burcă & Ovidiu-Constantin Bunget & Alin-Constantin Dumitrescu, 2023. "The Association between Audit Quality and Corporate Tax Avoidance. A Bibliometric Review of Literature and Early Evidence on the European Union, from the Perspective of Tax-Related Key Audit Matters D," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-14, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:16:y:2023:i:8:p:345-:d:1201723
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/16/8/345/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/16/8/345/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gul, Ferdinand A. & Khedmati, Mehdi & Shams, Syed M.M., 2020. "Managerial acquisitiveness and corporate tax avoidance," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    2. Dechow, Patricia & Ge, Weili & Schrand, Catherine, 2010. "Understanding earnings quality: A review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(2-3), pages 344-401, December.
    3. Aluthgama Guruge Deepal & Ariyarathna Jayamaha, 2022. "Audit expectation gap: a comprehensive literature review," Asian Journal of Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(3), pages 308-319, April.
    4. Hans B. Christensen & Luzi Hail & Christian Leuz, 2021. "Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 1176-1248, September.
    5. repec:eme:maj000:maj-10-2019-2445 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Francis, Jere R., 2023. "Going big, going small: A perspective on strategies for researching audit quality," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(2).
    7. Lan Anh Nguyen & Michael Kend, 2021. "The perceived impact of the KAM reforms on audit reports, audit quality and auditor work practices: stakeholders’ perspectives," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 36(3), pages 437-462, May.
    8. Christian Leuz & Peter D. Wysocki, 2016. "The Economics of Disclosure and Financial Reporting Regulation: Evidence and Suggestions for Future Research," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 525-622, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ronelle Burger & Canh Thien Dang & Trudy Owens, 2017. "Better performing NGOs do report more accurately: Evidence from investigating Ugandan NGO financial accounts," Discussion Papers 2017-10, University of Nottingham, CREDIT.
    2. Rolf Uwe Fülbier & Thorsten Sellhorn, 2023. "Understanding and improving the language of business: How accounting and corporate reporting research can better serve business and society," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(6), pages 1089-1124, August.
    3. Driss, Hamdi & Drobetz, Wolfgang & El Ghoul, Sadok & Guedhami, Omrane, 2024. "The Sustainability committee and environmental disclosure: International evidence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 602-625.
    4. Tobias Witter & Thorsten Sellhorn & Jens Müller & Vicky Kiosse, 2022. "Balance sheet smoothing," Berlin School of Economics Discussion Papers 0006, Berlin School of Economics.
    5. Abigail Allen & Melissa F. Lewis‐Western & Kristen Valentine, 2022. "The Innovation and Reporting Consequences of Financial Regulation for Young Life‐Cycle Firms," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(1), pages 45-95, March.
    6. Hans B. Christensen & Luzi Hail & Christian Leuz, 2021. "Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 1176-1248, September.
    7. Emirhan Ilhan & Philipp Krueger & Zacharias Sautner & Laura T Starks, 2023. "Climate Risk Disclosure and Institutional Investors," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 36(7), pages 2617-2650.
    8. Zhang, Qiyu & Ding, Rong & Chen, Ding & Zhang, Xiaoxiang, 2023. "The effects of mandatory ESG disclosure on price discovery efficiency around the world," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    9. Michael Minnis & Nemit Shroff, 2017. "Why regulate private firm disclosure and auditing?," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(5), pages 473-502, July.
    10. Jung Ho Choi, 2021. "Accrual Accounting and Resource Allocation: A General Equilibrium Analysis," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(4), pages 1179-1219, September.
    11. Darendeli, Alper & Fiechter, Peter & Hitz, Jörg-Markus & Lehmann, Nico, 2022. "The role of corporate social responsibility (CSR) information in supply-chain contracting: Evidence from the expansion of CSR rating coverage," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(2).
    12. Shroff, Nemit & Verdi, Rodrigo S. & Yost, Benjamin P., 2017. "When does the peer information environment matter?," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 183-214.
    13. Jannis Bischof & Joachim Gassen & Anna Rohlfing-Bastian & Davud Rostam-Afschar & Caren Sureth-Sloane, 2024. "Accounting for Transparency: a Framework and Three Applications in Tax, Managerial, and Financial Accounting," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 76(4), pages 573-611, December.
    14. Matthew J. Bloomfield, 2021. "The Asymmetric Effect of Reporting Flexibility on Priced Risk," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(3), pages 867-910, June.
    15. Blankespoor, Elizabeth & deHaan, Ed & Marinovic, Iván, 2020. "Disclosure processing costs, investors’ information choice, and equity market outcomes: A review," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(2).
    16. Fargher, Neil & Wee, Marvin, 2019. "The impact of Ball and Brown (1968) on generations of research," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 55-72.
    17. Miguel Duro & Jonas Heese & Gaizka Ormazabal, 2019. "The effect of enforcement transparency: Evidence from SEC comment-letter reviews," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 780-823, September.
    18. Breuer, Matthias & Le, Anthony & Vetter, Felix, 2023. "Audit mandates, audit firms, and auditors," Working Papers 333, The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, George J. Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State.
    19. Bok Baik & Omri Even‐Tov & Russell Han & David Park, 2024. "The Real Effects of Supply Chain Transparency Regulation: Evidence from Section 1502 of the Dodd–Frank Act," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(2), pages 551-587, May.
    20. Choi, Ahrum & Jia, Jingyi & Song, Byron Y. & Zhou, Gaoguang, 2024. "Cultural tightness and financial reporting behavior around the world," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:16:y:2023:i:8:p:345-:d:1201723. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.