IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v15y2022i12p610-d1004328.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nexus between Regulatory Sandbox and Performance of Digital Banks—A Study on UK Digital Banks

Author

Listed:
  • Patrick Bernard Washington

    (Department of Business Administration, Morehouse College, Atlanta, GA 30314, USA)

  • Shafiq Ur Rehman

    (Department of Finance and Banking, University of Utara Malaysia, Kedah 06010, Malaysia)

  • Ernesto Lee

    (Data Analytics, School of Engineering and Technology, Miami Dade College, Miami, FL 33176, USA)

Abstract

It is debatable whether the regulatory Sandbox contributes to financial institutions’ growth. We used a panel sample of 24 challenger banks from the UK. This study has reviewed digital banks’ adoption of a regulatory sandbox to foster innovation in financial sectors. We assessed the regulatory tools that encourage FinTech innovations, focusing on the aims of financial stability. Therefore, we exploit the introduction of the Sandbox as a catalyst for digital banking and its heterogeneous effects on the financial performance of digital banks. Our research showed that regulatory sandboxes have a detrimental impact on the financial performance of digital banks, increasing compliance costs and efficiency costs. This study will contribute to the limited literature on regulatory Sandbox and its policy implication for the growth and performance of digital banks. The recommendation of this study would help to improve the regulation of the development of digital technologies in the UK.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrick Bernard Washington & Shafiq Ur Rehman & Ernesto Lee, 2022. "Nexus between Regulatory Sandbox and Performance of Digital Banks—A Study on UK Digital Banks," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:15:y:2022:i:12:p:610-:d:1004328
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/15/12/610/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/15/12/610/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simoens, Mathieu & Vennet, Rudi Vander, 2021. "Bank performance in Europe and the US: A divergence in market-to-book ratios," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    2. Beatty, Anne & Liao, Scott, 2011. "Do delays in expected loss recognition affect banks' willingness to lend?," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Anagnostopoulos, Ioannis, 2018. "Fintech and regtech: Impact on regulators and banks," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 7-25.
    4. Badarau, Cristina & Lapteacru, Ion, 2020. "Bank risk, competition and bank connectedness with firms: A literature review," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    5. Abuzarqa Rawan, 2019. "Evaluating Banks Financial Performance Using Financial Ratios: A Case Study Of Kuwait Local Commercial Banks," Oradea Journal of Business and Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 4(2), pages 56-68, September.
    6. Zhou, Xi & Chen, Shou, 2021. "FinTech innovation regulation based on reputation theory with the participation of new media," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luiz Antonio Bueno & Tiago F. A. C. Sigahi & Rosley Anholon, 2023. "Digital Banks in Brazil: Struggling to Reach the Breakeven Point or a New Evolution Wave?," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-14, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khattak, Mudeer Ahmed & Ali, Mohsin & Azmi, Wajahat & Rizvi, Syed Aun R., 2023. "Digital transformation, diversification and stability: What do we know about banks?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 122-132.
    2. Manganaris, Panayotis & Beccalli, Elena & Dimitropoulos, Panagiotis, 2017. "Bank transparency and the crisis," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 121-137.
    3. Qiuhong Zhao, 2016. "Do Political Connections Affect Bank Loan Loss Provision Reliability?," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 5(3), pages 118-118, August.
    4. Mustafa Raza Rabbani & Shahnawaz Khan & Eleftherios I. Thalassinos, 2020. "FinTech, Blockchain and Islamic Finance: An Extensive Literature Review," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(2), pages 65-86.
    5. Juan F. Prados-Castillo & Miguel Ángel Solano-Sánchez & Pilar Guaita Fernández & José Manuel Guaita Martínez, 2023. "Potential of the Crypto Economy in Financial Management and Fundraising for Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, March.
    6. Suarez, Javier & Sánchez Serrano, Antonio, 2018. "Approaching non-performing loans from a macroprudential angle," Report of the Advisory Scientific Committee 7, European Systemic Risk Board.
    7. Wheeler, P. Barrett, 2019. "Loan loss accounting and procyclical bank lending: The role of direct regulatory actions," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 463-495.
    8. Simoens, Mathieu & Vander Vennet, Rudi, 2022. "Does diversification protect European banks’ market valuations in a pandemic?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    9. Joohyung Ha, 2021. "Bank accounting conservatism and bank loan quality," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(3-4), pages 498-532, March.
    10. Bert Loudis & Ben Ranish, 2019. "CECL and the Credit Cycle," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2019-061, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    11. Rahul Singh Gautam & Shailesh Rastogi & Aashi Rawal & Venkata Mrudula Bhimavarapu & Jagjeevan Kanoujiya & Samaksh Rastogi, 2022. "Financial Technology and Its Impact on Digital Literacy in India: Using Poverty as a Moderating Variable," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-15, July.
    12. Byzalov, Dmitri & Basu, Sudipta, 2024. "The misuse of regression-based x-Scores as dependent variables," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(2).
    13. P. Barrett Wheeler, 2021. "Unrecognized Expected Credit Losses and Bank Share Prices," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(3), pages 805-866, June.
    14. García Osma, Beatriz & Mora, Araceli & Porcuna-Enguix, Luis, 2019. "Prudential supervisors’ independence and income smoothing in European banks," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 156-176.
    15. Martin Goetz & Luc Laeven & Ross Levine, 2020. "Do Bank Insiders Impede Equity Issuances?," NBER Working Papers 27442, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Baomin Chen & Xinyun Yang & Zhenzhong Ma, 2022. "Fintech and Financial Risks of Systemically Important Commercial Banks in China: An Inverted U-Shaped Relationship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, May.
    17. Bacha, Radia & Gasmi, Farid, 2022. "The broadband diffusion process and its determinants in Algeria: A simultaneous estimation," TSE Working Papers 22-1309, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    18. Domikowsky, Christian & Bornemann, Sven & Duellmann, Klaus & Pfingsten, Andreas, 2014. "Loan loss provisioning and procyclicality: Evidence from an expected loss model," Discussion Papers 39/2014, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    19. Schroth, Josef, 2021. "Macroprudential policy with capital buffers," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 296-311.
    20. Cousin, Jean-Gabriel & Dereeper, Sébastien & Essama Zoh, Gervais, 2024. "Impact of credit risk management on provisioning expectations: Evidence from U.S. banks during the subprime crisis," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:15:y:2022:i:12:p:610-:d:1004328. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.