IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v16y2023i4p236-d1120829.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Picking Winners: Identifying Features of High-Performing Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs) with Machine Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Caleb J. Williams

    (Data Science Division, Quilty Analytics, 33 6th St. S, Suite 204, St. Petersburg, FL 33701, USA)

Abstract

Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs) are publicly listed “blank check” firms with a sole purpose: to merge with a private company and take it public. Selecting a target to take public via SPACs is a complex affair led by SPAC sponsors who seek to deliver investor value by effectively “picking winners” from the private sector. A key question for all sponsors is what they should be searching for. This paper aims to identify the characteristics of SPACs and their target companies that are relevant to market performance at sponsor lock-up windows. To achieve this goal, the study breaks market performance into a binary classification problem and uses a machine learning approach comprised of decision trees, logistic regression, and LASSO regression to identify features that exhibit a distinct relationship with market performance. The obtained results demonstrate that corporate or private equity backing in target firms greatly improves the odds of market outperformance one-year post-merger. This finding is novel in indicating that characteristics of target firms may also be deterministic of SPAC performance, in addition to SPACs, transaction, and the market features identified in the prior literature. It further suggests that a viable sponsor strategy could be constructed for generating outsized market returns at share lock-up windows by simply “following the money” and choosing target firms with prior involvement from corporate or private equity investors.

Suggested Citation

  • Caleb J. Williams, 2023. "Picking Winners: Identifying Features of High-Performing Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs) with Machine Learning," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-21, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:16:y:2023:i:4:p:236-:d:1120829
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/16/4/236/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/16/4/236/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maričić Milica & Bulajić Milica & Radojičić Zoran & Jeremić Veljko, 2019. "Shedding Light on the Doing Business Index: a Machine Learning Approach," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 10(2), pages 73-84, September.
    2. Kolb, Johannes & Tykvová, Tereza, 2016. "Going public via special purpose acquisition companies: Frogs do not turn into princes," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 80-96.
    3. Floros, Ioannis V. & Sapp, Travis R.A., 2011. "Shell games: On the value of shell companies," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 850-867, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lee, Charles M.C. & Qu, Yuanyu & Shen, Tao, 2019. "Going public in China: Reverse mergers versus IPOs," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 92-111.
    2. Cheng, Zijian & Liu, Zhangxin (Frank) & Wang, Isabel Zhe & Zhao, Xingju, 2024. "Reverse merger audit fee premium: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    3. Charles M C Lee & Yuanyu Qu & Tao Shen, 2023. "Gate Fees: The Pervasive Effect of IPO Restrictions on Chinese Equity Markets," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 27(3), pages 809-849.
    4. Hyunseok Kim & Jayoung Ko & Chulhee Jun & Kyojik “Roy” Song, 2021. "Going public through mergers with special purpose acquisition companies," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 21(3), pages 742-768, September.
    5. Akdoğu, Evrim & Simsir, Serif Aziz & Meriç Yılmaz, Merve, 2022. "SPACs and the regulation gap: The effect of first SEC intervention on share and warrant returns," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    6. Tasawar Nawaz, 2024. "The iSPAC," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 311-324, July.
    7. Shachmurove, Yochanan & Vulanovic, Milos, 2013. "SPACs in Shipping," EconStor Preprints 88633, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    8. Pantisa Pavabutr, 2021. "White Knights or Machiavellians? Understanding the motivation for reverse takeovers in Singapore and Thailand," PIER Discussion Papers 153, Puey Ungphakorn Institute for Economic Research.
    9. Amaya, Diego & Brolley, Michael & Smith, Brian F., 2020. "Diamonds in the rough: The value of scouting for early-stage funding," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    10. Greene, Daniel, 2016. "The wealth of private firm owners following reverse mergers," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 56-75.
    11. Michael, Bryane & Goo, Say-Hak, 2017. "Do Corporate Governance Practices In One Jurisdiction Affect Another One? Lessons from the Panama Papers," EconStor Preprints 173676, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    12. Del Giudice, Alfonso & Signori, Andrea, 2024. "Sponsor reputation and agency conflicts in SPACs," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    13. Blomkvist, Magnus & Vulanovic, Milos, 2020. "SPAC IPO waves," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    14. Dimitrova, Lora, 2017. "Perverse incentives of special purpose acquisition companies, the “poor man's private equity funds”," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 99-120.
    15. Pantisa Pavabutr, 2020. "White Knights or Machiavellians? Understanding the motivation for reverse takeovers in Singapore and Thailand," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 983-1001, October.
    16. Dasgupta, Amil & Maug, Ernst, 2022. "Delegation chains," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118852, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    17. Liu, Jianan & Stambaugh, Robert F. & Yuan, Yu, 2019. "Size and value in China," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 48-69.
    18. Shachmurove, Yochanan & Vulanovic, Milos, 2018. "SPAC IPOs," EconStor Preprints 177392, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    19. Lakicevic, Milan & Shachmurove, Yochanan & Vulanovic, Milos, 2014. "Institutional changes of Specified Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs)," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 149-169.
    20. Kolb, Johannes & Tykvová, Tereza, 2016. "Going public via special purpose acquisition companies: Frogs do not turn into princes," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 80-96.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:16:y:2023:i:4:p:236-:d:1120829. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.